2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Stage 2 Dyno vs Stock... Before and After

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 24, 2006 | 08:44 PM
  #26  
zer0's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-22-06
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: York PA
Originally Posted by βКˉSuPerCharged
How much does it cost to have a car dyno'd? There is one around here somewhere but I was wondering what some of you have paid for the test.
$50 is a normal going rate for 3 power pulls. At least in my area.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2006 | 02:24 AM
  #27  
InfinityzeN's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 0
From: Harker Heights, TX
Dude, their dyno is rating low, but those are some sweet numbers. Man, I wish mine put down that.





J/K girl, you know your siggy makes it hard to resist.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2006 | 02:45 AM
  #28  
NGalaxyTimmyo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-31-05
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 1
From: Dearborn Hts, MI
Blah, so what if one dyno says 220 and one says 240. Your doing the right thing by going back to the same shop and seeing what your mods are doing. There's too many different types of dynos, and none will give the same numbers as the other. Sure, I might go to shop a knowing that they have numbers on the high side to brag about it, but once I'm at that track the only numbers that are gonna mean anything are those one on the slip.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2006 | 08:50 AM
  #29  
bamfnss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-26-06
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: York, PA
That is the exact reason I went back to the same shop. You can tell exacty what stage 2 gives you, 18.87whp & 23.21wtq. All under warrenty!!! Im happy...for now..lol

Last edited by bamfnss; Dec 25, 2006 at 09:24 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2006 | 09:26 AM
  #30  
shadowfaxss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-14-06
Posts: 1,646
Likes: 1
From: PA
Geat numbers....I'm anxious for the stage II kit myself. The car is fun to drive now.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2006 | 12:46 PM
  #31  
Rodimus_Prime's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
hmm and i was off yesterday too, wasnt around to go though, i do want to visit a dynojet after the first oil change though
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 12:45 AM
  #32  
05redline's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-23-06
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
Only 18 whp? You should have put down more than that.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 08:31 AM
  #33  
bamfnss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-26-06
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: York, PA
Originally Posted by 05redline
Only 18 whp? You should have put down more than that.
What are you comparing that to? If you look around these #'s are normal gains. Your only switching to a slightly smaller pulley that ups the boost to 15psi, injectors, and a conservative GM tune. All warrantied power.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 12:01 PM
  #34  
InfinityzeN's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 0
From: Harker Heights, TX
Actually, I wouldn't say it gives you 19whp and 23wtq. I'd say it gives you about +8.9% whp and 12.4% wtq, which is actually about what it should give you if you put down 220whp and 195wtq stoke.

Though your torque curve is not as flat, your power band starts earlier. This with the increased redline should help with shift stalling a great deal.

Another point you can see is that your torque curve drops alot at the high end of the scale. This lets you know that ether your running out of cam or your exhaust is not flowing enough to let you keep your torque high, compared to how it flowed with the stock pulley. I'd guess it is cam, so it might be time for a header and downpipe, or even a full 2.5" straight pipe exhaust. I'd say you really want to improved your exhaust flow before getting some cams.

Something else that might be hurting your high end is higher IAT2 temps from the faster spilling SC causing some timing to be pulled at the higher end. You might want to consider adding something to help with this or scan the temps.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 06:33 PM
  #35  
bamfnss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-26-06
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: York, PA
Originally Posted by Jim@Tagracecraft
great gains, those numbers look very close to what we get on our dynojet. Usually with GM stage2 to we get around 230WHP and 215TQ, so from our experience with the Cobalt/Redlines I would say those numbers are correct.

As for the intake and exhaust, you will see better gains as you add a smaller pulley. On our TAG Stage 2 we saw about 4lb/min increase on the maf which equates to about 35WHP (clutch was slipping so couldn't really get a dyno number on the increase).

When you install our water/meth kit and our tune you should pick up another 20-25HP and 30TQ, specially down low around 3500rpm where the TQ really matters. I also recommend our 2.79" pulley if you are getting our tune, as we can throw the tune for the pulley in too.
Ill be definatly going with you guys. Just need to get some more $$. Also can I accomplish the 2.79 pulley with the 42lb Injectors and Meth Injection?
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #36  
bamfnss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-26-06
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: York, PA
Originally Posted by InfinityzeN
Actually, I wouldn't say it gives you 19whp and 23wtq. I'd say it gives you about +8.9% whp and 12.4% wtq, which is actually about what it should give you if you put down 220whp and 195wtq stoke.

Though your torque curve is not as flat, your power band starts earlier. This with the increased redline should help with shift stalling a great deal.

Another point you can see is that your torque curve drops alot at the high end of the scale. This lets you know that ether your running out of cam or your exhaust is not flowing enough to let you keep your torque high, compared to how it flowed with the stock pulley. I'd guess it is cam, so it might be time for a header and downpipe, or even a full 2.5" straight pipe exhaust. I'd say you really want to improved your exhaust flow before getting some cams.

Something else that might be hurting your high end is higher IAT2 temps from the faster spilling SC causing some timing to be pulled at the higher end. You might want to consider adding something to help with this or scan the temps.
I forgot to add I have a 2.5" Catless DP.. also I did try running a side exit exhaust and it showed next to nothing. I need a custom tune and some cams...injectors etc.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 07:04 PM
  #37  
Rodimus_Prime's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
2.8 pulley on 42lbers is not a real great idea, even with water/meth thats dangerously close on injector duty cycle, theres been a number of posts reguarding that.

If by some chance you did manage to stay under 80% duty cycle pretty much any future moddding is going to push the injectors beyond what they can handle theres not much room for improvement, going to 60lbers would be your best bet if your going to go smaller than 2.9 on the pulley
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 10:23 PM
  #38  
bamfnss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-26-06
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: York, PA
Originally Posted by Rodimus_Prime
2.8 pulley on 42lbers is not a real great idea, even with water/meth thats dangerously close on injector duty cycle, theres been a number of posts reguarding that.

If by some chance you did manage to stay under 80% duty cycle pretty much any future moddding is going to push the injectors beyond what they can handle theres not much room for improvement, going to 60lbers would be your best bet if your going to go smaller than 2.9 on the pulley
Yea, I have my eye on some 60s just need to figure out if any of the group buys I'm in actually go through...
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2006 | 09:32 AM
  #39  
InfinityzeN's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 0
From: Harker Heights, TX
Ok, so 2.5" catless downpipe and catback. What about your header? Still stock or did you swap it out, because if that was stock it would cause a big restriction on your exhaust at the higher rpms.

Other than that though, I agree with you that some cams might be a good idea. I would sugest the JBP triflow ones, since they appear to help across the board instead of just pushing your power band higher up the rpm range. While you got the head off to change the cams, might as well get that sucker ported/polished and maybe change some of the drivetrain. At the least the springs, but you wanna make sure that the whole drivetrain can handle the lift of the cams. I think shooting for 0.5" is perfect since that seems to be the hight of most of the aftermarket cams.

So lets see...
Higher flowing header (if not already changed)
60# Injectors
2.7~2.9" pulley (base on target redline and cooling system)
Cooling as needed (2 pass heat extractor, larger heat exhanger, overflow can, water injection)
Monitering, cuz without it you'll blow something up
Cams (I like JBP TriFlow, but there are other choices)
Valve & Springs (to handle the cams)
Head port and polish (local or buy one, local is cheaper but make sure its a good shop)
Tune tune tune, cuz this sucka will run like shizt or not at all till you do.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2006 | 10:07 AM
  #40  
DTM2188's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-23-06
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
From: S. Jersey
Originally Posted by bamfnss
Dyno was done at www.aptuning.com
They are mainly a VW/Audi shop, but hopefully I can convince them to tune some Cobalts..
Didn't realize it until now, but a friend of mine got his VW tuned or dynoed there.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2006 | 02:33 PM
  #41  
mattyfinch's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-09-06
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: New Glasgow N.S.
Originally Posted by Rodimus_Prime
2.8 pulley on 42lbers is not a real great idea, even with water/meth thats dangerously close on injector duty cycle, theres been a number of posts reguarding that.

If by some chance you did manage to stay under 80% duty cycle pretty much any future moddding is going to push the injectors beyond what they can handle theres not much room for improvement, going to 60lbers would be your best bet if your going to go smaller than 2.9 on the pulley

As she stands now, the 2.8 and 42.5lbs injectors would work handsomely together. When adding the methanol, you actually REMOVE fuel from the hide end to allow for the methanol mixture to be incorporated. The cam's and tune would be where she would pick up significant gains, making the 60 lb injectors more required.

Im not saying dont go with the 60's they are worth it, but with the meth, at 290 whp, i was only at 74% duty on the 60's. There are guys on the rl.forums, and such running 42's and seeing 260 whp and higher without comprimising the set-up or injectors.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2006 | 06:54 PM
  #42  
Mase's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 02-06-06
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, ON, CA
Originally Posted by mattyfinch
As she stands now, the 2.8 and 42.5lbs injectors would work handsomely together. When adding the methanol, you actually REMOVE fuel from the hide end to allow for the methanol mixture to be incorporated. The cam's and tune would be where she would pick up significant gains, making the 60 lb injectors more required.

Im not saying dont go with the 60's they are worth it, but with the meth, at 290 whp, i was only at 74% duty on the 60's. There are guys on the rl.forums, and such running 42's and seeing 260 whp and higher without comprimising the set-up or injectors.
Mattyfinch I really don't understand why your still posting on here, haven't you ripped off enough people. I wonder when my credit card company is gonna come after you

now to your stupidity, first off 2.8 and 42lb injectors don't go together "handsomely" even if you got meth spray or in your case 80% meth spraying If you want to post some log files as proof, I'll post mine....oh wait you don't have HPT, you got your car tuned by someone else and now you think you know something.

you still post on the RL forum too, man you got some *****
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
HEATON
Parts
12
Oct 16, 2015 07:21 PM
maliki778
Dyno Results
4
Oct 1, 2015 07:39 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM
grampss
Complete Cars
0
Sep 27, 2015 08:51 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 PM.