Adam's Tvs Build: 343 whp 300 tq
10-02-2009, 11:28 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 01-23-06
Location: on here
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Adam's Tvs Build: 343 whp 300 tq
Adam came to us back in the end of august because he wanted to take the next step with his car's performance. His car already had supporting cooling mods, full exhaust, Stage 3+ clutch, still running the stock pulley though. So we put together a list of parts to come up with a nice recipe for power...
tvs w/ 2.7" pulley
return style w/ 80's
ott 3" intake
e85
total for this was a hair over 2900 including the e85 and install.
Once we finally got a clear day for dyno time we took it in of the street for three pulls with no tuning.
10.7 afr 25 * timing
Pull 1 was 341 whp/ 296 wtq
Pull 3 was 342 whp/ 298 wtq
Pull 2 was 343 whp/ 300 wtq
Cool down time was 5 mins between runs in front of a box fan blowing a whopping 10 mph.
The car ran rich on the dyno by a full point (lack of airflow) so i think 350 is very possible with the right conditions.
Stock tb, head, cams, motor.
Iat 2's were 150 after 5 runs on the dyno
Iat 2's on the street peaked at 128* 68* ambient temps
tvs w/ 2.7" pulley
return style w/ 80's
ott 3" intake
e85
total for this was a hair over 2900 including the e85 and install.
Once we finally got a clear day for dyno time we took it in of the street for three pulls with no tuning.
10.7 afr 25 * timing
Pull 1 was 341 whp/ 296 wtq
Pull 3 was 342 whp/ 298 wtq
Pull 2 was 343 whp/ 300 wtq
Cool down time was 5 mins between runs in front of a box fan blowing a whopping 10 mph.
The car ran rich on the dyno by a full point (lack of airflow) so i think 350 is very possible with the right conditions.
Stock tb, head, cams, motor.
Iat 2's were 150 after 5 runs on the dyno
Iat 2's on the street peaked at 128* 68* ambient temps
Last edited by lsjwannabe; 10-02-2009 at 04:29 PM.
j/k, good job OTTP 
10-02-2009, 02:24 PM
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-05-06
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK thats awesomesauce, and I don't want to thread jack but -- E85 is 45 minutes to an hour away from me, at its closest point here in TX. For some reason we suck ***** on this front, i digress...
Would it be possible to get a similar result, although obviously not as high numbers, using 93 + meth? I dropped off the forum for a couple months and it seems like everyone is all over E85 and I can't hop on the bandwagon!
Would it be possible to get a similar result, although obviously not as high numbers, using 93 + meth? I dropped off the forum for a couple months and it seems like everyone is all over E85 and I can't hop on the bandwagon!
10-02-2009, 02:29 PM
#19
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: 09-14-08
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
meth should do just fine for ya.. just may wanna up ur ratio to say 75/25 or 80/20 and u shouldnt see much of a difference between the meth and e85... alot depends on supporting mods of course..
