Brfps
Does your car go super lean in 4th gear?
maxed out 80s at top of third on E...granted im a little rich cuz i needs the help with the fuel trims

Return style is a must...will be the only thing allowing me to pulley down or even install my ported head on this fuel
skatin...i would love to see your tune file man...i am totally new to the e85 tuning...send me an email if you wouldnt mind
vwatson@peerlessmfg.com
vwatson@peerlessmfg.com
Vaughn, bump that baby up to 25!
Must be nice to have E85 around. The low octane is killing my TVS fun lol. I have E85 about 20 miles away (the opposite way of where I work and regularly go as well), but that's a long way just to drive for gas...
They both have thier strong point and both decent system, I have no experience with the fuel system changes as Im still stage 3 pushing out less than 17.5# pounds of boost.
Well thanks. I'm still trying to figure out what each's stong point is, and what is a better application for which type of setup. I'm going to likely need it so I can run my 2.8" TVS on E85.
If you want to run e85 from what I have read on the forum go with the return style so that you dont starve the number 4 cylinder thats what I have read and I dont know how Viable the source is.
The ZZP BRFPS should be plenty to run a 2.8" pulley on a TVS with E85. But it may not be enough to run a 2.6".
That is what I would base my purchase on if I where you.
Most people think it has to do with the cooling pockets around the #4 cylinder. That is the reason GM increased the cooling capacity of the Gen II ecotec block by .5L.
Last edited by ebristol; Jul 22, 2010 at 10:25 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Good to know that's why I said I didnt know how viable the information was thanks for the input!
It mainly depends on how far you want to push your fuel system.
The ZZP BRFPS should be plenty to run a 2.8" pulley on a TVS with E85. But it may not be enough to run a 2.6".
That is what I would base my purchase on if I where you.
No one has proved that the failure of #4 is because of fuel starvation. That is a forum rumor.
Most people think it has to do with the cooling pockets around the #4 cylinder. That is the reason GM increased the cooling capacity of the Gen II ecotec block by .5L.
The ZZP BRFPS should be plenty to run a 2.8" pulley on a TVS with E85. But it may not be enough to run a 2.6".
That is what I would base my purchase on if I where you.
No one has proved that the failure of #4 is because of fuel starvation. That is a forum rumor.
Most people think it has to do with the cooling pockets around the #4 cylinder. That is the reason GM increased the cooling capacity of the Gen II ecotec block by .5L.
So if common sense reads right from your post, the return style will flow a whole lot more? Two pulley sizes doesn't seem like a lot...
Is the LSJ block a Gen II block? (Over the Cavalier Ecotecs?)
Thanks for the insight. Can you explain how each system works? What their intended application is? Tuning issues with both? How about boost reference with return style?
So if common sense reads right from your post, the return style will flow a whole lot more? Two pulley sizes doesn't seem like a lot...
So if common sense reads right from your post, the return style will flow a whole lot more? Two pulley sizes doesn't seem like a lot...
LSJ, L61, LK9 are Gen I.
LNF, LE5, LAF, LAP, LE9, LAT are all Gen II.
Thats kinda rude coming from the guy that demands proof of cars that have cracked 300whp, when many have done it years ago... Sorry, reading css.net jibberish is not 'research'... I'm not asking for you to write me a book, but some links or other info are helpful to myself as well as thousands of others on this website. I guess that's why this place is .nub and Cobalts are still slow...
Nobody wants to share anything to advance our cars.
Nobody wants to share anything to advance our cars.
Thats kinda rude coming from the guy that demands proof of cars that have cracked 300whp, when many have done it years ago... Sorry, reading css.net jibberish is not 'research'... I'm not asking for you to write me a book, but some links or other info are helpful to myself as well as thousands of others on this website. I guess that's why this place is .nub and Cobalts are still slow...
Nobody wants to share anything to advance our cars.
Nobody wants to share anything to advance our cars.
Kids...
I am not demanding anything. I asked who has broke 300 and let people throw out all the names. Then I did my research to find the truth. w/e
I have provided more information in this thread then everyone else combined. And your going to call me out? lol
</threadjack>
How about some fuel system tech talk!
Last edited by csementuh; Jul 22, 2010 at 02:00 PM.


