2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Going for a Dyno Pull

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 11:39 AM
  #51  
stoon_cobalt_colby's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-14-08
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
lol those numbers are way off even if there is a tune.... look at dyno thread ppl with 2.9,header,dp,h/e,t are putting down around the numbers u posted just saying no way in hell numbers are even close to right
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 12:03 PM
  #52  
Bluelightning's Avatar
Got Bewst?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 03-16-10
Posts: 10,948
Likes: 33
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Originally Posted by stoon_cobalt_colby
lol those numbers are way off even if there is a tune.... look at dyno thread ppl with 2.9,header,dp,h/e,t are putting down around the numbers u posted just saying no way in hell numbers are even close to right
Lol i knew this was gonna ruffle everyones feathers
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 12:22 PM
  #53  
yellow dragon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-01-10
Posts: 3,741
Likes: 7
From: Winnipeg, MB
Originally Posted by Bluelightning
Lol i knew this was gonna ruffle everyones feathers
No Prob. I am wearing flame retardant clothes. Besides everyone is entitled to their own opinions that is the whole point of the fourms right. I know what I saw and whats on my car(for the most part) and I have the Dyno sheet, once you do your 2 runs we;ll see maybe it is off calibration, who knows.All I know is I am happy It has always felt fast and pulls hard.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 01:22 PM
  #54  
07MetallicSC's Avatar
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: 09-29-06
Posts: 20,663
Likes: 216
From: Land of Freedom
Corrected numbers or no
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 01:29 PM
  #55  
stoon_cobalt_colby's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-14-08
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
lol oh no worries im not flamming at all justing saying dyno is very very very happy or completely fucked up to read those number thats all im saying i could care less about dynos cuz if urs is dynoing 250whp.... mines prob not even that with mods i have..track times prove more than dyno. i ran 14.28 @ 102mph i know not very impressive but our track sucks and has zero prep so put both together hard to pull a good time
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 01:47 PM
  #56  
yellow dragon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-01-10
Posts: 3,741
Likes: 7
From: Winnipeg, MB
Originally Posted by stoon_cobalt_colby
lol oh no worries im not flamming at all justing saying dyno is very very very happy or completely fucked up to read those number thats all im saying i could care less about dynos cuz if urs is dynoing 250whp.... mines prob not even that with mods i have..track times prove more than dyno. i ran 14.28 @ 102mph i know not very impressive but our track sucks and has zero prep so put both together hard to pull a good time
Thats a good time I would love to do that well. On friday I hope to hit 14's.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 01:55 PM
  #57  
Mclovin23's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-13-09
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
yeah seems pretty unbelievable but you got the dyno sheets to show it i guess. i would take it to another dyno and see what happens. if your getting 248 on a mustang you would get like mid 260whp on a dynojet. lol.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 02:12 PM
  #58  
arellano201's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 11-29-09
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Central Valley,Ca
And didn't you say that you were pushing 11 PSI on some other thread after that K&N Filter and 13.5 before you installled it?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 02:15 PM
  #59  
yellow dragon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-01-10
Posts: 3,741
Likes: 7
From: Winnipeg, MB
Originally Posted by arellano201
And didn't you say that you were pushing 11 PSI on some other thread after that K&N Filter and 13.5 before you installled it?
Yep I am so stumped!
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 02:22 PM
  #60  
blk06cbltss's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-12-09
Posts: 1,927
Likes: 0
From: tacoma wa
its the ss.net sticker giving him those numbers haha
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 02:26 PM
  #61  
rallycobalt06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-01-06
Posts: 19,671
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
Originally Posted by Mclovin23
yeah seems pretty unbelievable but you got the dyno sheets to show it i guess. i would take it to another dyno and see what happens. if your getting 248 on a mustang you would get like mid 260whp on a dynojet. lol.
that myth is hit or miss.... mostly miss.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 02:43 PM
  #62  
Bluelightning's Avatar
Got Bewst?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 03-16-10
Posts: 10,948
Likes: 33
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Originally Posted by Love_my_SS
Yep I am so stumped!
Boost is a measurement of restriction
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 02:45 PM
  #63  
arellano201's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 11-29-09
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Central Valley,Ca
I wish my K&N Filter would give me 40 more horses
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 02:47 PM
  #64  
yellow dragon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-01-10
Posts: 3,741
Likes: 7
From: Winnipeg, MB
Originally Posted by blk06cbltss
its the ss.net sticker giving him those numbers haha
Yep you figured out my secret!
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 02:56 PM
  #65  
Bluelightning's Avatar
Got Bewst?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 03-16-10
Posts: 10,948
Likes: 33
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Originally Posted by arellano201
I wish my K&N Filter would give me 40 more horses
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 03:05 PM
  #66  
Perfect.disguise's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 6,780
Likes: 0
From: .
As mentioned on a Mustang dyno that's not inflated your car should put down 200whp or less. A 93mph trap is proof enough that it's not 250whp.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 03:05 PM
  #67  
yellow dragon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-01-10
Posts: 3,741
Likes: 7
From: Winnipeg, MB
[/IMG]

[/IMG]
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 03:32 PM
  #68  
spitefulxcheerio's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-13-09
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: Boca Raton
Originally Posted by Perfect.disguise
As mentioned on a Mustang dyno that's not inflated your car should put down 200whp or less. A 93mph trap is proof enough that it's not 250whp.
didnt I say that a whole page ago?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 03:37 PM
  #69  
yellow dragon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-01-10
Posts: 3,741
Likes: 7
From: Winnipeg, MB
Originally Posted by spitefulxcheerio
didnt I say that a whole page ago?
Yep!
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 03:49 PM
  #70  
Perfect.disguise's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 6,780
Likes: 0
From: .
Originally Posted by Perfect.disguise
As mentioned on a Mustang dyno that's not inflated your car should put down 200whp or less. A 93mph trap is proof enough that it's not 250whp.
Originally Posted by spitefulxcheerio
didnt I say that a whole page ago?
This?
Originally Posted by spitefulxcheerio
one question, how the hell did you run a 15.1 with that much hp? I was just at the strip before I got my new setup that's in my sig (running GMS2, 3" intake and a 3" catback). When I got a 2.3 60' time, I ran a 14.0 @ 100. With a 1.9 60' I went for a 13.5 @ 105

No you didn't. I mentioned trap which is an indication of horsepower, not your ET. I've seen a KB Cobra run in the 15's before.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 03:54 PM
  #71  
spitefulxcheerio's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-13-09
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: Boca Raton
hope you don't think I'm trying to be a jerk man! I just want you to know what your car can actually do so you don't get your hopes up. In stock form, I think the fastest SS/SC 1/4 was 14.2 - 14.0. Something like that!

Have fun working on your launching! !4's are completely possible with what you have. Try preloading the driveline: when staging at the strip, put your rpms where you want them and then pull your e-brake all the way up. Let the clutch out till you feel the car kinda squat on it's ass...like it wants to go. Then when the tree comes down, right at green, let off the e-brake and come off the clutch (dont pop it but don't bitch it) using around half throttle. once you're out of the clutch, full throttle your way down the track. Boom, you just got a 1.9 60' time

EDIT: disguise, I was referring to the trap. A lower 60' time means youre spinning for longer and thus will have a lower trap (less distance to travel the further you go spinning). That's what I was referencing when I spoke about 60' times
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 04:00 PM
  #72  
yellow dragon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-01-10
Posts: 3,741
Likes: 7
From: Winnipeg, MB
Originally Posted by spitefulxcheerio
hope you don't think I'm trying to be a jerk man! I just want you to know what your car can actually do so you don't get your hopes up. In stock form, I think the fastest SS/SC 1/4 was 14.2 - 14.0. Something like that!

Have fun working on your launching! !4's are completely possible with what you have. Try preloading the driveline: when staging at the strip, put your rpms where you want them and then pull your e-brake all the way up. Let the clutch out till you feel the car kinda squat on it's ass...like it wants to go. Then when the tree comes down, right at green, let off the e-brake and come off the clutch (dont pop it but don't bitch it) using around half throttle. once you're out of the clutch, full throttle your way down the track. Boom, you just got a 1.9 60' time

EDIT: disguise, I was referring to the trap. A lower 60' time means youre spinning for longer and thus will have a lower trap (less distance to travel the further you go spinning). That's what I was referencing when I spoke about 60' times
No worries man. I know this is a good debate. My 15.1 is my driving. Not use to going ***** out without looking for cops. I need launch work and I always hit the limiter so that all affects time probably a 1/2 second there. Just need practice. I will and have said I was very surprised by the numbers I was expecting 215 based on research through this forum so when I saw 248.8 I almost crapped my pants cuz i did not expect that at all. The warm up run to 5k was 229.3 so if I avg the 2 runs it works out to 239.35 which is still high ;(
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 04:02 PM
  #73  
Perfect.disguise's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 6,780
Likes: 0
From: .
Originally Posted by spitefulxcheerio
EDIT: disguise, I was referring to the trap. A lower 60' time means youre spinning for longer and thus will have a lower trap (less distance to travel the further you go spinning). That's what I was referencing when I spoke about 60' times
I don't get what your saying? A lower 60' means your getting more traction/a better launch. Heavy spinning usually results in a higher trap.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 04:14 PM
  #74  
Bluelightning's Avatar
Got Bewst?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 03-16-10
Posts: 10,948
Likes: 33
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Originally Posted by spitefulxcheerio
Try preloading the driveline: when staging at the strip, put your rpms where you want them and then pull your e-brake all the way up. Let the clutch out till you feel the car kinda squat on it's ass...like it wants to go. Then when the tree comes down, right at green, let off the e-brake and come off the clutch (dont pop it but don't bitch it) using around half throttle. once you're out of the clutch, full throttle your way down the track. Boom, you just got a 1.9 60' time
I'm gonna have to try this on friday! Oh and i just made my appointment to be dynoed at the same place as love my ss on the 29th at 8:30am :

Last edited by Bluelightning; Sep 14, 2010 at 04:54 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 04:42 PM
  #75  
Render2009's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 07-25-09
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 0
From: Mt. Sterling Illinois
Originally Posted by Bluelightning
I'm gonna have to try this on friday! Oh and i just made my appointment to be dynoed at the same place as love my ss on the 29th at 8:30am :
with ur mods and that dyno im guess 300+ whp.. haha
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 PM.