2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Track times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 01:36 PM
  #1  
JP08turbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-28-08
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Lake Jackson, TX
Track times

Here are some times from this passed Friday at San Antonio Raceway in my 08turbo

First run
2.67 60ft
9.59 1/8
78 MPH
14.38 1/4
105.41 MPH

Second run
2.56 60ft
9.26 1/8
82.93 MPH
13.90 1/4
106.33 MPH

Third and best of night
2.24 60Ft
8.98 1/8
81.12 MPH
13.62 1/4
105.63 MPH

Last of night
2.6 60ft
9.39 1/8
83.27 MPH
14.03 1/4
106.84 MPH

I Think once i get the launching down i can get the ET down. This was my first time at the track in a FWD car so i do have some learning to do. Mod are a air intake i built and a 2 1/2in charge pipe i also fab up. Also I would like to thank supermantxz24 for the HP tune. One other thing i forgot to mention is the car had 1/2 a tank of 93 octane when 2 gallons of 108 octane were added.

Last edited by JP08turbo; Jan 13, 2009 at 02:04 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 01:50 PM
  #2  
krispy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-26-08
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 3
From: Somewhere, MI
you had the same problem I had, FWD 1st time at track lol

13.6 @ 105.6 w/ 2.24 60' isn't bad though
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 01:59 PM
  #3  
whitebalt's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 01-01-09
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: miami
from what i've seen the ss/tc basic time stock is alround a 13.8.....13.6 with a good driver.....but thats geting a 60ft of like 2.0..2.1.......my truck get like a 1.7 with drags and on slicks like a 1.5.......with a fwd a 2.0 is very nice
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 02:06 PM
  #4  
supermantxz24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-26-05
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: pasadena TX
good runs its hard to get a good launch in these cars especially when your use to having a rwd car.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 02:13 PM
  #5  
SUKXOST's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-06
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
I had a 1.90 in my Stage2 SC 2 years ago in Seattle. Could NOT believe it. I normally pulled 1.99-2.12's. Then what did I do with that 1.9 60'?????? I missed 3rd gear bad and still pulled a 13.58 @ 101. I was SO pissed! would have easily been in the 13.4's at maybe 106/7. These TC seem to be pretty common 2.2. Practice will easily get 2.1 or less. With my mods I'm hoping to be sub 2.0 but I need to get to the track at all and get a few passes under my belt.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 02:35 PM
  #6  
glhs379's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-08
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville FL.
so these are times witha cai/piping/HP tuners tune correct?

any dyno numbers?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 02:37 PM
  #7  
R&C_rallySS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-09-06
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by SUKXOST
I had a 1.90 in my Stage2 SC 2 years ago in Seattle. Could NOT believe it. I normally pulled 1.99-2.12's. Then what did I do with that 1.9 60'?????? I missed 3rd gear bad and still pulled a 13.58 @ 101. I was SO pissed! would have easily been in the 13.4's at maybe 106/7. These TC seem to be pretty common 2.2. Practice will easily get 2.1 or less. With my mods I'm hoping to be sub 2.0 but I need to get to the track at all and get a few passes under my belt.
wow, yea a 1.9 is real good on street tires with a FWD car. My best 60ft. was a 1.4, but that was with my Syclone

Originally Posted by JP08turbo
Here are some times from this passed Friday at San Antonio Raceway in my 08turbo

First run
2.67 60ft
9.59 1/8
78 MPH
14.38 1/4
105.41 MPH

Second run
2.56 60ft
9.26 1/8
82.93 MPH
13.90 1/4
106.33 MPH

Third and best of night
2.24 60Ft
8.98 1/8
81.12 MPH
13.62 1/4
105.63 MPH

Last of night
2.6 60ft
9.39 1/8
83.27 MPH
14.03 1/4
106.84 MPH

I Think once i get the launching down i can get the ET down. This was my first time at the track in a FWD car so i do have some learning to do. Mod are a air intake i built and a 2 1/2in charge pipe i also fab up. Also I would like to thank supermantxz24 for the HP tune. One other thing i forgot to mention is the car had 1/2 a tank of 93 octane when 2 gallons of 108 octane were added.
Good job!

Last edited by R&C_rallySS; Jan 13, 2009 at 02:37 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 02:43 PM
  #8  
poppagun's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-13-06
Posts: 2,928
Likes: 0
From: stl
that 108 is goin to loose you power unless your tuned for it so u might be better off goin without it.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 02:45 PM
  #9  
JP08turbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-28-08
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Lake Jackson, TX
Originally Posted by glhs379
so these are times witha cai/piping/HP tuners tune correct?

any dyno numbers?
No dyno numbers yet and it may be a week or so more cause my clutch is slipping now
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 03:32 PM
  #10  
thehov's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-11-08
Posts: 749
Likes: 1
From: Scooby Doo HQ
ooooooooooooooooo San Antonio........ My home town, last time I was at that track I ran my Supra TT, its way out in the boonies.... Nice times.....
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 04:10 PM
  #11  
1WhiteSSTC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-23-08
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
Originally Posted by krispy
you had the same problem I had, FWD 1st time at track lol

13.6 @ 105.6 w/ 2.24 60' isn't bad though
first night with my balt at the track only night too, damn winter, I managed to squeeze a 2.325 60ft time but only a 14.4@100.5MPH, ZERO track prep that night

http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x...meslips002.jpg
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 04:18 PM
  #12  
widowedeight's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-05-07
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
From: pa/jersey
wow i suck my first/only time at the track in my ss/tc the best i could get was a 2.6 60'.... now i know how to launch my car tho.... hoping for a 2.2 next time and sub 13's like 13.8 hopefully
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 04:33 PM
  #13  
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-08
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
From: Clarksville
Originally Posted by glhs379
so these are times witha cai/piping/HP tuners tune correct?

any dyno numbers?
If so I can't wait til he get's his 60' times down, he should be in the 13.2 range with ease, especially with his traps.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 04:40 PM
  #14  
1WhiteSSTC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-23-08
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
Originally Posted by widowedeight
wow i suck my first/only time at the track in my ss/tc the best i could get was a 2.6 60'.... now i know how to launch my car tho.... hoping for a 2.2 next time and sub 13's like 13.8 hopefully
yea i had alot of 2.6 60' times my first and only night at the track but i was lucky and got like 10 runs in that night so managed to pull a 2.3 the once, hopefully next time out i can grab a 2.2 and some better trap speeds.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 05:18 PM
  #15  
JP08turbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-28-08
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Lake Jackson, TX
Originally Posted by poppagun
that 108 is goin to loose you power unless your tuned for it so u might be better off goin without it.

Well that may be true but the car responded fine plus the car had 1/2 a tank of pump gas and only 2 gallons of 108 were put in. So the octane may have been around 96 98.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 05:29 PM
  #16  
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-08
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
From: Clarksville
Originally Posted by JP08turbo
Well that may be true but the car responded fine plus the car had 1/2 a tank of pump gas and only 2 gallons of 108 were put in. So the octane may have been around 96 98.
Either way I think you should just keep running what you're tuned for, or run 93 if you're not tuned yet.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 05:31 PM
  #17  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
man i really want to ge tmy hands on a new turbo balt and see what kind of times i can get.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #18  
Greased's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-09-07
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Originally Posted by JP08turbo
Well that may be true but the car responded fine plus the car had 1/2 a tank of pump gas and only 2 gallons of 108 were put in. So the octane may have been around 96 98.
it is true, octane basically means resistance to ignition. Unless your knocking, which i doubt you are. You effectively make your car slower anything above 93 unless you have a "track" tune. Probably had a minimal effect on your overall ET but still, it is truth
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 05:34 PM
  #19  
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-08
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
From: Clarksville
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
man i really want to ge tmy hands on a new turbo balt and see what kind of times i can get.
So go buy one, or go become friends with someone who has one and drive it, LOL. I think the fastest stock one so far has gone 13.5, and I really cant see one getting into the 13.3-13.4 range stock.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 05:38 PM
  #20  
Greased's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-09-07
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
So guy buy one, or go become friends with someone who has one and drive it, LOL. I think the fastest stock one so far has gone 13.5, and I really cant see one getting into the 13.3-13.4 range stock.
someone did a 14.0x with an ss/sc. im sure someone will get there eventually might not be posted on .net though
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 05:42 PM
  #21  
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-08
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
From: Clarksville
Originally Posted by Greased
someone did a 14.0x with an ss/sc. im sure someone will get there eventually might not be posted on .net though
Yeah that's true, but I think it would become very tough to cut a 13.3 or better in a stock SS/TC.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #22  
1WhiteSSTC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-23-08
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
Yeah that's true, but I think it would become very tough to cut a 13.3 or better in a stock SS/TC.
IMO, never gunna happen
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 05:47 PM
  #23  
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-08
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
From: Clarksville
Originally Posted by 1WhiteSSTC
IMO, never gunna happen
I dont think it will either. I think it would be sweet if someone slapped on some DR's and ran a 13.2-13.3 in a stock SS/TC.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 06:28 PM
  #24  
1WhiteSSTC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-23-08
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
I dont think it will either. I think it would be sweet if someone slapped on some DR's and ran a 13.2-13.3 in a stock SS/TC.
i'll do it if someone supplies me the DR's
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 06:31 PM
  #25  
JP08turbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-28-08
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Lake Jackson, TX
Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
I dont think it will either. I think it would be sweet if someone slapped on some DR's and ran a 13.2-13.3 in a stock SS/TC.
Well after i do my clutch i will be putting some drag radials on and try to bring down the 60ft and ET!
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 AM.