2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

what do we need the spring/retainers for??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 11:40 AM
  #1  
BIG SS TC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-19-11
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Albany NY
what do we need the spring/retainers for??

and the supertec ones from zzp????
for some reason i keep hearing about them and either i was dreaming or what but cant remember why we would need them??? mabe cuz of the power we make.

help its driving me crazy
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 11:47 AM
  #2  
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 11-01-05
Posts: 12,462
Likes: 61
From: Miami, FL
Higher RPMS, boost, or different cams could all be a good reason for a spring swap. Some of the guys turning too many rpms are having issues with springs not returning quick enough, which is why the cars are throwing rocker arms.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 11:50 AM
  #3  
Sweetsandman's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: 01-15-09
Posts: 4,323
Likes: 0
From: Parma, OH
Basiclally...if you're revving past 7k...it's a highly advised upgrade.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 11:51 AM
  #4  
seeyaass's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-26-10
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Marshalls creek PA
When you overrev they wont break!
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 12:10 PM
  #5  
09CobaltSS1's Avatar
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 04-12-09
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
a higher valve spring rate decreases the chance of what's called "valve float" in the higher rpm range (in our case 7k+ like sweetsandman stated).

Valve float is basically when the cam lobes are spinning fast enough to the point where the valve springs are no longer able to keep up with opening and closing the valves correctly causing a "floating" in rockers and ultimately causing the valves to basically never completely close properly. This increased spring rate allows the rockers to stay afixed to the cam lobe or lifter (depending on what application we're talking about here) correctly, decreasing the chance of float up to a certain rpm range depending on the spring rate you're working with. This increased spring rate does however put more stress on the valvetrain resulting in potential rocker arm damage if the spring rate is too stiff for the application and the rocker arms are not strong enought to handle the punishment. 78# springs in our valvetrain should not give any cause for concern though. I was just throwing it out there just in case someone decided to throw a rediculous spring rate in the head
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 12:18 PM
  #6  
Gremlin85's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 08-01-09
Posts: 9,998
Likes: 2
From: Wheh ah we? MA.
Originally Posted by 09CobaltSS1
a higher valve spring rate decreases the chance of what's called "valve float" in the higher rpm range (in our case 7k+ like sweetsandman stated).

Valve float is basically when the cam lobes are spinning fast enough to the point where the valve springs are no longer able to keep up with opening and closing the valves correctly causing a "floating" in rockers and ultimately causing the valves to basically never completely close properly. This increased spring rate allows the rockers to stay afixed to the cam lobe or lifter (depending on what application we're talking about here) correctly, decreasing the chance of float up to a certain rpm range depending on the spring rate you're working with. This increased spring rate does however put more stress on the valvetrain resulting in potential rocker arm damage if the spring rate is too stiff for the application and the rocker arms are not strong enought to handle the punishment. 78# springs in our valvetrain should not give any cause for concern though. I was just throwing it out there just in case someone decided to throw a rediculous spring rate in the head
^This.

And the springs are no guarantee for an over-rev situation.

I also read somewhere that someone wanted to put a 98# spring in there...
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 01:01 PM
  #7  
BIG SS TC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-19-11
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Albany NY
yeah the friggen 98 post i saw that lol ment for real hi boost and alot of other thigs done. but yeah so right now im at 6800 rpms and heve to go see BYT for a retune and a little more aggesive tune so would these be a good buy than???
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 01:15 PM
  #8  
donkeyballs's Avatar
Platinum Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-08-10
Posts: 4,221
Likes: 1
From: buffalo
I wouldn't on stock turbo but thats just me.. If you had a turbo that was still making power up top it would be a different story.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 01:19 PM
  #9  
BIG SS TC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-19-11
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Albany NY
ok i see. hey u find anymore deals like charge piping or IC let me know lol
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 01:53 PM
  #10  
T-Man's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-07-09
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 89
From: The Desert
Springs would be beneficial on a stock turbo just as much as they would be on a larger turbo. Valve train issues can happen with or without excessive RPMs. Once you exceed the springs ability to control the valves (via power, valve lift/ramp rates or RPM), you get valve float or excessive bouncing of the valves which will wear on the seats and eventually not allow the valve to fully close.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 03:20 PM
  #11  
vahdyx's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 04-06-10
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 0
From: 6000ft on a Mountain in Colorado!
What if I kept my stock redline? Did I just waste money?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 03:34 PM
  #12  
donkeyballs's Avatar
Platinum Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-08-10
Posts: 4,221
Likes: 1
From: buffalo
I never reved it that high on stock turbo cause it seemed to run out of power but he ^ is right it would make it safer. Hell I don't have them now and i'm right around 450hp but my car never goes above 6500rpm.. Its next on the list though cause it can't be good lol.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 03:58 PM
  #13  
T-Man's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-07-09
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 89
From: The Desert
Originally Posted by vahdyx
What if I kept my stock redline? Did I just waste money?
That's okay man. If you picked some up, then it's nothing more than some simple but effective insurance. Definitely not a waste of money.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 04:02 PM
  #14  
T-Man's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-07-09
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 89
From: The Desert
Originally Posted by donkeyballs
I never reved it that high on stock turbo cause it seemed to run out of power but he ^ is right it would make it safer. Hell I don't have them now and i'm right around 450hp but my car never goes above 6500rpm.. Its next on the list though cause it can't be good lol.
I don't go past 6500 either and I'm still on the stock turbo. You might be able to get away with not running some for a little while but eventually, it would be a great idea for your setup, IMO.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 04:36 PM
  #15  
donkeyballs's Avatar
Platinum Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-08-10
Posts: 4,221
Likes: 1
From: buffalo
Originally Posted by T-Man
I don't go past 6500 either and I'm still on the stock turbo. You might be able to get away with not running some for a little while but eventually, it would be a great idea for your setup, IMO.
I agree but i want to do everthing at once unless it breaks and i have all this power so i don't have to rev the **** out of it.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 05:42 PM
  #16  
PrincessTurbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-09
Posts: 2,803
Likes: 1
From: In the mountains
Originally Posted by vahdyx
What if I kept my stock redline? Did I just waste money?
Hell no you didn't .


Guys are throwing rockers on GMS1 and I've seen some horrible heads in stock cars also..


Springs are a must IMO ....


Wish I would of done it before I blew it up... Live and learn..
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 05:46 PM
  #17  
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 11-01-05
Posts: 12,462
Likes: 61
From: Miami, FL
In many cases, wheelspin and momentum will allow the car to exceed the redline, sometimes by quite a bit. It doesn't take much to allow a rocker to hop out if the valve is floating. I saw upwards of 8K rpms when I had the limiter set at 7400 on my datalogs if the car was spinning through 1st.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 05:53 PM
  #18  
PrincessTurbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-09
Posts: 2,803
Likes: 1
From: In the mountains
Originally Posted by ItalianJoe1
In many cases, wheelspin and momentum will allow the car to exceed the redline, sometimes by quite a bit. It doesn't take much to allow a rocker to hop out if the valve is floating. I saw upwards of 8K rpms when I had the limiter set at 7400 on my datalogs if the car was spinning through 1st.
thats exactly how I did mine . 2nd gear not even full WOT some sand on the road and all the sudden Im at 8k , was a really hot day out as well
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 06:08 PM
  #19  
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 11-01-05
Posts: 12,462
Likes: 61
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by PrincessTurbo
thats exactly how I did mine . 2nd gear not even full WOT some sand on the road and all the sudden Im at 8k , was a really hot day out as well
Mine never broke anything. LSJ>LNF
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2011 | 11:17 PM
  #20  
PrincessTurbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-09
Posts: 2,803
Likes: 1
From: In the mountains
Originally Posted by ItalianJoe1
Mine never broke anything. LSJ>LNF
How much power was your LSJ putting out ?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Knightwolf
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
9
Aug 17, 2011 05:19 PM
burzumaske20
2.2L L61 Performance Tech
18
Feb 14, 2009 05:35 PM
burzumaske20
2.2L L61 Performance Tech
0
Feb 9, 2009 01:09 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:21 PM.