2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

dyno pull

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 08:22 PM
  #1  
bulletpound's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-06-09
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: .
dyno pull

okay i dont know whats wrong but here it goes...i did 3 pulls on a dyno jet SAE corrected.

i got
run 1) 230whp/214wtq
run 2) 232 whp/217wtq
run 3) 232whp/216wtq

my mods are
2.8
60lbs
colder plugs 0.32
stg 2 belt
OTTP h/e
OTTP dual pass
Opt. b
RAW CAI
JBP header
CTI dp 3inch
vibrant cat-back 3inch
custom tune.

WOT im 11.4-6 and 20*, and my iat2s are 140 with no knock.

so whats wrong that im not making good power?? is it my JBP header and 3 inch exhaust??. i no its not the tune. or is it my RAW 3inch intake?? i dont understand.....help
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 08:25 PM
  #2  
StockSS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-07-08
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Mtown NJ
lol lol lol lol
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 08:25 PM
  #3  
rockSTAR_SS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 10-19-07
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 2
From: South Mississippi
Those mods should only help you, not hurt you.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 08:29 PM
  #4  
freakta's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-07
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
From: milton ma
im guessing its the tune... or something could be a bit clogged up. when i first ran my header dp combo we lost like 20 or so hp... we were doing everything we could think of and then i figured why not cut out the cat... it was clogged pretty bad. not soo bad to raise my boost but bad enough to kill my top end... check whatever you can and see if anything is clogged
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 08:45 PM
  #5  
bulletpound's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-06-09
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: .
yes i no but i dont understand why the hp is so low..... the plugs look fine. only thing i can think of is the jbp header since its 1.625 primaries and my exhaust is full 3inch....

the cat is new and its fine.. could it be my car stock was just ****..?

Last edited by bulletpound; Jul 30, 2009 at 08:45 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:02 PM
  #6  
freakta's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-07
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
From: milton ma
did you tune it before or after the intake and exhuast
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:05 PM
  #7  
bulletpound's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-06-09
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: .
installed everything and tuned after. and something else i forgot to mention. we forgot to finish the timing table past 6300rpm so after 6300 the timing drop from 21* to 19*, and my rev limit is at 7200 would that be why im getting low numbers?? is it that big of a diff if we didnt forget to finish the table would i see 250whp?? so pretty much 1000rpm and 2* timing diff makes that much??
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:11 PM
  #8  
slowswap's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-25-08
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
From: Depew, NY
Check the cat if you have one. IAT2's seem to high.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:15 PM
  #9  
freakta's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-07
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
From: milton ma
my m62 with 3in pulley meth and some more supporting mods made 255 so im guessing you should be up there.
without meth it made 239 so either way youve got to be more than that
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:17 PM
  #10  
slowswap's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-25-08
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
From: Depew, NY
**** my buddies with 2.8, intake and tune made 260 whp.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:17 PM
  #11  
freakta's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-07
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
From: milton ma
my m62 with 3in pulley meth and some more supporting mods made 255 so im guessing you should be up there.
without meth it made 239 so either way youve got to be more than that
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:20 PM
  #12  
bulletpound's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-06-09
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: .
something else i forgot to mention. we forgot to finish the timing table past 6300rpm so after 6300 the timing drop from 21* to 19*, and my rev limit is at 7200 would that be why im getting low numbers?? is it that big of a diff if we didnt forget to finish the table would i see 250whp?? so pretty much 1000rpm and 2* timing diff makes that much??
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:20 PM
  #13  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
I made 262 on a 2.85, tune, 42s, GM header, ZZP Downpipe, and 2.5" exhaust
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:25 PM
  #14  
STS2/SS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 03-06-08
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Ledyard, CT
If you have a cat GET RID OF IT!!!
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:26 PM
  #15  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
I had a cat on my car up to the day I got rid of it!
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:28 PM
  #16  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
i made 257 IIRC with a 2.85








on a mustang dyno.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:29 PM
  #17  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by hatrickstu
i made 257 IIRC with a 2.85








on a mustang dyno.
u'r gay! Your arguement is invalid!
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:29 PM
  #18  
STS2/SS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 03-06-08
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Ledyard, CT
I made 268 and 242 with a 2.7 and 60's with my intake manifold and no meth. On Freds dyno which has been dubed the hart breaker!
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:31 PM
  #19  
bulletpound's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-06-09
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: .
please read my above post im not asking for what pplz have dynod
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:33 PM
  #20  
GTPUSER's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-27-06
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Take it to a different dyno and report back to us, it might not be the car
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:34 PM
  #21  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC
u'r gay! Your arguement is invalid!
because its on a less forgiving dyno. i call shens. i hate dyno numbers altogether
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:35 PM
  #22  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
I happen to like dyno numbers... so I can see how far I have come......

I still haz more powerz than you!
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:37 PM
  #23  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by GTPUSER
Take it to a different dyno and report back to us, it might not be the car
or just take it to the track. thats where real power is shown, not computer generated numbers. mph at the track separates the real numbers from the dyno braggers.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:37 PM
  #24  
SuperSport4's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-28-06
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Miami
well i dunno wut hp numbers i was putting down, but it was running pretty hard.... i had wuts on my sig now and i was running 12.0 AFR's and about 25* of timing with no knock..... dunno y cuz i hear ppl only being able to run like 20* with that pulley
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 09:37 PM
  #25  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC
I happen to like dyno numbers... so I can see how far I have come......

I still haz more powerz than you!
and im still faster
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:32 PM.