this was on the redline forums.
lol 18% huh?
this is alphajaguar btw.

02-10-2007, 07:58 PM #15
AlphaJaguar5
Senior Member




Join Date: May 2005
Location: Weston, FL
Posts: 6,955 Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
Wait a minute...The dyno shows about 238 HP WTF

Pierre


Mustang dyno... They show REAL numbers but nobody that likes dyno numbers uses mustang dyno #'s so I converted them to Dynojet numbers which are 18% higher.



If this is true, then my dyno proven 269 whp on the mustang would really be 317 whp ??? wow... i need to change my sig. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

 

Ofcourse Alpha posted that.

 

he said hes 325 at the crank hahahahaha

 

 

the best part is mustang dyno do show lower, but like 8-10% not almost 20 lol...

and when i got my #'s they didnt believe them, but his math somehow speaks to the noobs on that site i guess?

 

 

maybe another reason that dynos shouldnt be used for anything but tuning anyways?

 

for once you and i agree stu

 

*******. u have meth right matty?

 

Matty has NO right to be raggin on ANYONE...Remember he is the one that Give the big cry baby story on the Redline Forums about how he need to sell the parts off his RL because he could not afford RENT. THen he took a bunch of guys money over there and NEVER SHIPPED THEM THE PARTS........

 

what are u serious cypress???? i remember reading that thread on redlineforums

 

took there money? where have you been, i refunded ever sent months ago noob. you must have a huge chip on your shoulder to bring that up now. there has been a few threads since where i made assbags like you look stupid by proving the refunds in full. Ill spare you, but grow up.

as for to sob story, there was like 5 people at the time in the same place... you really have no idea what your talking about, so stfu.

yes i have meth.

 

lol...RL comes over to the Shortbuss to rag on somone from the RLF

...classic...

...why didnt you start this thread over there, man?

 

Ever run in the 1/4?

Ill hold acceptance of ur numbers until u post trap speeds

 

i could, its not hard.. you just wouldnt have known it was me.

what makes you think i dont have an account lol

i got one run last year, at 3200 ft above sea level, 14.13 at 106mph with a 2.6 60' first and only run of the year. car wheel hopped like crazy and my clutch slipped through second, so i didnt even bother waiting through the ran delay to try again.

once it gets warm here and i get tires for summer ill run again.

 

No Chip on my shoulder. I could care less about you. I just think everyone should know what kind of a person you are.

 

^^^ good thing you dont know me, then youd look real stupid.

a refund is a refund, it was explained to mase, thats all that matters. ive sold parts since with no issues, so clearly your 100% wrong, and were all stupider for knowing you.

 

294whp and a 14.1 @ 106?

When I dynoed 239whp and 219 tq I ran a 14.0 @ 104 with a 2.2 60' street tires.

 

exactly, however, blown 4 banger ran a 14.1 and 107 .. goes both ways.

a 2.66 60' and a SLIPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPING clutch really hurt me.

dont believe me? watch my streetfire video, you can see the speed, and hear my clutch issues. or just ask jmac 88 who was with me.

i have the dyno graphs, and ill ask terry if he deleted the dyno video of both mine and james cars. it was on the same tape as the race so i hope he didnt.

 

both of you are stupidest for arguing on the internet! jk matty i like you

 

I dynoed 271whp and 254ftlb on a dynojet and went 14.0@109...WITHOUT meth...so on ur dyno i must have like 330whp...or something...

I had a 2.64 60' and a tranny that wouldnt shift as well

 

wow... did you not see where i had 1 RUN noob...my first ******* run EVER in the car.

stupid f**k, what was your first ever run? a 14.1? seriously doubt it, how about was your clutch slipping? nope, so looks like your car was .1 faster with a good clutch and .4 better 60', do the math idiot.

and secondly, jmac 88 had roughlyTHE EXACT SAME hp on the same dyno ON THE SAME DAY and has run in the 13's on stock tires so i guess your wrong again.

 

are we all comparing drag times?
i am stock+exh, 231 whp...14.5 @ 93 w/ a 1.7 60' & 14.443 @ 96 w/ a 2.1 60'

 

^ 1.7 60'? awd conversion? lol

your cool too

 

no, just really really low psi on 10" wide slicks + smm's...hence the low trap
i actually shattered a few teeth on my second gear from that run...