getting a ss s/c, any advice?
getting a ss s/c, any advice?
well after having my LT for a year, i ve decided on getting the ss s/c. you guys have any advice about the car? this will be my very 1st f/i car. i ve never paid that much attention to the 2.0 threads. so know i ve started reading them...and theres a lot to read!!!! so you guys have any DOs and DON'Ts with the car? is the breaking in period the same with the ss s/c as with the LT (500 miles babying it). any and all advice will be helpful! thanks guys
well being that it is a production vehilce.. it will work just like a production vehilce, no extra maintence required.
only word of caution, if you sense wheel hop, let off the throttle quick!
only word of caution, if you sense wheel hop, let off the throttle quick!
never mind i found the some answers:
Benefits:
Greatly improved off-the-line acceleration Reduced wheel hop
Improved vehicle stability
Reduced shock loads on driveline components
Smoother shifting
Reduced wear on exhaust system joints
Less vibration transmission to the driver compared to polyurethane motor mounts.
Less shock load, compared to torque straps and chains.
Drifting helps reduce shock loads when wheels gain traction.
Reduces motor movement decreases the chance of motor parts rubbing against the hood and frame.
i'm not sure of the common belief in this forum but i'm gonna give my opinion on the break in anyway.
motors are machined a lot more precisely than they used to be, closer tolerances and materials that are far superior than the time when the accepted break in method was started. cylinders are honed using a cross-hatch pattern, with the pistons going up and down in the cylinders the rings rub against this cross-hatch pattern. the cylinders work like a file against the rings. you only get one chance to break it in. by babying the car for the first 500-1000 miles or whatever anyones method is, doesn't make use of this "file" in the cylinders. you need to vary rpm, some wot, some high rev shifts, lots of stop and go. not varying rpm will hinder later performance, you should drive the car how you intend on driving it later. the rings rely on equalized pressure, not their on strength. i don't feel like writing a novel, but if anyone would like links to sites where people have done studies on this say so and i will post them. things become obsolete, people once thought the world was flat and our planet was the center of our galaxy.
motors are machined a lot more precisely than they used to be, closer tolerances and materials that are far superior than the time when the accepted break in method was started. cylinders are honed using a cross-hatch pattern, with the pistons going up and down in the cylinders the rings rub against this cross-hatch pattern. the cylinders work like a file against the rings. you only get one chance to break it in. by babying the car for the first 500-1000 miles or whatever anyones method is, doesn't make use of this "file" in the cylinders. you need to vary rpm, some wot, some high rev shifts, lots of stop and go. not varying rpm will hinder later performance, you should drive the car how you intend on driving it later. the rings rely on equalized pressure, not their on strength. i don't feel like writing a novel, but if anyone would like links to sites where people have done studies on this say so and i will post them. things become obsolete, people once thought the world was flat and our planet was the center of our galaxy.
^There s an article about that somewhere? Anyone got a link? The first ten miles are most important too.
What other things do we need to worry about except oil changes?
What other things do we need to worry about except oil changes?
Last edited by PolishPauL; Feb 24, 2007 at 02:11 PM.
http://www.mototuneusa.com/break_in_secrets.htm
yeah im gonna agree with breaking it in like wesessiah said, i broke mine in like that, i drove it like i was gonna drive it. With 3,000 miles on the odo and still on my first oil change, i put down 236 WHP, and thats with zero mods.
There is no break in period requried on new cars. Trust me, by the time you get the car (even if it says it only has 5 miles on it) those rings are already sealed. To prove this point I compression tested my ecotec when I got it off the truck (.8miles on it)...Compression tested it again at 1000 miles (when i did my first oil change) and noticed absolutly no change.
There is no break in period requried on new cars. Trust me, by the time you get the car (even if it says it only has 5 miles on it) those rings are already sealed. To prove this point I compression tested my ecotec when I got it off the truck (.8miles on it)...Compression tested it again at 1000 miles (when i did my first oil change) and noticed absolutly no change.
No offense, but i think i trust that guy more. Hes tested way more than one car.
well after having my LT for a year, i ve decided on getting the ss s/c. you guys have any advice about the car? this will be my very 1st f/i car. i ve never paid that much attention to the 2.0 threads. so know i ve started reading them...and theres a lot to read!!!! so you guys have any DOs and DON'Ts with the car? is the breaking in period the same with the ss s/c as with the LT (500 miles babying it). any and all advice will be helpful! thanks guys

btw Doc, maybe i ll beable to get my DC strut bar on the new car, since i never got it on my LThuh? wheel hop on your base? i m a fast accelerator with my bolt and i ve never experienced it! when i say fast accelerator i mean 0~60 as fast as my 'bolt well get me there!
Last edited by artawesome; Mar 6, 2007 at 11:36 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost


