2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

questions about 3" catback

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 12:52 PM
  #1  
DSMissed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-31-06
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
From: Wyoming
questions about 3" catback

I have a 3" downpipe and I wanted to get 3" catback. The exhaust shops here are giving me a hard time about it.

First off, they are saying that 3" won't even fit under the car.

Secondly, they are saying that 3" would be overkill for my car, that I would actually lose hp with it. (funny cause it was a huge gain for my talon)

Third, they are saying that to bend the 3" pipes the way they need to be they will put horrendous kinks in the pipe, which will make the 3" piping pointless anyways.

Lastly...I'd like to get a resonator, but they are telling me that my ground clearance will be too badly affected for a resonator, cause the resonator will be around 4 1/2" in diameter.



So, BS or not BS? Is 2.5" or 3" better? Is there a 3" kit available? Resonator...yay or nay?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 12:58 PM
  #2  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Secondly, they are saying that 3" would be overkill for my car, that I would actually lose hp with it. (funny cause it was a huge gain for my talon)
They are 100% right.

The reason you gained power on a turbocharged car is because post-turbocharger, you're not following the same laws of exhaust velocity and scavenging like you would a naturally aspirated vehicle or a supercharged vehicle. The optimal exhaust system for a turbocharged car would be as wide as possible and as short as possible (open downpipe), this is for optimal power.

The smaller the exhaust system on a turbocharged car, the more backpressure is being created and the pressure going back towards the engine causes slight disruptions with the turbine trying to spin as free as possible in a single direction slowing down response time.

If you put a 3" exhaust system on, you'd cause a slower exhaust velocity build up and slower scavenging effects at lower RPMs. You MIGHT make more peak HP but your power band would narrow out (or become peaky).

As far as fitting, if they knew what they were doing, they could make a 3" exhaust fit.

Adding a resonator would keep the tone down alot. I've heard a 3" on a ss/sc and it's louder than a fat guy screaming as he's falling off the empire state building.

The longer the resonator, the deeper and quieter the tone. Otherwise, you'd sound...well...obnoxious.

Last edited by NJHK; Aug 16, 2007 at 12:58 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 01:04 PM
  #3  
DSMissed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-31-06
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
From: Wyoming
Hmm. Ok well that all makes sense.

I guess one more question, lol. I already bought a Magnaflow muffler thats 3" in and out. Will it be stupid to have that flanged onto 2.5" pipe?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 01:05 PM
  #4  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
They can do it, it's not that big of a difference. It won't hurt anything either.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 03:31 PM
  #5  
BlurpleSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-16-07
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
at what HP is a 3" necessary for the Cobalt?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 03:34 PM
  #6  
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-11-07
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
From: Az
He has Stage 2 and if i was him i would be going with a 3" catback.

Originally Posted by BlurpleSS
at what HP is a 3" necessary for the Cobalt?
As soon as you drop on a smaller pulley.

There's a huge thread about at what hp you need a 3" exhaust. I think it was at 300crank horsepower which is 268whp.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 03:37 PM
  #7  
Jackalope's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 1
From: here
Its been shown mathmaticly that once you hit the 300hp mark is where the 3" piping comes into play. Below 300 your killing your low end and losing HP over a 2.5.

Its been shown on here a bunch of times. Adam sumed it up for you.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 03:38 PM
  #8  
BlurpleSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-16-07
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
TY guys.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 03:39 PM
  #9  
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-11-07
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
From: Az
Originally Posted by Jackalope
Its been shown mathmaticly that once you hit the 300hp mark is where the 3" piping comes into play. Below 300 your killing your low end and losing HP over a 2.5.

Its been shown on here a bunch of times. Adam sumed it up for you.
You're not going to lose horsepower with a 3". You'll lose low end torque but will make it up as top end horsepower.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 03:39 PM
  #10  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
i can put my car on a lift take pics, and prove that 3 inch fits. of course. im not exactly stage 2 anymore. with the type of racing i do, it is needed
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 03:42 PM
  #11  
Rangerondubz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-20-06
Posts: 5,450
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
I have 3" and I love it!
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 03:46 PM
  #12  
p7x's Avatar
p7x
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-15-05
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
unfortunately you made the same mistake I did by buying the 3" DP first. While the debate between 2.5" vs 3.0" will rage on I think my 3" exhaust is great but u will lose some low end but gain some high end.

IMO you want a 2.5 Dp and 3" or 2.5" exhaust, because after the DP it doesnt matter what size ur exhaust is as long as its 2.5"+. Just my 2 cents.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 04:01 PM
  #13  
BlackSS182's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-20-07
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Dallas tx
hey vibrant makes a 3" catback system for the cobalt, and dont listen to people who say you will loose low end power thats bs they have this weird thing about back presure there just dumb, if they where right it would mean a small exhaust would be the best lol so go with the 3 thats wat im getting
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 04:18 PM
  #14  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by BlackSS182
hey vibrant makes a 3" catback system for the cobalt, and dont listen to people who say you will loose low end power thats bs they have this weird thing about back presure there just dumb, if they where right it would mean a small exhaust would be the best lol so go with the 3 thats wat im getting
Do you understand what exhaust velocity or what intake / exhaust resonating is?

I love how you say that people are dumb for saying that about 3" exhaust systems when you don't even have one and the testimony from people who have a 3" exhaust say exactly the opposite.

Bigger isn't always better. Yes, sometimes a smaller exhaust system is best for a wider powerband.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 04:21 PM
  #15  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Originally Posted by NJHK
Do you understand what exhaust velocity or what intake / exhaust resonating is?

I love how you say that people are dumb for saying that about 3" exhaust systems when you don't even have one and the testimony from people who have a 3" exhaust say exactly the opposite.

Bigger isn't always better. Yes, sometimes a smaller exhaust system is best for a wider powerband.
im sorry trebek, can you rephrase the question in the form of a cheeseburger?


in short. no.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 04:22 PM
  #16  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by Area47
im sorry trebek, can you rephrase the question in the form of a cheeseburger?


in short. no.
"I'll take the rapist for 400"
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 04:27 PM
  #17  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Originally Posted by NJHK
"I'll take the rapist for 400"
i've got it.

team thread jack. "we will **** up any thread"
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 04:34 PM
  #18  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Rofl
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 05:00 PM
  #19  
BlurpleSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-16-07
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
I'll take "the ***** mightier!"
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 05:03 PM
  #20  
aj_92rs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-06
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Earth
3" would be fine.

The physics of the exhaust on a naturally aspirated engine and a force induction engine are completely different.

The whole concept of scavenging from a smaller exhaust with higher velocity is to scavenge the cylinders during valve overlap.

A good forced induction engine shouldn't have any overlap, or at the least a very, very small amount. Scavenging the cylinder isn't practical in a force induction engine.

Is 3" necessary? Probably not, but the same adverse effects of an exhaust which is too large on a naturally aspirated engine won't apply.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 05:10 PM
  #21  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by aj_92rs
3" would be fine.

The physics of the exhaust on a naturally aspirated engine and a force induction engine are completely different.

The whole concept of scavenging from a smaller exhaust with higher velocity is to scavenge the cylinders during valve overlap.

A good forced induction engine shouldn't have any overlap, or at the least a very, very small amount. Scavenging the cylinder isn't practical in a force induction engine.

Is 3" necessary? Probably not, but the same adverse effects of an exhaust which is too large on a naturally aspirated engine won't apply.
But they still have overlap none the less.

The most important part is understanding exhaust velocity.

But I agree with what you're saying though.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 05:40 PM
  #22  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
for the few of us that are pushing over 270 to the tire. we benefit from it. the others. don't.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 05:45 PM
  #23  
aj_92rs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-06
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Originally Posted by NJHK
But they still have overlap none the less.

The most important part is understanding exhaust velocity.

But I agree with what you're saying though.
Yes. Understanding exhaust velocity and pulse waves is what it's all about.

As far as turbo engines go, that's your game. I'm not very familiar with turbo engines and how exhaust velocity and pulse waves play into those. I'm not that educated on the effects of those things on the turbine.

I would assume velocity is very important but pulse waves not so much. The pulse waves won't reach the exhaust valve in the same manner as a naturally aspirate, or even a supercharged engine so all pulse waves (I'm assuming) would be lost regardless (or for lack of a better term "scattered").
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 05:51 PM
  #24  
black06ss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-29-05
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, Florida
im running 2.5 dp with the clear image header and the hahn catack, i agree that the low end is a little weaker but luckily my 2.5 stuff makes up for most of that. and it will fit quite easily.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 05:54 PM
  #25  
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-11-07
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
From: Az
Originally Posted by p7x
unfortunately you made the same mistake I did by buying the 3" DP first. While the debate between 2.5" vs 3.0" will rage on I think my 3" exhaust is great but u will lose some low end but gain some high end.

IMO you want a 2.5 Dp and 3" or 2.5" exhaust, because after the DP it doesnt matter what size ur exhaust is as long as its 2.5"+. Just my 2 cents.
Why would you run a 3" exhaust after a 2.5" downpipe? Biggest waste in the world.

Ideal setup for S2 cars would be....

1 7/8th Header
3" downpipe
3" catback
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 AM.