2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

How small of a pulley?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 04:55 PM
  #1  
ChriSS/SC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-02-07
Posts: 5,531
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Question How small of a pulley?

Souldn't be too hard to answer my question.. But I just want to make the right decision and not f**k up my car haha. How small of a pulley can I run on my balt with GMstg2/Header/Downpipe/Cat-back/Intake? I have the GM stage 2 pulley on right now. Thanks.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 04:56 PM
  #2  
ShortStack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-16-08
Posts: 5,610
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, Fl
wouldnt go under what you have with the stage 2 tune... 3" lowest...
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:00 PM
  #3  
ChriSS/SC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-02-07
Posts: 5,531
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Really? Why? I thought supporting mods (i.e. bolt-ons) allowed for a possibly smaller pulley?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:01 PM
  #4  
DoubleLP's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-01-07
Posts: 3,740
Likes: 0
From: Calgary/Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada
You would need a serious tune and bigger injectors if you go smaller then the 3" pulley.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:02 PM
  #5  
YellowBalt06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-26-08
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
u can run a 2.9 and prolly be ok...multiple ppl are running the same setups...if u go 2.9 dont go any smaller no matter what
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:03 PM
  #6  
ChriSS/SC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-02-07
Posts: 5,531
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Good thing I posted this.. I was gonna go 2.85 or so.. Thanks guys..
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:05 PM
  #7  
YellowBalt06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-26-08
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
yah search and look...there prolly 100s of ppl running stage 2 with a 2.9 pulley and there fine
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:05 PM
  #8  
Bodychecker628's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-20-07
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
From: Auburn, Alabama
... 2.9 no problem with your setup... many people run that setup fine. If you drop to 2.8 get 60lb injectors and tune (can also get cooling mods but not necessary)
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:09 PM
  #9  
95cam86roc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-27-06
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
From: OH IO
Originally Posted by Bodychecker628
... 2.9 no problem with your setup... many people run that setup fine. If you drop to 2.8 get 60lb injectors and tune (can also get cooling mods but not necessary)
x2
I ran a 2.9 n 42s on a custom tune for a long time. But like said above i wouldnt go below that. You'll max out your injectors.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #10  
ChriSS/SC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-02-07
Posts: 5,531
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Alright so 2.9 is sounding convincing.. I really don't have the money for 60lb. injectors and a tune right now haha.. Gotta love Christmas

Originally Posted by 95cam86roc
x2
I ran a 2.9 n 42s on a custom tune for a long time. But like said above i wouldnt go below that. You'll max out your injectors.

I'm on the GM stg 2 tune though. Still safe to run a 2.9 right?

Last edited by ChriSS/SC; Nov 20, 2008 at 05:10 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:11 PM
  #11  
YellowBalt06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-26-08
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
yep totally safe man, just dont go under a 2.9
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:18 PM
  #12  
06sunburstss's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-24-08
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
yeah i am running a 2.9 on the stage two tune. Its fine
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:18 PM
  #13  
Scythe_Snake's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-06
Posts: 7,856
Likes: 21
From: Matteson, Illinois
2.85 is THE SMALLEST you want to go. Bottom line.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:19 PM
  #14  
ChriSS/SC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-02-07
Posts: 5,531
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Alright thanks people.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:19 PM
  #15  
invisible's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-22-06
Posts: 7,591
Likes: 1
From: In a house.
Not saying it was smart but i ran on a 2.8 with stg2 for a year. lol
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:20 PM
  #16  
Scythe_Snake's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-06
Posts: 7,856
Likes: 21
From: Matteson, Illinois
PS have a buddy that has been running 2.85 with stage 2 for over a year now, no problems.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:21 PM
  #17  
arkkornkid's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-07-08
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 1
From: TNARMS
I'm running a 2.85 that I bought from a friend that ran it for over a year without issues.

It bumped the torque up a bit, and my car runs smoother than it did with the stock stg2, but my gas mileage suffers for it= went from 27 to 23
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:21 PM
  #18  
invisible's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-22-06
Posts: 7,591
Likes: 1
From: In a house.
Mine was actually a 2.79 and it ran like a ****** beast.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:22 PM
  #19  
ChriSS/SC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-02-07
Posts: 5,531
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Scythe_Snake
PS have a buddy that has been running 2.85 with stage 2 for over a year now, no problems.

Hmm... Now I'm debating whether or not this is convincing enough for a 2.85

Most likely a 2.9 would be optimal. I will not be stupid and run too small of a pulley knowing that my car can't support it.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:27 PM
  #20  
arkkornkid's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-07-08
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 1
From: TNARMS
you'll need a cooling mod for sure

and I'm thinking of getting a 2.9 just to see if there's a difference
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:30 PM
  #21  
YellowBalt06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-26-08
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
2.9 is safest without cooling mods and bigger injectors...stay 2.9 man dont do a 2.85
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:48 PM
  #22  
ChriSS/SC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-02-07
Posts: 5,531
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Alright. Seems like 2.85 is borderline safe/unsafe for 42.5lb injectors. Looks like it will be a 2.9. Now my question is.. Are there any differences in performance from a 3.0 to 2.9? Noticeable? Anyone?....
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:49 PM
  #23  
YellowBalt06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-26-08
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Not really, maybe a little but not much..you might notice a little more boost psi but thats prolly it
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 05:57 PM
  #24  
ChriSS/SC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-02-07
Posts: 5,531
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Yeah that's what I thought man.. So I don't even know if its worth changing the pulley after all.. At least until I get 60's and a corresponding tune.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 06:00 PM
  #25  
YellowBalt06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-26-08
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
yeah u can tell a little difference but not much...i mean but for $50 bucks new or cheaper if u can find a used 2.9 its worth it...boost builds up a lil quicker than with the stage 2 pulley
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 AM.