2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

just wondering what your guys a/f ratio is at wot

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2012, 02:43 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
kzak104's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-18-12
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
just wondering what your guys a/f ratio is at wot

mine is around 12.5. is that safe? i did a datalog and sent it to vicne but have been waiting for around 3 weeks and just want to make sure.

also i currently have stock plugs that have never been touched, what should the gap be running 22psi? im at 32000kms, should i change my plugs?

Old 12-30-2012, 02:45 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
BlackARCA06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-12-09
Location: Toledo, Oh
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats fine, I see 11's sometimes but its mostly in the 12's. If your not misfiring I dont see a point in changing the plugs but the gap should be .32 if you do. I bought a set from the dealer and they come gapped...I still check them though.
Old 12-30-2012, 02:51 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-08
Location: The 405
Posts: 37,073
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
X2 on the plugs. no sense in changing them if you aren't getting blowout or a misfire. plugs are a fine line between having enough gap to get a full burn but not too big of a gap where it blows out.

as far as afr's i can't say, a part of me is telling me aside from the stoich 14.7, afr's were different with the the lnf's cause of the DI but i don't remember what they were
Old 12-30-2012, 02:56 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
kzak104's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-18-12
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
alright thanks guys for the help! just wanted to be sure i wasnt going to blow up my engine with the a/f rations, everyone tells me its lean but they dont have Di cars...
Old 12-30-2012, 02:58 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
BlackARCA06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-12-09
Location: Toledo, Oh
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kzak104
alright thanks guys for the help! just wanted to be sure i wasnt going to blow up my engine with the a/f rations, everyone tells me its lean but they dont have Di cars...
Yea single digits is when you have to worry. My first tune from vince was in the high 10's.
Old 12-30-2012, 05:29 AM
  #6  
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (16)
 
07MetallicSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-29-06
Location: Land of Freedom
Posts: 23,373
Received 212 Likes on 171 Posts
I change plugs every oil change. I figure whynot they're cheap. Wot I'm around 11.3-11.1
Old 12-30-2012, 09:12 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
DirtyBalt09's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-28-10
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im at 12.2

I've heard most power is made around 12.5-12.8 with richer being safer.
Old 12-30-2012, 10:18 AM
  #8  
OBZ
Senior Member
 
OBZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-07-07
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mine is about 11.5 with the tune on, and about 12.2 with it off.
Old 12-30-2012, 10:46 AM
  #9  
Member
 
2000Firehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-28-08
Location: PA
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It's been well documented on this form, that .82 - .88 PE lambda is best for the LNF...

.82 Lambda = approx: 12.0 AFR , the 'safe' , richest , error on caution, for premium petrol
.88 Lambda = approx: 12.9 AFR , best for E47.5



I've been at .88 for a few years, runs like a raped-ape...

Last edited by 2000Firehawk; 12-30-2012 at 11:18 AM.
Old 12-30-2012, 11:16 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
prevsrt4owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-14-12
Location: Warner Robins
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yep, 12.8-12.9 AFR = sex for the LNFs. I'd say anywhere between 12.5-12.9 would be the best.
Remember, the LNFs are DI, haha. On the SRT-4, sweet spot was 11.5-11.8. Meth/e85 was around 12.3-12.5 for the best power.
Old 12-30-2012, 11:26 AM
  #11  
#cobalthoes
iTrader: (9)
 
dakotaspeir's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-08
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 3,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
11.8-12.1
Old 12-30-2012, 01:58 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
silverbullet08's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-12-08
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That tune needs a lot of work. AFR has a horrible curve. Up top 12.5 is not bad at all. Your safe/conservative with that AFR as long as your not getting knock. If you ran the dyno from a lower RPM you would probably see more power. 4800 rpms is too late to start.
Old 12-30-2012, 10:52 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
kzak104's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-18-12
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by silverbullet08
That tune needs a lot of work. AFR has a horrible curve. Up top 12.5 is not bad at all. Your safe/conservative with that AFR as long as your not getting knock. If you ran the dyno from a lower RPM you would probably see more power. 4800 rpms is too late to start.
doesnt the car have a lean spike when you first start the dyno run? and ya the place that did the dyno as never seen a cobalt im pretty sure, they said my car is running extremely lean and i shouldnt even be driving it.

it would be nice if vince would get back to me so he could get it sorted out if it does in fact need sorting.
Old 12-30-2012, 11:04 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
mexi_loco's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-20-07
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i'm at 12.4, but then again I'm on e
Old 12-30-2012, 11:27 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
rnjmur's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-06-06
Location: O Fallon, MO
Posts: 2,729
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Ideal AFR on an LNF is 12.5 - 12.9

I run 12.9 in the low end then ramp up to 12.6 at the high end. Many of the LNF tuners typically run 12.9 - 12.8 through the entire RPM range.

With that in mind, your tune is actually a little on the rich side except for when you initially go WOT. Vince typically runs his tunes on the richer side for safety so I would say that your AFR is exactly where Vince would expect it.

The tune is probably spiking at WOT which is causing the lean spike. That in itself can be fairly easily tuned out with a little work.
Old 12-31-2012, 12:12 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
T-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-07-09
Location: The Desert
Posts: 1,461
Received 89 Likes on 76 Posts
You should calcuate AF based on e10 stoich or 14.13 as most people run it as opposed to the typical 14.7

I command a lambda of .90 in the low/midrange tapering down to .89 and .87 past 6K

OP,

I honestly wouldnt worry as the tailpipe sniffer is usually a few tenths leaner than actual lambda readings. I noticed this on my previous sedan while on the dyno. I was commanding .88, HPT showed .875 to .88 and was seeing 13.2 AF on the tail sniffer reading... lol

What were the SAE numbers?

Last edited by T-Man; 12-31-2012 at 12:17 AM.
Old 12-31-2012, 03:26 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
kzak104's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-18-12
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sae numbers?
Old 12-31-2012, 09:13 AM
  #18  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
09CobaltSS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-12-09
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,910
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by T-Man
You should calcuate AF based on e10 stoich or 14.13 as most people run it as opposed to the typical 14.7

I command a lambda of .90 in the low/midrange tapering down to .89 and .87 past 6K

OP,

I honestly wouldnt worry as the tailpipe sniffer is usually a few tenths leaner than actual lambda readings. I noticed this on my previous sedan while on the dyno. I was commanding .88, HPT showed .875 to .88 and was seeing 13.2 AF on the tail sniffer reading... lol

What were the SAE numbers?
I'm pretty much right in this range as well, however I'm on e47. I tip in around .90-.92 and command .88 from there on. (.88 lambda is 12.9 a/f OP)

Originally Posted by kzak104
Sae numbers?
SAE is a correction factor. Your numbers are uncorrected.

T-man is also correct about the tailpipe sniffer registering a tad on the lean side from your actual commanded lambda is. If you're seeing 12.5 out of the tailpipe then you're very likely sitting at a commanded .82-.83 lambda (12.1-12.2 a/f). Either way, you are by no means lean at all. A 12.2 a/f is actually a tad on the rich side for my liking.

Most shops aren't used to seeing DI setups so they automatically think the engine is running lean when they see anything leaner than 12.8 or so. Trust me, I've gotten into heated discussions with shop guys who arent familiar with DI setups telling me about how my engine is going to blow if i dont richen things up quite a bit and yadda yadda yadda. Direct Injection = a totally different animal than Port Injection.

Last edited by 09CobaltSS1; 12-31-2012 at 09:24 AM.
Old 12-31-2012, 11:46 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
CannonBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-11
Location: Stratford, Ontario
Posts: 1,700
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I see 10.5
Old 12-31-2012, 02:52 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
kzak104's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-18-12
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i guess it cant be to lean if its running at 12.5 yet still depositing black soot all over my tailpipe. thats usually an effect of running lean is it now?

but ya the dyno i went to, the guys specialize in mustangs :P so they dont know what there talking about i guess, i figured this but just wanted to make sure.
Old 12-31-2012, 02:56 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Dart_SI's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-15-09
Location: kansas
Posts: 7,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
im at 12.8 at redline
Old 01-01-2013, 01:06 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
T-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-07-09
Location: The Desert
Posts: 1,461
Received 89 Likes on 76 Posts
Originally Posted by 09CobaltSS1
I'm pretty much right in this range as well, however I'm on e47. I tip in around .90-.92 and command .88 from there on. (.88 lambda is 12.9 a/f OP)
I'm jealous. I use to have an E station that was 5 minutes from my house. They stopped selling E in September of last year

Originally Posted by 09CobaltSS1

T-man is also correct about the tailpipe sniffer registering a tad on the lean side from your actual commanded lambda is. If you're seeing 12.5 out of the tailpipe then you're very likely sitting at a commanded .82-.83 lambda (12.1-12.2 a/f). Either way, you are by no means lean at all. A 12.2 a/f is actually a tad on the rich side for my liking.
I guranatee that he's sitting around .82-.83 with a Trifecta tune and I agree, a bit too rich IMO.

Originally Posted by 09CobaltSS1
Most shops aren't used to seeing DI setups so they automatically think the engine is running lean when they see anything leaner than 12.8 or so. Trust me, I've gotten into heated discussions with shop guys who arent familiar with DI setups telling me about how my engine is going to blow if i dont richen things up quite a bit and yadda yadda yadda. Direct Injection = a totally different animal than Port Injection.
I was told I'm going to burn holes in my pistons (possibility with but highly unlikely with fuel being sprayed right into/on the crown of the piston).

A pretty smart dude once mentioned that you hardly see LNFs blowing from running too lean but that many that were running excessive boost and excessively rich (for DI) were going kaput.

I mean FFS, people for the longest time were going WOT with a **** poor PE table and a jacked DAL table and being WOT while still commanding stoich lambda

Originally Posted by kzak104
i guess it cant be to lean if its running at 12.5 yet still depositing black soot all over my tailpipe. thats usually an effect of running lean is it now?

but ya the dyno i went to, the guys specialize in mustangs :P so they dont know what there talking about i guess, i figured this but just wanted to make sure.
Soot is a typical GDI trait but can be exacerbated by running too rich and using poor quality fuel.

Originally Posted by Dart_SI
im at 12.8 at redline
Area knows whats up
Old 01-01-2013, 03:06 PM
  #23  
New Member
 
BEG4MRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-23-12
Location: dayton
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my air fuels

12.3 12.5 at wide open throttle
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turbo Johnny
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
18
02-21-2019 09:41 AM
TylerJHowell
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
34
09-21-2015 06:47 PM
Shane H
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
7
09-20-2015 11:56 AM
63 Nova SS
Suspension
33
09-12-2015 11:21 PM



Quick Reply: just wondering what your guys a/f ratio is at wot



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:33 PM.