Diffrence from 2.9 to 2.8
Diffrence from 2.9 to 2.8
Hey guys,
To start of I'm on stage 2 injectors (42.5lb) and yes I've read all about the IDC use and everything. The IAT2 temp debate and everything involving smaller pulleys on 42.5lb injectors.
I have an aeroforce to monitor the IAT2 temps.
I'll soon have a wideband sensor to hook up to said aeroforce.
And as I don't race all the time the injectors will be fine excedpt when I go WOT at the track or back roads once in a blue moon. And since stage 2 runs rich leaning out the a/f ratio by capping injectors at 100% should be fine.
So the question is how much extra boost and power should I see by going from a 2.9 Nates to a 2.8 Nates?
To start of I'm on stage 2 injectors (42.5lb) and yes I've read all about the IDC use and everything. The IAT2 temp debate and everything involving smaller pulleys on 42.5lb injectors.
I have an aeroforce to monitor the IAT2 temps.
I'll soon have a wideband sensor to hook up to said aeroforce.
And as I don't race all the time the injectors will be fine excedpt when I go WOT at the track or back roads once in a blue moon. And since stage 2 runs rich leaning out the a/f ratio by capping injectors at 100% should be fine.
So the question is how much extra boost and power should I see by going from a 2.9 Nates to a 2.8 Nates?
Hey guys,
To start of I'm on stage 2 injectors (42.5lb) and yes I've read all about the IDC use and everything. The IAT2 temp debate and everything involving smaller pulleys on 42.5lb injectors.
I have an aeroforce to monitor the IAT2 temps.
I'll soon have a wideband sensor to hook up to said aeroforce.
And as I don't race all the time the injectors will be fine excedpt when I go WOT at the track or back roads once in a blue moon. And since stage 2 runs rich leaning out the a/f ratio by capping injectors at 100% should be fine.
So the question is how much extra boost and power should I see by going from a 2.9 Nates to a 2.8 Nates?
To start of I'm on stage 2 injectors (42.5lb) and yes I've read all about the IDC use and everything. The IAT2 temp debate and everything involving smaller pulleys on 42.5lb injectors.
I have an aeroforce to monitor the IAT2 temps.
I'll soon have a wideband sensor to hook up to said aeroforce.
And as I don't race all the time the injectors will be fine excedpt when I go WOT at the track or back roads once in a blue moon. And since stage 2 runs rich leaning out the a/f ratio by capping injectors at 100% should be fine.
So the question is how much extra boost and power should I see by going from a 2.9 Nates to a 2.8 Nates?
Oh...My IDC @ WOT @ 7000 rpm @ 16 ms IPW = +/- 90 %
cheers
Well seeing as you are lucky enough to live in Florida and are pretty much at sea level I would think +/- 19 psi. Here in Calgary we are at 3500' SL and I see +/1 16 psi @ WOT. You probably wont see much in the way of HP gains but your low end TQ will be improved. I have a 2.85" pulley and my TQ is incredable so much so I adjusted my TQ management to compensate in 1st and second gears.
Oh...My IDC @ WOT @ 7000 rpm @ 16 ms IPW = +/- 90 %
cheers
Oh...My IDC @ WOT @ 7000 rpm @ 16 ms IPW = +/- 90 %
cheers
I figured a 2.85 or a 2.8 would be fine because I can monitor it. I'll still have the 2.9 and stage 2 pulley in case it gets bad.
Right now with the 2.9 I see 16 to 17 pounds at the the 5300 to 7000rpm range and 15lbs instant on the gas.
So an extra 2 pounds maybe?
I remember some one saying for every pound of boost on our cars equals an extra 7hp so 14 hp?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



