2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Fuel mods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 06:45 PM
  #1  
ericss's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 05-06-07
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Charleston,SC
Fuel mods

Has anyone tried modifying the pump on the engines like diesel guys do? Or modifying the injectors to flow more? This could easily allow full E-85 use and bigger turbos oh and more power.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 06:55 PM
  #2  
Iam Broke's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 1
From: Dark side of the Moon
Trifecta raises the fuel pressure if you request it. 2800 psi on E85 was still too lean on mine in the midrange. Stock is 2150 psi.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 07:00 PM
  #3  
army_greywolf's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 04-30-09
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Fond Du Lac, WI
Very good question, I sent a used injector to industrial injection who said it's possible to rework the injector (they are similar to the bosch injectors used by both Isuzu and cummins common rail motors) The problem isn't the injectors though, I noticed that in some cases fuel pressure just isn't there.

E85 guys can confirm or deny if at near 100% duty cycle the fuel pressure stays high enough. I suspect the pump is not strong enough to support high pressure (2800 or so) at 100% duty.

Furthermore, I see little reason the newest version of the UHPFP (CP4) pumps in the latest version of the duramax and ford 6.4 motors wouldn't work with the built in regulator and tuning. From what I see the injectors will still function beyond 5,000 psi. However, it's entirely likely at such an enhanced fuel pressure the spray pattern becomes less than ideal.

PS

You CANNOT use the cp3 belt driven pumps currently on the market, they require lubricated fuel, the cp4 uses a ceramic internal eccentric cam piston pump and needs no lubrication (a common standard with ultra low sulfur diesel)

Last edited by army_greywolf; Dec 16, 2010 at 07:06 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 07:07 PM
  #4  
ericss's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 05-06-07
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Charleston,SC
Army Greywolf you read my mind. But you should be able to mod the stock pump to flow more and run higher pressure? And why not run a external factory pump with a belt so if the stock pump is good for 600 fwhp then two would be good for 1200 fwhp? right? And if the spray patterns suck at higher pressure that where the injector mods come in at. And couldn't you run a boost a pump to push more fuel thru the stock pump?
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 07:12 PM
  #5  
Dart_SI's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-15-09
Posts: 7,170
Likes: 2
From: kansas
could u just get an aftermarket fuel pump?
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 07:18 PM
  #6  
army_greywolf's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 04-30-09
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Fond Du Lac, WI
ok to clarify, no and no.

supply more fuel to the hpfp wont result in a higher flow rate or pressure, the system regulates the pressure and the flow rate is limited to cc per stroke, so, basically its the displacement times half the rpm. supplying more fuel means removing the pump and modifying in such a way as to increase the bore or stroke. Same methods used to increase effective displacement in an engine work for increasing flow rate of our pumps.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 07:19 PM
  #7  
ericss's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 05-06-07
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Charleston,SC
You would think you could just add a booster pump but I think its so much you could try to push before it becomes a restriction or the fuel gets to hot.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 07:21 PM
  #8  
ericss's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 05-06-07
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Charleston,SC
I also wonder how the 2.4 DI pumps and 3.6 DI pumps are and is the 3.6 a bolt in swap or easy mod to make work?
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 07:26 PM
  #9  
army_greywolf's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 04-30-09
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Fond Du Lac, WI
Ok so I dug around, if you could FIND a roller style piston pumped nippondenso it can be converted to run belt driven HOWEVER it will require an external regulator. It has a 223 liter/hr rate @3600 rpm and while there is no rating beyond that, you can imagine what it's capable of, and I see nothing internally limiting it's rpm potential, although I see no reason at all to fuel beyond 200-220 liters/hr
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 07:33 PM
  #10  
ericss's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 05-06-07
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Charleston,SC
Well I can't wait to someones figure this fuel thing out wouldn't mind seeing 400+ fwhp on E-85 on stock turbos.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 07:35 PM
  #11  
ericss's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 05-06-07
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Charleston,SC
Also would the regulator have to be in between the two pumps?
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 07:49 PM
  #12  
army_greywolf's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 04-30-09
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Fond Du Lac, WI
E-85 would need the injector to flow more than the 22.2mg (I think it converts to .0166cc) at 10mpa, so lets see whats 2800... little under 20mPa so for the sake of it lets say 20... since flow rate is linear to pressure (2 psi flows twice the rate as 1 psi and so forth...) of course there is a MAJOR loss to internals and even the time it takes to open and close the injector electronically. I would say if you ran the system at or near 5,000 peak psi (im sure the injectors can handle that) there would be no fueling problems on gasoline or e85

Last edited by army_greywolf; Dec 16, 2010 at 07:59 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 07:59 PM
  #13  
blackvette101's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 09-27-08
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: delray beach, florida
i think zzp is devolping a auxillery port fuel system that should solve the fuel problems
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 08:00 PM
  #14  
Iam Broke's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 1
From: Dark side of the Moon
Originally Posted by army_greywolf
E-85 would need the injector to flow more than the 22.2mg (I think it converts to .0166cc) at 2150psi, even at 2800 psi that is still only .0197cc PER CYCLE. However, from my understanding, at that rate the pump cannot keep the pressure maxed.
You are correct, Sir,at least in my case anyway. When I did get a good 4.4 sec 60-100 mph pull it popped a Low fuel rail pressure CEL and reduced engine power at around 6500 rpm. Fully bolted with the HPFP set to 2800 psi >160% load it just would not keep up in the highest boost section of the midrange. Injector DC skyrocketed and my .89 lambda setpoint controlled to ~.94.

60% E is about the most I can get enough flow for reliably. 70% E is pushing it's limits here.

I have since found an injector seal missing on #3 and has been repaired, hoping for better results next spring. The mechanical fit on the injector held a good enough seal for ~50k miles than decided to start leaking. When I removed the fuel rail and injectors, there was no teflon seal on #3. Compression had always been a bit lower on it, not any more.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 08:07 PM
  #15  
army_greywolf's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 04-30-09
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Fond Du Lac, WI
so as I suspected, the problem is the flow rate of the hpfp not the injectors. If I could confirm a diesel hpfp that would work on gasoline, belt driven it would solve the problem of fueling and nullify the inability to run aftermarket cams. I also want to add, that in most cases even if lubricated fuel is required, there are additives made for that function that wouldn't hurt the motor or the injectors at all.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 08:28 PM
  #16  
ericss's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 05-06-07
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Charleston,SC
I like the way you guys are thinking.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 08:34 PM
  #17  
army_greywolf's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 04-30-09
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Fond Du Lac, WI
I'm an outside the box kind of guy, working on zr2 duramax s10 project, for the luls dammit. (s10 frames arent as wide as the zr2 s10, which means the max can be mounted lower and further rearward without firewall mods, which is win.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 09:08 PM
  #18  
ericss's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 05-06-07
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Charleston,SC
pics on the s10.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 09:11 PM
  #19  
army_greywolf's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 04-30-09
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Fond Du Lac, WI
nothin to show, havent got far other than acquisition but im gonna sell my dodge to fund the project, I can give some pics of that, it is an interesting beast
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 10:14 PM
  #20  
tomj77's Avatar
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 07-14-08
Posts: 12,039
Likes: 156
From: canada
would raising the fuel pressure with stock turbo help anything?
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 10:39 PM
  #21  
Iam Broke's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 1
From: Dark side of the Moon
I am on the stock turbo... see post #14 above.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 10:47 PM
  #22  
Garret's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-09-09
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg
army greywolf and iambroke you guys are ******* genious. A few of the only members on this site with useful info.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 10:58 PM
  #23  
tomj77's Avatar
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 07-14-08
Posts: 12,039
Likes: 156
From: canada
Originally Posted by Iam Broke
I am on the stock turbo... see post #14 above.
i mean on like 93 octane, not e85
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2010 | 05:45 AM
  #24  
Iam Broke's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 1
From: Dark side of the Moon
No reason to raise the fuel pressure on 93.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 08:56 PM
  #25  
raver0789's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-26-10
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Iam Broke, (whatever your real name is), I read your problems about fuel rail pressure issues while running e47. Have you tried to get a meth kit on top of you e47. Maybe you can inject a 50/50 mix and that will make up the extra for the injectiors not getting enough fuel in. Maybe a thought to improve on the 4.4 second run?

I thought about going half e85/100% meth, but the nearest e85 is an hour away in guelph. Unless I get a 60 litre gas can and fill it up with e85 and mix and match here during the summer, its' not going to work.

so 94 Octane plus 100% meth it is for me. My friend at work told me he can get me race gas in toronto, i might do a race gas combo plus 100% meth. (And my buddies still don't think I will beat my friends stock c63 amg in a roll race).
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 PM.