just wondering what your guys a/f ratio is at wot
#1
just wondering what your guys a/f ratio is at wot
mine is around 12.5. is that safe? i did a datalog and sent it to vicne but have been waiting for around 3 weeks and just want to make sure.
also i currently have stock plugs that have never been touched, what should the gap be running 22psi? im at 32000kms, should i change my plugs?
also i currently have stock plugs that have never been touched, what should the gap be running 22psi? im at 32000kms, should i change my plugs?
#2
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: 08-12-09
Location: Toledo, Oh
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats fine, I see 11's sometimes but its mostly in the 12's. If your not misfiring I dont see a point in changing the plugs but the gap should be .32 if you do. I bought a set from the dealer and they come gapped...I still check them though.
#3
X2 on the plugs. no sense in changing them if you aren't getting blowout or a misfire. plugs are a fine line between having enough gap to get a full burn but not too big of a gap where it blows out.
as far as afr's i can't say, a part of me is telling me aside from the stoich 14.7, afr's were different with the the lnf's cause of the DI but i don't remember what they were
as far as afr's i can't say, a part of me is telling me aside from the stoich 14.7, afr's were different with the the lnf's cause of the DI but i don't remember what they were
#9
It's been well documented on this form, that .82 - .88 PE lambda is best for the LNF...
.82 Lambda = approx: 12.0 AFR , the 'safe' , richest , error on caution, for premium petrol
.88 Lambda = approx: 12.9 AFR , best for E47.5
I've been at .88 for a few years, runs like a raped-ape...
.82 Lambda = approx: 12.0 AFR , the 'safe' , richest , error on caution, for premium petrol
.88 Lambda = approx: 12.9 AFR , best for E47.5
I've been at .88 for a few years, runs like a raped-ape...
Last edited by 2000Firehawk; 12-30-2012 at 11:18 AM.
#10
Senior Member
Yep, 12.8-12.9 AFR = sex for the LNFs. I'd say anywhere between 12.5-12.9 would be the best.
Remember, the LNFs are DI, haha. On the SRT-4, sweet spot was 11.5-11.8. Meth/e85 was around 12.3-12.5 for the best power.
Remember, the LNFs are DI, haha. On the SRT-4, sweet spot was 11.5-11.8. Meth/e85 was around 12.3-12.5 for the best power.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-12-08
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That tune needs a lot of work. AFR has a horrible curve. Up top 12.5 is not bad at all. Your safe/conservative with that AFR as long as your not getting knock. If you ran the dyno from a lower RPM you would probably see more power. 4800 rpms is too late to start.
#13
it would be nice if vince would get back to me so he could get it sorted out if it does in fact need sorting.
#15
Senior Member
Ideal AFR on an LNF is 12.5 - 12.9
I run 12.9 in the low end then ramp up to 12.6 at the high end. Many of the LNF tuners typically run 12.9 - 12.8 through the entire RPM range.
With that in mind, your tune is actually a little on the rich side except for when you initially go WOT. Vince typically runs his tunes on the richer side for safety so I would say that your AFR is exactly where Vince would expect it.
The tune is probably spiking at WOT which is causing the lean spike. That in itself can be fairly easily tuned out with a little work.
I run 12.9 in the low end then ramp up to 12.6 at the high end. Many of the LNF tuners typically run 12.9 - 12.8 through the entire RPM range.
With that in mind, your tune is actually a little on the rich side except for when you initially go WOT. Vince typically runs his tunes on the richer side for safety so I would say that your AFR is exactly where Vince would expect it.
The tune is probably spiking at WOT which is causing the lean spike. That in itself can be fairly easily tuned out with a little work.
#16
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
You should calcuate AF based on e10 stoich or 14.13 as most people run it as opposed to the typical 14.7
I command a lambda of .90 in the low/midrange tapering down to .89 and .87 past 6K
OP,
I honestly wouldnt worry as the tailpipe sniffer is usually a few tenths leaner than actual lambda readings. I noticed this on my previous sedan while on the dyno. I was commanding .88, HPT showed .875 to .88 and was seeing 13.2 AF on the tail sniffer reading... lol
What were the SAE numbers?
I command a lambda of .90 in the low/midrange tapering down to .89 and .87 past 6K
OP,
I honestly wouldnt worry as the tailpipe sniffer is usually a few tenths leaner than actual lambda readings. I noticed this on my previous sedan while on the dyno. I was commanding .88, HPT showed .875 to .88 and was seeing 13.2 AF on the tail sniffer reading... lol
What were the SAE numbers?
Last edited by T-Man; 12-31-2012 at 12:17 AM.
#18
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
You should calcuate AF based on e10 stoich or 14.13 as most people run it as opposed to the typical 14.7
I command a lambda of .90 in the low/midrange tapering down to .89 and .87 past 6K
OP,
I honestly wouldnt worry as the tailpipe sniffer is usually a few tenths leaner than actual lambda readings. I noticed this on my previous sedan while on the dyno. I was commanding .88, HPT showed .875 to .88 and was seeing 13.2 AF on the tail sniffer reading... lol
What were the SAE numbers?
I command a lambda of .90 in the low/midrange tapering down to .89 and .87 past 6K
OP,
I honestly wouldnt worry as the tailpipe sniffer is usually a few tenths leaner than actual lambda readings. I noticed this on my previous sedan while on the dyno. I was commanding .88, HPT showed .875 to .88 and was seeing 13.2 AF on the tail sniffer reading... lol
What were the SAE numbers?
SAE is a correction factor. Your numbers are uncorrected.
T-man is also correct about the tailpipe sniffer registering a tad on the lean side from your actual commanded lambda is. If you're seeing 12.5 out of the tailpipe then you're very likely sitting at a commanded .82-.83 lambda (12.1-12.2 a/f). Either way, you are by no means lean at all. A 12.2 a/f is actually a tad on the rich side for my liking.
Most shops aren't used to seeing DI setups so they automatically think the engine is running lean when they see anything leaner than 12.8 or so. Trust me, I've gotten into heated discussions with shop guys who arent familiar with DI setups telling me about how my engine is going to blow if i dont richen things up quite a bit and yadda yadda yadda. Direct Injection = a totally different animal than Port Injection.
Last edited by 09CobaltSS1; 12-31-2012 at 09:24 AM.
#20
i guess it cant be to lean if its running at 12.5 yet still depositing black soot all over my tailpipe. thats usually an effect of running lean is it now?
but ya the dyno i went to, the guys specialize in mustangs :P so they dont know what there talking about i guess, i figured this but just wanted to make sure.
but ya the dyno i went to, the guys specialize in mustangs :P so they dont know what there talking about i guess, i figured this but just wanted to make sure.
#22
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
T-man is also correct about the tailpipe sniffer registering a tad on the lean side from your actual commanded lambda is. If you're seeing 12.5 out of the tailpipe then you're very likely sitting at a commanded .82-.83 lambda (12.1-12.2 a/f). Either way, you are by no means lean at all. A 12.2 a/f is actually a tad on the rich side for my liking.
Most shops aren't used to seeing DI setups so they automatically think the engine is running lean when they see anything leaner than 12.8 or so. Trust me, I've gotten into heated discussions with shop guys who arent familiar with DI setups telling me about how my engine is going to blow if i dont richen things up quite a bit and yadda yadda yadda. Direct Injection = a totally different animal than Port Injection.
A pretty smart dude once mentioned that you hardly see LNFs blowing from running too lean but that many that were running excessive boost and excessively rich (for DI) were going kaput.
I mean FFS, people for the longest time were going WOT with a **** poor PE table and a jacked DAL table and being WOT while still commanding stoich lambda
i guess it cant be to lean if its running at 12.5 yet still depositing black soot all over my tailpipe. thats usually an effect of running lean is it now?
but ya the dyno i went to, the guys specialize in mustangs :P so they dont know what there talking about i guess, i figured this but just wanted to make sure.
but ya the dyno i went to, the guys specialize in mustangs :P so they dont know what there talking about i guess, i figured this but just wanted to make sure.
Area knows whats up
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post