NEW SS S/C Stainless Exhaust! Dezod Style...
06-19-2006, 12:55 PM
#1
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-14-06
Location: Western NY
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NEW SS S/C Stainless Exhaust! Dezod Style...
Well guys we did it. We have a exhaust we designed for the Cobalt SS S/C 2.0L that will maximize supercharged FI flow, and not compromise too much low end TQ. The exhaust is made of full 304 Stainless Steel, and has a rather large resonator in it to make sure sounds levels are more crisp and not too loud. The piping diameter is 2.75", which is a great compromise of power and flow. 
We will have pictures shortly (hopefully later this week).
The exhaust will have a brief intro price with free shipping to the 48 states (Canada and AK & HI are extra). The regular price on this system will be in the $600-665 range plus shipping. The pre-order pricing will be $599 shipped for a little bit. So who wants in?
Stay tuned for the matching high flow cat too!!!
To pre-order click here
We will have pictures shortly (hopefully later this week).The exhaust will have a brief intro price with free shipping to the 48 states (Canada and AK & HI are extra). The regular price on this system will be in the $600-665 range plus shipping. The pre-order pricing will be $599 shipped for a little bit. So who wants in?
Stay tuned for the matching high flow cat too!!!
To pre-order click here
06-19-2006, 01:03 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-28-05
Location: Pope AFB, NC
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have an idea for you Dezod, as well as saying thanks! for all the updates and price options, and new products you guys are pushing...How about a Block to tip exhaust system! Or I have another idea, an exhaust a la carte section...you choose from drop down menus which header, combined with another menu for which DP, then another with which catback system you want...just throwing some ideas out there, and this goes for all vendors as well...then a price calculator will add upi your total at the end, I want a FULL exhaust, but know that I don't want 3". 2.50 is how I want to go from the header, all the way back...thanks again for the updates...
06-19-2006, 09:04 PM
#6
Member
Join Date: 06-18-06
Location: Oak Ridge, NJ
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
but why so expensive...i don't get it, i have purchased a good 5-6 different cat-backs for various vehicles and have never had to spend more then 500 bucks...and that was on a borla system...all stainless, most 2.5"
06-19-2006, 09:26 PM
#7
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-14-06
Location: Western NY
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Toyotech
but why so expensive...i don't get it, i have purchased a good 5-6 different cat-backs for various vehicles and have never had to spend more then 500 bucks...and that was on a borla system...all stainless, most 2.5"
06-19-2006, 09:29 PM
#8
Member
Join Date: 06-18-06
Location: Oak Ridge, NJ
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if you say so. ya say 500+ shipping and i'd be happy. i've purchased from ya guys before for my random tech's...easy to deal with. thats something i will certainly pay for. i love my random tech's 
06-19-2006, 09:32 PM
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-26-06
Location: Arizona
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dezod
R&D AND stainless is expensive. Not to mention 304 at that, not 409 like a lot of companies. Also, larger diameter piping is always more expensive as well.
06-19-2006, 09:34 PM
#13
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-14-06
Location: Western NY
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blown 4-banger
Yeah and 2.75" is an odd size, mostly its 2.5" or 3"
06-19-2006, 09:36 PM
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-26-06
Location: Arizona
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dezod
Point and case. No competition and a great compromise between 2.5 and 3"
06-19-2006, 09:59 PM
#17
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-14-06
Location: Western NY
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by srt-killer
There might be no competition in that size but what matters to us is perfromance gain. Is there any real benifit in going 2.75 over 2.5 or 3".
Smaller diameter piping = more low-end TQ and sacrifice of top end HP
Larger diameter piping = more top-end HP and sacrifice of low-end TQ
Middle ground of 2.75" is the best of both worlds honestly.
06-19-2006, 10:18 PM
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-26-06
Location: Arizona
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dezod
In the world of forced induction it goes as follows:
Smaller diameter piping = more low-end TQ and sacrifice of top end HP
Larger diameter piping = more top-end HP and sacrifice of low-end TQ
Middle ground of 2.75" is the best of both worlds honestly.
Smaller diameter piping = more low-end TQ and sacrifice of top end HP
Larger diameter piping = more top-end HP and sacrifice of low-end TQ
Middle ground of 2.75" is the best of both worlds honestly.
