Best header & DP options?
Best header & DP options?
I've been looking at header & downpipes for my '07 SS/SC but can't make up my mind. What are you running & why do you like it? I'm wanting to go with a 3" no cat downpipe & 3" custom catback exhaust.
Give me some ideas...
Give me some ideas...
If you plan on running a 2.7" or 2.6" pulley on the m62 with other supporting mods, then you may as well go with the 3" exhaust or if you plan on going Turbo or TVS with your car. If you do not have any plans like that then you won't need a 3" exhaust as you'll probably just be losing WHP.
I would recommend the CIA (Clear Image Automotive) H/DP Combo. Gasketless setup with GREAT workmanship and welds. It fits perfect and I doubt you'll have any trouble with it like you may see on some of the other combos out there.
Just my .02.
I would recommend the CIA (Clear Image Automotive) H/DP Combo. Gasketless setup with GREAT workmanship and welds. It fits perfect and I doubt you'll have any trouble with it like you may see on some of the other combos out there.
Just my .02.
you will lose power with a 3" cat back..
a 3" downpipe with a 2.5" cat back would be a good setup for you.
I have the mid length / 3" dp from clear image for sale if you are interested.
a 3" downpipe with a 2.5" cat back would be a good setup for you.
I have the mid length / 3" dp from clear image for sale if you are interested.
Last edited by ShortStack; May 28, 2009 at 02:28 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
for now i would stick with your 2.5" catback and just buy headers and a downpipe so you dont lose too much backpressure. you can run a 3" downpipe fine though. im going to get a vibrant header/dp combo, the downpipe is 2.5" tho. If your set on getting a 3" downpipe i would check out the cti header/dp combo or get some CA headers with an xtc downpipe. here are some links. the CA headers are on ebay for like $215 by the way. I'm not sure why cobalt-addiction has a higher price for them listed on their website.
http://cobalt-addiction.com/performance.htm
http://www.ottperformance.com/Cobalt...duct_info.html
http://www.turbotechracing.com/produ...dcategory=5617
http://cobalt-addiction.com/performance.htm
http://www.ottperformance.com/Cobalt...duct_info.html
http://www.turbotechracing.com/produ...dcategory=5617
^^ Back pressure has nothing to with it.. Actually... back pressure is bad.
How can it be a good thing if you have air BACKING UP... you want to flow as much air as possible... and since back pressure is a restriction.. back pressure is bad...
switching to a 3" cat back makes you lose air velocity, which is important... the faster air can get out, faster new air can get in...
How can it be a good thing if you have air BACKING UP... you want to flow as much air as possible... and since back pressure is a restriction.. back pressure is bad...
switching to a 3" cat back makes you lose air velocity, which is important... the faster air can get out, faster new air can get in...
Last edited by ShortStack; May 28, 2009 at 02:33 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
for now i would stick with your 2.5" catback and just buy headers and a downpipe so you dont lose too much backpressure. you can run a 3" downpipe fine though. im going to get a vibrant header/dp combo, the downpipe is 2.5" tho. If your set on getting a 3" downpipe i would check out the cti header/dp combo or get some CA headers with an xtc downpipe. here are some links. the CA headers are on ebay for like $215 by the way. I'm not sure why cobalt-addiction has a higher price for them listed on their website.
http://cobalt-addiction.com/performance.htm
http://www.ottperformance.com/Cobalt...duct_info.html
http://www.turbotechracing.com/produ...dcategory=5617
http://cobalt-addiction.com/performance.htm
http://www.ottperformance.com/Cobalt...duct_info.html
http://www.turbotechracing.com/produ...dcategory=5617
Back pressure is bad scavenging good
good read http://www.ssheaders.com/header.htm
i want to run a 3" exhaust just for the deep sound, but i dont want to kill savaging , id like the find the optimal length and size the down pipe needs to be, then from the downpipe back run 3".
as far as the best header...who knows , someone should do a comparo of all the mid length. the pacesetter is best bang for buck.The clear image seems to be best quality/bang for buck, and i think they have the only full length (other than wepon-r)
If you plan on running a 2.7" or 2.6" pulley on the m62 with other supporting mods, then you may as well go with the 3" exhaust or if you plan on going Turbo or TVS with your car. If you do not have any plans like that then you won't need a 3" exhaust as you'll probably just be losing WHP.
I would recommend the CIA (Clear Image Automotive) H/DP Combo. Gasketless setup with GREAT workmanship and welds. It fits perfect and I doubt you'll have any trouble with it like you may see on some of the other combos out there.
Just my .02.
I would recommend the CIA (Clear Image Automotive) H/DP Combo. Gasketless setup with GREAT workmanship and welds. It fits perfect and I doubt you'll have any trouble with it like you may see on some of the other combos out there.
Just my .02.
^^ Back pressure has nothing to with it.. Actually... back pressure is bad.
How can it be a good thing if you have air BACKING UP... you want to flow as much air as possible... and since back pressure is a restriction.. back pressure is bad...
switching to a 3" cat back makes you lose air velocity, which is important... the faster air can get out, faster new air can get in...
How can it be a good thing if you have air BACKING UP... you want to flow as much air as possible... and since back pressure is a restriction.. back pressure is bad...
switching to a 3" cat back makes you lose air velocity, which is important... the faster air can get out, faster new air can get in...
You won't need a 3" exhaust..
If you go with a CTI H/Dp you may be waiting awhile on them as they take for ******* ever.
ZZP's primaries on their header make it a complete bitch to put the stock studs back in without having to grind a little bit off the stud to make them work nicely.
Basically they will all get you the gains you want. I had the ZZP h/dp for a while and then I went with the CIA h/dp. Same Performance. I just think the CIA is of better quality, nice welds, etc..
If you go with a CTI H/Dp you may be waiting awhile on them as they take for ******* ever.
ZZP's primaries on their header make it a complete bitch to put the stock studs back in without having to grind a little bit off the stud to make them work nicely.
Basically they will all get you the gains you want. I had the ZZP h/dp for a while and then I went with the CIA h/dp. Same Performance. I just think the CIA is of better quality, nice welds, etc..
can we say over priced?
im sorry but i just cant see some tubes and welds costing that much. i understand you have to pay for th research and people have to make money but i mean come on.
im sorry but i just cant see some tubes and welds costing that much. i understand you have to pay for th research and people have to make money but i mean come on.
***FLAME SUIT ON***
in my opinion...and will remain my opinion till i see concert proof of its gains(stock dyno,vortex dyno same car) i think
JBP VORTEX =

its theory is sound until you add fluid dynamics.
Last edited by phatnackySS; May 28, 2009 at 04:05 PM.
People lost whp on that header.. I'm not sure what the under the curve hp was or what the gains were, but I know at peak.. If I recall correctly, people lost peak whp from previous dynos with other exhaust setups.
its a long tube header, point of long tube max gain. but its designed to fit like a shorty. point of shorty header? to keep the stock down pipe and cat. your not gonna get max performance with stock DP and cat, so you end up buying a new DP and high flow, or ditch the cat all together , which defeats the point. so you spend 400 bucks + x amount for DP and your still not gonna see the same gains you would see with a normal header. pulse just to add insult to injury its a pain in the ass to install.
it may physically be equal length , but fluid dose not like to change direction, when it dose charge direction it slows down ,with all those different bends you end up more uneven exhasut pulse than you would with unequal length manifold. what proof do i have?
the fact its made of equal length pipe but sounds like a damn boxer engine. if you don't want to give up your stock cat/DP, your better off with normal shorty. as said befor the theory is sound if you dont take into account fluid dynamics.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
importkiller
Problems/Service/Maintenance
11
Sep 30, 2015 07:18 PM



