http://s55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...t=3ec3a9fb.flv

 

Roflmao at the start

hmmm just me or did that not sound like a 500+hp pull.

 

Then my SS/NA with a catback and an exhaust must make 300...cuz that thing accelerated like old people ****...

 

someone changed the weight of the rollers

 

HAHAHA very funny

 

It's funny that it made it over here LOL

 

lol i love the beging

 

how can that be bullshit with video evidence? you can see it running

that beg was rediculous haha. i had my soung loud at work hahahaha

 

You can tell by their reaction that they set the dyno to read insane numbers. Plus its a mustang dyno, 518 hp on a mustang dyno is close to 600 on a dynojet.

 

why is a dynojet higher than a mustang? that doesnt make sense

 

I was just wondering how much horsepower can these engines take before you have to build them up...

 

If calibrated properly they both should read roughly the same. I think you sound like an idiot when you try to compare a Mustang to a DJ.

 

lmao at the beginning. unless that pull was in 12th gear it was way to long, they knew it was a joke. still funny though

 

thats what i figured.... sounded like a crazy statement, lol

 

about 300whp+ or -

 

same as out engies about.. its like 300-320whp.. is what i heard if your getting near 300 i would rebuild it somewhat just to be safe.

 

He's playing with the dyno.

The fuel and engine management system couldn't accomadate the fueling it would take to match that amount of airflow.

Stock airflow sensor maxxes near 400 crank HP. It can be changed though but I seriously doubt he did.

It is a built engine though but I think only the bottom end.

 

yea specially with that intro lol

 

"Well, hey, look! 500 Billion Horsepower!"

hahaha

 

Guys that's Alpha, what do you expect. Of course it's BS. Lol.

 

on a mustang dyno, you can make the rollers weigh 10k lbs, and the car weigh 1k lbs.

this will produce stupid high numbers.

 

I dyno'd on a Mustang dyno and I would only compare my car to other cars that ran on the same dyno in similar conditions.

What the hell do you mean by calibrated, though? A mustang dyno puts load on the vehicle similar to running on the street as opposed to dynojet that doesn't, that's why the numbers are lower. The only way a mustang would put out similar numbers is if you set it to add 15% to account for the loss on load. That's effectively the same thing as me saying, "I dyno'd 244/228 on a mustang, which would be apprx 280/262 on a dynojet." I don't see how you can say that "calibrated" is alright but doing the math yourself makes you look like an "idiot"...

 

I actually got a better result on a mustang over a dynojet once,one threw high numbers the other threw low.LOL

 

i guess you're over looking the facts that i posted.

 

That was the gayest intro to a vid from a guy EVER!