EFR cobalt hitting up the drag strip
Dont have to much info on the 6 speed at all. I kind of just gave zzp a budget and told them to change things over and run with things. I was suggested the 6speed and told them to go for it. I know its in Matts car at around 700ish and they have tried to break it with no luck so far. The stage 2 is just not ment to hold serious power so this was suggested. Should be the first one with it in as a customer so we will see what happends.
Mark it's in the first option fourth from the bottom. Or is my eye lying to me because if that's what I believe it says that's the route I'm going.
ZZPerformance - Ecotec Forged Short Block #ZZ-ECTFSB
Too that note when did ZZP start building 6-speeds?
ZZPerformance - Ecotec Forged Short Block #ZZ-ECTFSB
Too that note when did ZZP start building 6-speeds?
ULWizSS 3rd & 4th ZZP Stage 2 Ported Head - YouTube
I did actually record some 0-60 and 60-100 times a little while back with hpt and believe it or not, his times were actually slower than my 60-100 times even though his car feels far faster than mine. They were done in the EXACT same little strip that I recorded my 4.09 60-100 in pretty similar conditions. The best part of it though, is when we were screwing around and did a roll race from 60 just for the **** of it, he completely demolished me! (don't give me that "driver mod" bs here either.. lol). One thing to take into consideration is the fact that 2 people were in the car at the time as opposed to when it was just me for my 60-100 times. Either way, I just thought the results were pretty interesting and sort of contradictory of the actual numbers....
And either way, I had him start at the same speed I did when I ran that 4.09.
So does this make term2 a liar for all of his 60-100 times he has always posted (both his car and the cars he has tuned)?
Lol.. oh relax there buddy! I still have to do a "true" 60-100 just for you so your butthole can dilate again and release your panties!
And either way, I had him start at the same speed I did when I ran that 4.09.
So does this make term2 a liar for all of his 60-100 times he has always posted (both his car and the cars he has tuned)?
And either way, I had him start at the same speed I did when I ran that 4.09.
So does this make term2 a liar for all of his 60-100 times he has always posted (both his car and the cars he has tuned)?
If Term did his the wrong way then his times are invalid in my eyes. Doesn't mean he can't tune bc I know he can. Knowledgeable guy for sure.
Even the big dogs with v boxes start about 45 ish mph. Even the sanctioned 60-130 time event at lonestar drag way does it that way. So who's right?
For real though it would be nice if we were all on the same page when comparing times and I was told by more than one person to punch it at 60. Seems like common sense to me. It's not a 45-100 time, it's a 60-100 time.
So you're saying that for the event you mention, they get their 60-100 times from starting at 45?
I guess my argument would be that we once all thought the earth was flat but...Well.... Do I need to finish? :-p
I honestly felt the same way until I found out a while back that when companies record 0-100 times it is pretty common place for them to subtract the 0-60 times to get their 60-100 times. I don't make the rules brotha, I'm just trying to keep things relatively consistant.
Either way, I just did a honest to god 60-100 time for you and ran a 4.36 if that makes you feel any better..
Either way, I just did a honest to god 60-100 time for you and ran a 4.36 if that makes you feel any better..
they start before 60 so that when they get to 60, the car is already wide open and pulling accordingly. it makes the cars all even that way. gets rid of throttle response, or turbo lag, anything..
When you race someone you don't go wot before the race starts. You pick a speed then punch it (for roll races obviously) and from a dig well that's obvious.
Lol come on dude. This didn't become a competition of who can tune better than who, nor did I mention anything about James so let's not make it one. I posted my logs man and you saw the time. What else do you want?
Lol.. oh relax there buddy! I still have to do a "true" 60-100 just for you so your butthole can dilate again and release your panties!
And either way, I had him start at the same speed I did when I ran that 4.09.
So does this make term2 a liar for all of his 60-100 times he has always posted (both his car and the cars he has tuned)?
And either way, I had him start at the same speed I did when I ran that 4.09.
So does this make term2 a liar for all of his 60-100 times he has always posted (both his car and the cars he has tuned)?

Ok now that this thread just took a turn for the worse.. sorry Mike! lol
4.36 60-100 is still really damn fast, and i knew that the zfr couldnt beat the stock turbo/e47-e85, just wanted confirmation. it probably pulls hard after 100, but up to 100 the stock turbo wins everytime i bet...
See I don't got breaking loose issues in third gear? wonder if something isnt right or its running rich or because I'm only running it at 20 daily and if someone wants to really race i'll turn it to 23-24?



