2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

tranny (?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 11:55 AM
  #1  
SuperCelica00's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 12-31-07
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo
tranny (?)

What kinda power are the t/c tranny going to be able to withstand ?
also what are the stock motors being able to wtihstand?
I know the s/c tranny's are not very strong,from what i've been reading!!
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 12:03 PM
  #2  
MapOfTaziFoSho's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-11-08
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
From: The Mogadishu of the Midwest
Your initial insight appears to be wrong about everything you've posted...


Search noobie. It isn't hard!
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 12:07 PM
  #3  
SuperCelica00's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 12-31-07
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo
yeah i just knew some a$$wipe like u was going to be like " Search noobie. It isn't hard!"
I have searched and been looking for a while!!!!
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 12:13 PM
  #4  
PimpLay2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-08
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh to D.C.
Originally Posted by SuperCelica00
What kinda power are the t/c tranny going to be able to withstand ?
also what are the stock motors being able to wtihstand?
I know the s/c tranny's are not very strong,from what i've been reading!!
same tranny as LSJ and some have reached 400hp without it breaking

by motor do u mean engine?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 12:15 PM
  #5  
SuperCelica00's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 12-31-07
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo
yes engine!
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 12:17 PM
  #6  
jwhitten's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-23-08
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Well i dont know what the TC trannys are supposed to be holding but mine is holding 328.9wtq just fine so far, and the motor is at 286.8 whp right now.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 12:18 PM
  #7  
umrdyldo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-06-06
Posts: 11,663
Likes: 65
From: MO
HEY QUIT FIGHTING.

Anyway. The TC tranny is the same just with a stronger clutch.

400 should be able to be pretty easily built.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 12:37 PM
  #8  
Gettinausernamesucks's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-07-08
Posts: 188
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
No they are not the same. The SC uses an F23 and the TC uses the F35. The F35 is significantly stronger than the F23. The F35 will live at 320 just fine, However when you throw more than 275 at them for several thousand miles they tend to get gear whine that sounds like straight cut gears just not as loud as that. (in other words they pick up a little whine) But the F35 and axles in the TC are way more robust than the SC's F23 and smaller axles.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 12:37 PM
  #9  
SuperCelica00's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 12-31-07
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo
Cool! I just really want to know the max limits of this car ! cuz i will be putting this car right up there!
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 12:39 PM
  #10  
Gettinausernamesucks's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-07-08
Posts: 188
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
you get above 320 and all bets are off. Some of them have lived to 400 HP but don't expect it to last 100 thousand. At that point its a crapshoot fer sure.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 12:42 PM
  #11  
MapOfTaziFoSho's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-11-08
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
From: The Mogadishu of the Midwest
Originally Posted by SuperCelica00
yeah i just knew some a$$wipe like u was going to be like " Search noobie. It isn't hard!"
I have searched and been looking for a while!!!!
Try harder.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 12:50 PM
  #12  
SuperCelica00's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 12-31-07
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo
Originally Posted by Gettinausernamesucks
No they are not the same. The SC uses an F23 and the TC uses the F35. The F35 is significantly stronger than the F23. The F35 will live at 320 just fine, However when you throw more than 275 at them for several thousand miles they tend to get gear whine that sounds like straight cut gears just not as loud as that. (in other words they pick up a little whine) But the F35 and axles in the TC are way more robust than the SC's F23 and smaller axles.
this is what i knew about the s/c!
but if that was the case it would not make sence to put the same tranny in this car!

Originally Posted by MapOfTaziFoSho
Try harder.
ok senior member since 4months ago ! do you know the answer to my question?
what are the limits of the t/c tranny?

Last edited by SuperCelica00; Oct 7, 2008 at 12:50 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 12:59 PM
  #13  
rnjmur's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-06-06
Posts: 2,729
Likes: 9
From: O Fallon, MO
Originally Posted by Gettinausernamesucks
No they are not the same. The SC uses an F23 and the TC uses the F35. The F35 is significantly stronger than the F23. The F35 will live at 320 just fine, However when you throw more than 275 at them for several thousand miles they tend to get gear whine that sounds like straight cut gears just not as loud as that. (in other words they pick up a little whine) But the F35 and axles in the TC are way more robust than the SC's F23 and smaller axles.
GM Europe F35
Specifications
Type: transverse front wheel drive, five speed manual transaxle.
Engine Range: 2.0L
Max Gearbox Torque: 258 lb.-ft.
Weight: 99 lbs.
Applications: Chevrolet Cobalt SS, Chevrolet HHR SS

Both the LSJ and LNF Cobalts use the same transmission. The only difference is the clutch. The Clutch in the SS/SC was only rated to like 220 hp which is why alot of people had problems with them once they upgraded to stage 2. Gm even specified (if you bothered to look) that the stock SS/SC clutch would not hold up to the power of the Stage 2 kit. I believe the SS/TC clutch is rated to like 300 hp, though if you look at the GM specifications above you see the transmission is actually only rated to 258 tq.... Since they changed the final drive to 3.82, the new gearbox maybe a little stronger but I haven't seen anything on it.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 01:11 PM
  #14  
MapOfTaziFoSho's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-11-08
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
From: The Mogadishu of the Midwest
Originally Posted by SuperCelica00
this is what i knew about the s/c!
but if that was the case it would not make sence to put the same tranny in this car!



ok senior member since 4months ago ! do you know the answer to my question?
what are the limits of the t/c tranny?
I know the answer and have posted it before, but you're lazy.

Last edited by MapOfTaziFoSho; Oct 7, 2008 at 01:15 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 01:32 PM
  #15  
Gettinausernamesucks's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-07-08
Posts: 188
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
No they do not use the same transmission. I work for GM service at GM and I can tell you for fact they don't. There was a thread in here about the F35 in SC's and comments about issues surrounding it. That thread was wrong. The SC has used the F23 from the get go and the TC is the first to use the F35. My Buddy that sits next to me has an SC and I have a TC and the transmissions are not the same.

The F23 has a sheet metal end cover on it and the F35 does not. The F23 is still used in the non performance Cobalt and G5 variants
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 02:13 PM
  #16  
buglio's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-26-07
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: nj
Originally Posted by Gettinausernamesucks
No they do not use the same transmission. I work for GM service at GM and I can tell you for fact they don't. There was a thread in here about the F35 in SC's and comments about issues surrounding it. That thread was wrong. The SC has used the F23 from the get go and the TC is the first to use the F35. My Buddy that sits next to me has an SC and I have a TC and the transmissions are not the same.

The F23 has a sheet metal end cover on it and the F35 does not. The F23 is still used in the non performance Cobalt and G5 variants
the ss sc has the f35 you can ask any one who replaced the trans that they put a new f35 in it and took the f35 out of it i have mine out and it is a mu3 getrag f35
http://forums.motortrend.com/70/1032...-sc/index.html
link to trans the turbo also comes with a six speed f40
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 02:47 PM
  #17  
Tomtwtwtw's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-30-06
Posts: 5,489
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
Both supercharged and turbocharged Cobalts have the same F35 tranny. SS/tc does have an improved clutch and slightly taller final drive, but that is it. Exact same gear ratios.

Gettinausernamesucks, look at the gear ratios between a ss/sc and a 2.4 or 2.2, and tell me they both have F23 trannies in them. It's just not the case.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 03:50 PM
  #18  
SuperCelica00's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 12-31-07
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo
Originally Posted by MapOfTaziFoSho
I know the answer and have posted it before, but you're lazy.
Are you f ing joking ?! dude im no noobie to this forum! and no you have never posted shiat !
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 05:12 PM
  #19  
Gettinausernamesucks's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-07-08
Posts: 188
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
You guys believe what you want to.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 05:17 PM
  #20  
MapOfTaziFoSho's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-11-08
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
From: The Mogadishu of the Midwest
Originally Posted by SuperCelica00
Are you f ing joking ?! dude im no noobie to this forum! and no you have never posted shiat !
Well, you don't know **** and you've been on here for a year...
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 05:40 PM
  #21  
Gettinausernamesucks's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-07-08
Posts: 188
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Ok guys
I was wrong. I gotta eat crow here. My partner and I have had this discussion a zillion times and you are all correct. The SC does in fact use the MU3 F35. Must be to many long days as the pressure at the big house is getting pretty ugly. And I even work for service. Now how bad is that.
My bad, I apologize.

yes the clutch and flywheel are different and are the axles.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 05:46 PM
  #22  
PimpLay2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-08
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh to D.C.
lol i should take ure job

YOUR FIRED
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 06:00 PM
  #23  
Tomtwtwtw's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-30-06
Posts: 5,489
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
Originally Posted by Gettinausernamesucks
Ok guys
I was wrong. I gotta eat crow here. My partner and I have had this discussion a zillion times and you are all correct. The SC does in fact use the MU3 F35. Must be to many long days as the pressure at the big house is getting pretty ugly. And I even work for service. Now how bad is that.
My bad, I apologize.

yes the clutch and flywheel are different and are the axles.
It's all good! Now how many ss/sc owners do you have to track down that you accidentally put F23 trannies in their car as replacements?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #24  
SuperCelica00's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 12-31-07
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo
Originally Posted by MapOfTaziFoSho
Well, you don't know **** and you've been on here for a year...
lol you would be amazed!!!
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 07:20 PM
  #25  
bri2203's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 03-08-08
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 1
From: Farmington Hills, Michigan
Originally Posted by rnjmur
GM Europe F35
Specifications
Type: transverse front wheel drive, five speed manual transaxle.
Engine Range: 2.0L
Max Gearbox Torque: 258 lb.-ft.
Weight: 99 lbs.
Applications: Chevrolet Cobalt SS, Chevrolet HHR SS

Both the LSJ and LNF Cobalts use the same transmission. The only difference is the clutch. The Clutch in the SS/SC was only rated to like 220 hp which is why alot of people had problems with them once they upgraded to stage 2. Gm even specified (if you bothered to look) that the stock SS/SC clutch would not hold up to the power of the Stage 2 kit. I believe the SS/TC clutch is rated to like 300 hp, though if you look at the GM specifications above you see the transmission is actually only rated to 258 tq.... Since they changed the final drive to 3.82, the new gearbox maybe a little stronger but I haven't seen anything on it.

....assuming your numbers are acurate why would GM being comming out with a stage 1 kit that has at least 290 HP and over 260 ft lbs of torque. The engine already make 258 ft lbs or torque with is already 2 ft lbs over the rating limit. I would think they would have many tranmissions to fix under warrenty...
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 PM.