2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Are you Running E85!?!?!?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2011 | 09:58 PM
  #1  
NDCOBALTSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 01-17-11
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Grand Forks, North Dakota
Are you Running E85!?!?!?!?

Who is running E-85 ethanol? Do you like it, what kind of numbers are you putting down? had any problems? i am getting tuned for it next week by vince...thanks.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2011 | 10:37 PM
  #2  
D-mac's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 03-14-10
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
No im not
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2011 | 11:13 PM
  #3  
RYRO14's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 10-27-08
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 2
From: Lithia, FL
My HPFP couldnt keep up on full E-85, but it ran E-47 fine.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2011 | 11:20 PM
  #4  
Jmoney's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 08-11-07
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, Arizona
its good. my engine temps have gone down by almost 10 degrees. use to get like 27 miles to the gallon now i get about 19-20 street and freeway combined. Haven't got it dynoed yet but i can feel the difference. only down side is when i first start the car up in the morning it stutters a little.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 10:15 AM
  #5  
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 05-01-09
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
From: NEPA/North NJ
There's ways to make full E85 work on bolted cars but it makes them less powerful down low compared to a blend. I also so no difference in top end power going from a blend to full. I would stick with a blend unless you plan on getting the ZZP cams with the injection lobe modification.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 10:31 AM
  #6  
Ch1ck3n's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 03-05-10
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wi
Originally Posted by BYT*SS*TURBO
There's ways to make full E85 work on bolted cars but it makes them less powerful down low compared to a blend. I also so no difference in top end power going from a blend to full. I would stick with a blend unless you plan on getting the ZZP cams with the injection lobe modification.

This.

E47-E60 seems to be the sweet spot.

On full E85 with just a downpipe and a tune I put down 314whp/388ft lbs on a dynojet here in Green Bay. Since then I've retuned for E60 and the car is much much faster than on 85.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 10:55 AM
  #7  
WSFrazier's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-05
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Our car made huge improvements across the entire powerband, but then again I have a blower I also run a pretty darn aggressive map to take advantage of full e85.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 10:58 AM
  #8  
Iam Broke's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 1
From: Dark side of the Moon
Originally Posted by Ch1ck3n
This.

E47-E60 seems to be the sweet spot.

On full E85 with just a downpipe and a tune I put down 314whp/388ft lbs on a dynojet here in Green Bay. Since then I've retuned for E60 and the car is much much faster than on 85.

Toldyaso!
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 04:49 PM
  #9  
NDCOBALTSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 01-17-11
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Grand Forks, North Dakota
Originally Posted by Iam Broke
Toldyaso!
How do you get E-60, or how do you make it?
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 04:58 PM
  #10  
HHRSSouth's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-04-09
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Running E35 on the BNR 2871 turbo with Trifecta tune.

If you read the world wide webz thier is very good proof that anything over E50 blend doesn't make anymore power.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 05:22 PM
  #11  
09BlueBaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-13-09
Posts: 2,951
Likes: 0
From: Davie, Fl
Originally Posted by NDCOBALTSS
How do you get E-60, or how do you make it?
2g E85+1g 93=E60
Originally Posted by HHRSSouth
Running E35 on the BNR 2871 turbo with Trifecta tune.

If you read the world wide webz thier is very good proof that anything over E50 blend doesn't make anymore power.
This is what I hear. I run E60 cause its easy for me remember (2:1)
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 05:25 PM
  #12  
09BlueBaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-13-09
Posts: 2,951
Likes: 0
From: Davie, Fl
Originally Posted by Ch1ck3n
This.

E47-E60 seems to be the sweet spot.

On full E85 with just a downpipe and a tune I put down 314whp/388ft lbs on a dynojet here in Green Bay. Since then I've retuned for E60 and the car is much much faster than on 85.
Get some kind of a intake mod done and add a little more timing/boost and you could see numbers closer 350/400
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 05:51 PM
  #13  
Turbo'dSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 08-01-08
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
Im full bolt ons and full e85 thru Trifecta, Vince has me on a not so aggressive tune. I put down 330hp and 375tq. I've had no problems whatsoever with it.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 05:54 PM
  #14  
SCcobaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 11-28-06
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix
Originally Posted by Turbo'dSS
Im full bolt ons and full e85 thru Trifecta, Vince has me on a not so aggressive tune. I put down 330hp and 375tq. I've had no problems whatsoever with it.
Why wouldnt you go aggressive with full E85? 330/375 is not that great for a fully bolted full E car.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 06:25 PM
  #15  
09CobaltSS1's Avatar
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 04-12-09
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by HHRSSouth
Running E35 on the BNR 2871 turbo with Trifecta tune.

If you read the world wide webz thier is very good proof that anything over E50 blend doesn't make anymore power.
It might be a little more helpful to actually post some info for folks to see.

Click on the graph below. It is interesting to note that the blending response of RON and MON as a function of ethanol content is highly nonlinear. There is a substantial octane improvement between RG and E10, and between E10 and E50. However, between E50 and E85 there is very little difference in either RON or MON. So basically the perfomance gains from an E50 blend to an E85 blend is very very minimal and almost not worth the headache for fueling concerns. I highlighted the compared octane numbers in gray in the graph. Notice the R+M/2 rating. E50 is only .2 octane lower than E85.... hmmmm

Keep in mind with this graph that RG=regular gas 87 octane no ethanol, HO=91 high octane no ethnnol, E10=90% 91 octane/10% ethanol blend, E50=50% 91 octane/50% ethanol mix, E85=15% 91 octane/85% ethanol blend.

Also for those that may or may not know, RON stands for Research Octane Number (widely used in Europe, octane ratings tend to be high because the tests simulate fuel performance under low severity engine operation), MON stands for Motor Octane Number (rarely used outside of a chem lab, and octane ratings tend to be much lower than RON because the tests simulate a more severe operation that might be incurred at high speed or high load), and finally R+M/2 which of course is literally RON+MON/2 which is used in the US and Canada as a standard for rating octane in a fuel.

Last edited by 09CobaltSS1; Jan 27, 2015 at 11:44 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 07:09 PM
  #16  
TX.SS.TC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 03-25-11
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
From: DFW, Texas
Subd
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 07:11 PM
  #17  
HHRSSouth's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-04-09
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Originally Posted by 09CobaltSS1
It might be a little more helpful to actually post some info for folks to see.

Click on the graph below. It is interesting to note that the blending response of RON and MON as a function of ethanol content is highly nonlinear. There is a substantial octane improvement between RG and E10, and between E10 and E50. However, between E50 and E85 there is very little difference in either RON or MON. So basically the perfomance gains from an E50 blend to an E85 blend is very very minimal and almost not worth the headache for fueling concerns. I highlighted the compared octane numbers in gray in the graph. Notice the R+M/2 rating. E50 is only .2 octane lower than E85.... hmmmm

Keep in mind with this graph that RG=regular gas 87 octane no ethanol, HO=91 high octane no ethnnol, E10=90% 91 octane/10% ethanol blend, E50=50% 91 octane/50% ethanol mix, E85=15% 91 octane/85% ethanol blend.

Also for those that may or may not know, RON stands for Research Octane Number (widely used in Europe, octane ratings tend to be high because the tests simulate fuel performance under low severity engine operation), MON stands for Motor Octane Number (rarely used outside of a chem lab, and octane ratings tend to be much lower than RON because the tests simulate a more severe operation that might be incurred at high speed or high load), and finally R+M/2 which of course is literally RON+MON/2 which is used in the US and Canada as a standard for rating octane in a fuel.
It might be, but to be honest I get sick of doing all the searching for people, they have google just like me.

Originally Posted by 09BlueBaltSS
2g E85+1g 93=E60


This is what I hear. I run E60 cause its easy for me remember (2:1)
Same for me using E35 in my 16 gallon tank. The ratio is easier to keep up with on my fuel gauge dash marks.

Last edited by HHRSSouth; Jun 24, 2011 at 07:32 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 07:28 PM
  #18  
09CobaltSS1's Avatar
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 04-12-09
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by HHRSSouth
It might be, but to be honest I get sick of doing all the searching for people, they have google just like me.
No I hear you. Most are most definitely a little on the lazy side, but I'd just rather give consistant and accurate information when possible. Sometimes things get confused and misconstrued when multiple sources are being referanced
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 10:49 PM
  #19  
Turbo'dSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 08-01-08
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
Originally Posted by SCcobaltSS
Why wouldnt you go aggressive with full E85? 330/375 is not that great for a fully bolted full E car.
cuz i cant afford a clutch right now. lol! its the first tune i got from trifecta. Drew said vince could go more agressive, but for now im good untill i get my clutch.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2011 | 11:33 AM
  #20  
NDCOBALTSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 01-17-11
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Grand Forks, North Dakota
So i have E15, E30, E85, 87 and 89 with up to 10% E all at one pump. how would i make E60, or 35, or 47? we dont have 93 octane here.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2011 | 12:00 PM
  #21  
09CobaltSS1's Avatar
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 04-12-09
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by NDCOBALTSS
So i have E15, E30, E85, 87 and 89 with up to 10% E all at one pump. how would i make E60, or 35, or 47? we dont have 93 octane here.
no 91? Either way, seeing as how you have E30 available in your area I would personally just stick with that to be honest. No blending, no containers and no math involved. Just pull up to the pump, fill up and and be on your way.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2011 | 02:58 PM
  #22  
bcc09ss/tc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-07-10
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, Kansas
So what all is needed to run e60? Bigger fuel pump or is it all in the tune? And do you always have to run the blend, or can you switch from e60 to 91 with out any issues?
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2011 | 04:28 PM
  #23  
Iam Broke's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 1
From: Dark side of the Moon
Tune will get you to 60% E but 47% is all you need. Once tuned you have to stay with it.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2011 | 04:45 PM
  #24  
smthomas556's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 05-26-08
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Arizona
1:1 blend for me.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2011 | 07:42 PM
  #25  
tomj77's Avatar
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 07-14-08
Posts: 12,039
Likes: 156
From: canada
whats the point of e85 besides potental for more power? its cheaper yes, but u get quite a bit less gas milage, which in the end makes it just as expensive as normal 93. So why do it?
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 PM.