2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Just purchased the Twinscrew kit!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 10:55 AM
  #26  
R&C_rallySS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-09-06
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
From: PA
Congrats man. Will look forward to hearing more about the kit. Good luck with everything!
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 12:02 PM
  #27  
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-11-07
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
From: Az
One piece of advice. Conservative tune.

Originally Posted by chevysalesman614
nice. i wanted to be the first. but my wife and friends told me not to send him the certified check he requests until i know for sure he sent at least 1 out.
You're married?

Last edited by Onyxd04Redline; Aug 1, 2007 at 12:53 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 12:52 PM
  #28  
random1121's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-24-06
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: jersey
don't hate me for asking this....but it's for sale now? i know there's a thread already on this i know it's completed but i didn't know it was actaully for sale as of now
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #29  
quickspec's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 05-23-06
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Concrats BoominIt! When it's done we have to meet up for you can take me for a ride in it, where are you going to get it tuned at?
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 04:21 PM
  #30  
Vman81's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-24-05
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Question

wow, 3000 dollars for 20 horsepower!!! you can make close to 300 wheel on a stock blower with proper tuning and the methanol setup you already have. what do you do for a living? you must be a rocket scientist or something to be willing to spend that much money for such a small increase in power. not trying to be a smartass but you already made some great choices on modding your car, so why have you chosen to go this route for so much more money and so little gains?

its really not any of my business but i'm merely curious.

later,
vince.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 04:26 PM
  #31  
an0malous's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-06
Posts: 12,577
Likes: 2
From: Canada
because 300 on stock blower is tapped to the max

300 on this blower is just starting, the potential is FAR higher.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 04:29 PM
  #32  
chevysalesman614's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-03-06
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
One piece of advice. Conservative tune.



You're married?
yup. thats waht it means when i said "my wife"
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 04:35 PM
  #33  
OniMirage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-14-05
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
From: Phx, AZ
no pics just video
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 04:39 PM
  #34  
Vman81's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-24-05
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Originally Posted by an0malous
because 300 on stock blower is tapped to the max

300 on this blower is just starting, the potential is FAR higher.
whatever happened to people doing research before making a statement? twin screw blowers are less efficent in the lower rpm's and it takes a little more power to turn them. people are getting all psyched up because of the impressive numbers people make on mustangs and cobras with kenne bell blowers and such. the difference is that we have a small displacement four cylinder and the mustangs have v8's with over twice the displacement. so because of the difference in displacement, the motor isn't really affected by the more power it takes to turn the blower in lower rpm's thus yielding ridiculous gains. i do not see this setup ever making more than 320 without serious engine modifications.

just my .02
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 04:42 PM
  #35  
SilverSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-03-05
Posts: 4,272
Likes: 0
From: South Bend , Indiana
Hope all goes well for ya ...U2 billy . Cant wait to see the results and if my own personal theories hold true .
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 06:26 PM
  #36  
UmeNNis's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-15-07
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 0
From: Woodbridge, VA
Originally Posted by Vman81
whatever happened to people doing research before making a statement? twin screw blowers are less efficent in the lower rpm's and it takes a little more power to turn them. people are getting all psyched up because of the impressive numbers people make on mustangs and cobras with kenne bell blowers and such. the difference is that we have a small displacement four cylinder and the mustangs have v8's with over twice the displacement. so because of the difference in displacement, the motor isn't really affected by the more power it takes to turn the blower in lower rpm's thus yielding ridiculous gains. i do not see this setup ever making more than 320 without serious engine modifications.

just my .02
didn't someone already explain that although there is a higher parasitic loss on the ts, that it is only ~10-15 hp max? or maybe i'm just pulling **** out of my ass....

Why would you need 'serious engine modifications' to yield more than 320hp? makes no sense to me....
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 07:48 PM
  #37  
2K5SS/SC?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-08-05
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL
Originally Posted by Vman81
whatever happened to people doing research before making a statement? twin screw blowers are less efficent in the lower rpm's and it takes a little more power to turn them. people are getting all psyched up because of the impressive numbers people make on mustangs and cobras with kenne bell blowers and such. the difference is that we have a small displacement four cylinder and the mustangs have v8's with over twice the displacement. so because of the difference in displacement, the motor isn't really affected by the more power it takes to turn the blower in lower rpm's thus yielding ridiculous gains. i do not see this setup ever making more than 320 without serious engine modifications.

just my .02
Well, I could sit here and argue all night long on this lovely theory, but the true tuner would actually know that it's not all about the numbers for one. At least not the numbers you're looking at. I'm looking at displacement 1.0L vs 1.2L and the increase in CFM's I get from that per revolution. The thermal efficiency is also another benefit, but hey you just stick to your guns bro. I'll do the testing and tuning with all my add-ons and we'll see what blower really shines in the end. Not to mention the fact that we've barely scratched the surface with the amount of CFM's this thing has the potential to put out. In fact the only reason I didn't go turbo for the extra CFM's was the fact I wanted to keep my car a SUPERCHARGED Cobalt! To each his own I guess.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 12:43 AM
  #38  
BoomInIt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 07-24-05
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: new orleans
Originally Posted by 2K5SS/SC?
Well, I could sit here and argue all night long on this lovely theory, but the true tuner would actually know that it's not all about the numbers for one. At least not the numbers you're looking at. I'm looking at displacement 1.0L vs 1.2L and the increase in CFM's I get from that per revolution. The thermal efficiency is also another benefit, but hey you just stick to your guns bro. I'll do the testing and tuning with all my add-ons and we'll see what blower really shines in the end. Not to mention the fact that we've barely scratched the surface with the amount of CFM's this thing has the potential to put out. In fact the only reason I didn't go turbo for the extra CFM's was the fact I wanted to keep my car a SUPERCHARGED Cobalt! To each his own I guess.

Agreed... I don't think I would purchase this for no reason. More flow, cooler temps, more HP/tqlbs
It takes 2000hp to turn supercharger drag cars, but you don't see them complaining about robbed hp. Who cares about 10 hp...
This is only the beginning of power yet to be unleashed by this twinscrew!
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 08:31 AM
  #39  
Vman81's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-24-05
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Originally Posted by BoomInIt
Agreed... I don't think I would purchase this for no reason. More flow, cooler temps, more HP/tqlbs
It takes 2000hp to turn supercharger drag cars, but you don't see them complaining about robbed hp. Who cares about 10 hp...
This is only the beginning of power yet to be unleashed by this twinscrew!
well i wish everyone the best of luck with this setup and just so everyone knows, my name is Vince not bro.

whenever i win the lottery i'll be going turbo with my mods and we'll see who makes more power across the rpm band.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 10:25 AM
  #40  
BlueSS-supercharged's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-25-05
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
From: STL
aww snap
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 12:35 PM
  #41  
2K5SS/SC?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-08-05
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL
Originally Posted by Vman81
well i wish everyone the best of luck with this setup and just so everyone knows, my name is Vince not bro.

whenever i win the lottery i'll be going turbo with my mods and we'll see who makes more power across the rpm band.
Sorry if you took offense to me calling you bro. I'm from New Hampshire orginally and we use that as a friendly term. But if you prefer Vince, my name is Billy.

As far as the turbo argument goes, we all know an adequately sized turbo will outperform our twinscrew. I don't hate turbos considering my Integra in my sig has a nicely matched 16G on it and the entire kit was fabbed by myself. Plus, it hauls some serious a$$. To each his own though.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 02:36 PM
  #42  
Vman81's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-24-05
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Originally Posted by 2K5SS/SC?
Sorry if you took offense to me calling you bro. I'm from New Hampshire orginally and we use that as a friendly term. But if you prefer Vince, my name is Billy.

As far as the turbo argument goes, we all know an adequately sized turbo will outperform our twinscrew. I don't hate turbos considering my Integra in my sig has a nicely matched 16G on it and the entire kit was fabbed by myself. Plus, it hauls some serious a$$. To each his own though.
nice to meet you man and you are correct, to each his own
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 03:02 PM
  #43  
PuSha050's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-11-05
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
From: Yonkers NY
yo bro, i call every1 bro, impossible to know every1s name
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 03:04 PM
  #44  
quadracer0387's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-15-07
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
all i have to say is keep us posted on what happens cuz im savin for the screw and lookin to get one in the spring
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 01:03 PM
  #45  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
I'm definitely trying to get this before the end of the month. By any chance, does anyone know what psi they were pushing with it? and what injectors they were using?
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 02:14 PM
  #46  
UmeNNis's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-15-07
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 0
From: Woodbridge, VA
~20psi, 60lbers
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 02:27 PM
  #47  
Sales@rebelautoworxs's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-21-07
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: Rebel Land
Roughly 20psi depending on Exhaust setup and alitude.
We're using 60lb injectors on it.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 03:27 PM
  #48  
UmeNNis's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-15-07
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 0
From: Woodbridge, VA
beatcha to it rebel
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 05:26 PM
  #49  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
thanks a lot. and this kit doesn't come with the 60lbers right? also, the tune they used with hp tuners is extra? how much extra? sorry for the questions, it's just that my searching isn't coming up with these answers.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 07:24 PM
  #50  
UmeNNis's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-15-07
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 0
From: Woodbridge, VA
250$. Look here...https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/deleted-threads-89/twin-screw-1200ax-group-buy-68750/
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 AM.