2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

8000 rpm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 07:06 PM
  #26  
XTC_916's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-08
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
But if you are reving to 8000 rpm's wouldn't you be able to put on a 3 inch pulley and get the same boost as a smaller pulley?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 08:00 PM
  #27  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
Originally Posted by Deathscythe
Pyros, could you post the same numbers for the tvs? I am curious if we can spin the blower outside it's efficiency range.
his numbers are slightly off, but not enough that they aren't correct. But the rpms are the same for the m62 or the tvs. He put in smaller print that the tvs would NOT be out of it's efficiency range.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 09:56 PM
  #28  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by XTC_916
But if you are reving to 8000 rpm's wouldn't you be able to put on a 3 inch pulley and get the same boost as a smaller pulley?
no. The supercharger will indeed be spinning as fast as a smaller pulley would make it run, but the engine is also spinning faster, taking in more air every second to match the output of the supercharger. That would leave less air left in the intake manifold to produce boost.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 10:44 PM
  #29  
Pyros777's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 01-26-05
Posts: 3,418
Likes: 1
From: N/A
Originally Posted by ralliartist
his numbers are slightly off, but not enough that they aren't correct. But the rpms are the same for the m62 or the tvs. He put in smaller print that the tvs would NOT be out of it's efficiency range.
Yeah the numbers would be the same for the TVS. Since were on the subject, here is what you'd have to rev the engine to to reach the 22,000 rpm mark. Pretty silly but I'm sure some are curious to know:

2.3 @ 8,096 = 22,000 rpm
2.4 @ 8,448 = 22,000 rpm
2.5 @ 8,800 = 22,000 rpm
2.6 @ 9,152 = 22,000 rpm
2.7 @ 9,504 = 22,000 rpm
2.75 @ 9,680 = 22,000 rpm
2.80 @ 9,856 = 22,000 rpm
2.85 @ 10,032 = 22,000 rpm
2.9 @ 10,208 = 22,000 rpm
3.0 @ 10,560 = 22,000 rpm
3.1 @ 10,912 = 22,000 rpm
3.2 @ 11,264 = 22,000 rpm
3.3 @ 11,616 = 22,000 rpm
3.4 @ 11,968 = 22,000 rpm

So theres a demonstration of how hard it would be to run the TVS to its maximum tested continuous speed. Damn near impossible.

By the way, the forumla I'm using is:

(blower rpm * pulley size) / Crankshaft pulley size = engine rpm

So for a 2.75" pulley this is what I'm doing:

(22,000 * 2.75) / 6.25 = 9,680 rpm
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 10:52 PM
  #30  
XTC_916's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-08
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
So to really get benifit from 8000 rpm then the tvs is needed. What about 7500 rpms? I think OTT has a tune option of 7400.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 10:56 PM
  #31  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by XTC_916
So to really get benifit from 8000 rpm then the tvs is needed. What about 7500 rpms? I think OTT has a tune option of 7400.
not really. an M62 will also see gais, assuming you have the correct headwork. You just have to be sure you're not overspinning the blower using a M62
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 11:04 PM
  #32  
XTC_916's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-08
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Well to not over spin the m62 you would need to get a 3 inch pulley which would make only 15 pounds of boost or so.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2009 | 01:15 PM
  #33  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
^^ correct...but 15psi yields about how much torque? multiply that torque by RPM and you'll get some good power at the wheels.
its all personal preference though
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2009 | 02:42 PM
  #34  
Zooomer's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-13-05
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 3
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Has anyone ever actually experience problems from spinning to high? Seems like a lot of rumors without much experience talking about what you need to spin to 8k. I'm wondering how many have tried it and had problems??
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2009 | 02:51 PM
  #35  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
i ran into valve float on stock valve train once i pushed the 7500-7600 mark. (30-32k mi)

its an easy to hear sound, and the data logs went wacky.

in fact, i might still have some on the laptop....i'll take a peak.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2009 | 02:55 PM
  #36  
WSFrazier's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-05
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
I've driven/built 2 LSJ's that go to 8K daily. M62, TVS, and Turbo. No problems what so ever. People make it into a huge deal for nothing.

Both are DD street cars they use to get to work.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2009 | 03:11 PM
  #37  
coopn8r's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 1
From: Southern Ohio
If you're going to be running a full valvetrain persay with a ported head and full exhaust.. Do you honestly think that a 3.0" pulley will net you 15 pounds of boost? Not even close.. I was running a 2.6 with a ported blower and full 3" exhaust and barely saw 17 pounds of boost..

Just food for thought?
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #38  
Zooomer's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-13-05
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 3
From: Grand Rapids, MI
I just threw a Cobalt on the dyno and let it rip. Bone stock except for ZZP 1.0 flash and injectors. Made 234WHP peak at 7200 rpm. Made it to 7500 no problem but there wasn't a point in trying it higher cause power was falling. Peak power is incredibly dependent on timing. PCM was peaking at 26 deg timing past 7k. With reduced timing (happens on it's own in most flashes when you drop pulley size) peak power is lower in the rpm band.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2009 | 05:12 PM
  #39  
StevesBlack06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 01-28-07
Posts: 1,996
Likes: 1
From: Northwest Indiana
i plan to rev to 8000 when my build is finished. i was planning on using a 2.8" but i may use my stg2 pulley to be on the safe side. i have a fully upgraded supertech valvetrain ported head as well as balance shaft deletes.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigdeertz
Parts
47
Nov 17, 2016 09:41 AM
RaginChopsuey
War Stories
16
Oct 27, 2015 01:27 PM
patooyee
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
50
Oct 15, 2015 05:11 PM
Trav3480
Problems/Service/Maintenance
0
Sep 28, 2015 02:46 PM
Infamous SC/SS
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
5
Sep 4, 2015 05:33 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 PM.