2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Twinscrew Current Dyno Numbers & Issues

Old Aug 19, 2007 | 11:59 AM
  #51  
Red2.4SS/SC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-21-06
Posts: 3,796
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by Eng@RebelAutoWorxs
we made 280whp and 270wtq on a dynojet at 5700rpm on a stock cobalt running the Twin Screw. We claimed with an exhaust it should make 300whp at 7000rpm. I think we can say we have proven this.
The reason 2K5SS/SC? has to tweak his tune is because he's nothing close to stock before slapping on the kit.

Great job so far it's always a battle with the things you never think of.
i would definately not say you have acheived anything , all you guys have acheived was almost hydrolocking the motor , ive seen cobalts dyno higher with the M62 , not knocking your project just not impressed

2500$ to dyno MAYBE 20-30 more WHP isnt exactly worth it IMO
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 12:02 PM
  #52  
KillerBee's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-23-07
Posts: 14,118
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
Excuses, Excuses, Excuses. This post just proves that the kit is not a direct bolt-in. So on top of the 3K dollar asking price you'll need to spend 300-400 dollars to have it tuned.

Even more if you need someone to install it for you. What a waste

I told you guys he would be coming
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 12:03 PM
  #53  
Red2.4SS/SC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-21-06
Posts: 3,796
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
Excuses, Excuses, Excuses. This post just proves that the kit is not a direct bolt-in. So on top of the 3K dollar asking price you'll need to spend 300-400 dollars to have it tuned.

Even more if you need someone to install it for you. What a waste

i agree , ok im joe blow and i just dynoed 290 WHP with meth and the M62 and a great tune , can someone in here justify to me spending 2500 to dyno 320 maybe 330 ??? thats like a 100 dollars per HP AKA a waste of money

all im saying is if i still owned a cobalt and was running 290 WHP on the M62 i wouldnt even look in this swaps direction
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #54  
Element2.4's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 08-02-07
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
From: CaLiFoRnIa BiShEs!
MattyFinch dynoed 296 WHP with a 2.5 and meth. I think the tq was around 280 if I remeber correctly.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 12:15 PM
  #55  
Red2.4SS/SC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-21-06
Posts: 3,796
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by Element2.4
MattyFinch dynoed 296 WHP with a 2.5 and meth. I think the tq was around 280 if I remeber correctly.
therefore why would matty finch pay 3000$ to dyno maybe 325 complete waste , just port the head and run some aggresive cams and it will be cheaper and more reliable , or a turbo
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 12:17 PM
  #56  
WSFrazier's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-05
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
A few others have been trying to say, if you look at the charts, this thing isn't that more efficient to the Eaton, same problems.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 12:18 PM
  #57  
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-11-07
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
From: Az
Originally Posted by CobaltSS313
Wow it took you longer than I expected to respond. I thought you'd have 15 posts in this thread by now.


People always seem to think i post just to make fun of something. Let's get something straight. IMO going to a TS is a great step. My only problem with the kit is that they went with too small of a blower and the price is about a grand too high. I hope you hit 300whp with it when it's all done BUT i would have liked to see what kind of power it would put down without the need for any extra's.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 12:24 PM
  #58  
Sales@rebelautoworxs's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-21-07
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: Rebel Land
Originally Posted by Element2.4
MattyFinch dynoed 296 WHP with a 2.5 and meth. I think the tq was around 280 if I remeber correctly.
That guy never Produced a Dyno Graph ever.. Total BS.
I've seen a stage 2 car Put down 273hp on a mustang dyno. Dyno's are tools for tuning plan and simple.
If you wanna go dyno racing there are ways to fudge the numbers.We DO NOT!
I've Personally dyno'd over 40 cobalts on the dyno and 100's of other cars that weren't cobalts. I've seen that same car go to another dyno and make 15-20% more or less.


We would have finished the tuning on the twin screw ourselves, but do not have a car with a clutch in it to take the power it is making. The stock clutch is not up to the power this kit is making thus we sent out the first kit to 2K5SS/SC?
The Kit is a direct bolt on you Unbolt and re-bolt. The tune is still being developed, you have to understand that the twin screw is nothing like the M62 interms of tuning.
We ask that everyone be patient with us and 2K5SS/SC?. He is busting his ass to get things tuned up right.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 12:28 PM
  #59  
Red2.4SS/SC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-21-06
Posts: 3,796
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by Sales@rebelautoworxs
That guy never Produced a Dyno Graph ever.. Total BS.
I've seen a stage 2 car Put down 273hp on a mustang dyno. Dyno's are tools for tuning plan and simple.
If you wanna go dyno racing there are ways to fudge the numbers.We DO NOT!
I've Personally dyno'd over 40 cobalts on the dyno and 100's of other cars that weren't cobalts. I've seen that same car go to another dyno and make 15-20% more or less.


We would have finished the tuning on the twin screw ourselves, but do not have a car with a clutch in it to take the power it is making. The stock clutch is not up to the power this kit is making thus we sent out the first kit to 2K5SS/SC?
The Kit is a direct bolt on you Unbolt and re-bolt. The tune is still being developed, you have to understand that the twin screw is nothing like the M62 interms of tuning.
We ask that everyone be patient with us and 2K5SS/SC?. He is busting his ass to get things tuned up right.
alright ill come back in september good luck
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 12:29 PM
  #60  
Sales@rebelautoworxs's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-21-07
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: Rebel Land
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
People always seem to think i post just to make fun of something. Let's get something straight. IMO going to a TS is a great step. My only problem with the kit is that they went with too small of a blower and the price is about a grand too high. I hope you hit 300whp with it when it's all done BUT i would have liked to see what kind of power it would put down without the need for any extra's.
You have no Idea how many parts actually go into this kit. There is quite a bit of machine work invloved as well as welding and assembly time.
Parts add up. Not to mention the blower isn't cheap and comes from sweden.
Last time I checked my kids wanted to eat and live in a house.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 12:38 PM
  #61  
zinner's Avatar
Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: 08-26-04
Posts: 4,944
Likes: 2
From: RTP, NC
Can you go to a dyno jet and dyno? Dynojet numbers mean more to everyone. For the most part 80% of the people on this site have dyno'd with a dynojet...
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 12:40 PM
  #62  
SUKXOST's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-06
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
lol preach on brother! good sh*t.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 12:40 PM
  #63  
WSFrazier's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-05
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Or take it to the track?
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 12:41 PM
  #64  
braineater's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 04-13-07
Posts: 11,127
Likes: 0
From: Detroit
Originally Posted by Sales@rebelautoworxs
You have no Idea how many parts actually go into this kit. There is quite a bit of machine work invloved as well as welding and assembly time.
Parts add up. Not to mention the blower isn't cheap and comes from sweden.
Last time I checked my kids wanted to eat and live in a house.
does that mean we can blame your kids if we cant afford it


just kidding, couldnt resist!
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 12:54 PM
  #65  
Jmc007's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-22-05
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
From: Quebec City, Quebec
Originally Posted by Red2.4SS/SC
i would definately not say you have acheived anything , all you guys have acheived was almost hydrolocking the motor , ive seen cobalts dyno higher with the M62 , not knocking your project just not impressed

2500$ to dyno MAYBE 20-30 more WHP isnt exactly worth it IMO

Please show us some M62's Cobalt dynoed more than 272 WHP on a MUSTANG dyno. Where are the graphs ???

Secondly, to evaluate properly the amount of power it gives over the M62 with an IDENTICAL setup, you must compare numbers coming from the same dyno. This has been said tons of time.

Finally, your post was so unrealistic and pessimist, that if I would be a moderator, I would at least delete your post or at worst banned you.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 01:04 PM
  #66  
Element2.4's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 08-02-07
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
From: CaLiFoRnIa BiShEs!
Originally Posted by Jmc007
Please show us some M62's Cobalt dynoed more than 272 WHP on a MUSTANG dyno. Where are the graphs ???

Secondly, to evaluate properly the amount of power it gives over the M62 with an IDENTICAL setup, you must compare numbers coming from the same dyno. This has been said tons of time.

Finally, your post was so unrealistic and pessimist, that if I would be a moderator, I would at least delete your post or at worst banned you.
Thats why your not a mod.

Originally Posted by Sales@rebelautoworxs
You have no Idea how many parts actually go into this kit. There is quite a bit of machine work invloved as well as welding and assembly time.
Parts add up. Not to mention the blower isn't cheap and comes from sweden.
Last time I checked my kids wanted to eat and live in a house.
3k Bucks isnt to bad but you should consider including the tune with the cost. The tune isnt going to cost you anymore to distribute to people.

Last edited by Element2.4; Aug 19, 2007 at 01:04 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 01:18 PM
  #67  
zinner's Avatar
Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: 08-26-04
Posts: 4,944
Likes: 2
From: RTP, NC
stop arguing with each other.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 01:20 PM
  #68  
Sales@rebelautoworxs's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-21-07
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: Rebel Land
Element2.4 Buy a Kit I'll give you a free tune file.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 01:22 PM
  #69  
Red2.4SS/SC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-21-06
Posts: 3,796
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by Sales@rebelautoworxs
Element2.4 Buy a Kit I'll give you a free tune file.
do it
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 01:28 PM
  #70  
Doc's Avatar
Doc
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-11-05
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside, Ca
This does fit into the simple bolt-on category that the srt-4 guys brag about
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 01:30 PM
  #71  
Darksun's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-04-05
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
From: LongIsland
i will admit 272 whp on a mustang dyno nice but still.......

We really won't know untill he gets everything sorted out. personally i wouldn' have post anything to anyone on this site till i had it close to 90 or 100% because he should have known that his post would have come under scurtiny........
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 01:30 PM
  #72  
stryder's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-14-06
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by Sales@rebelautoworxs
That guy never Produced a Dyno Graph ever.. Total BS.
I've seen a stage 2 car Put down 273hp on a mustang dyno. Dyno's are tools for tuning plan and simple.
If you wanna go dyno racing there are ways to fudge the numbers.We DO NOT!
I've Personally dyno'd over 40 cobalts on the dyno and 100's of other cars that weren't cobalts. I've seen that same car go to another dyno and make 15-20% more or less.


We would have finished the tuning on the twin screw ourselves, but do not have a car with a clutch in it to take the power it is making. The stock clutch is not up to the power this kit is making thus we sent out the first kit to 2K5SS/SC?
The Kit is a direct bolt on you Unbolt and re-bolt. The tune is still being developed, you have to understand that the twin screw is nothing like the M62 interms of tuning.
We ask that everyone be patient with us and 2K5SS/SC?. He is busting his ass to get things tuned up right.

I totally agree, I think you guys have made a great great idea into a great product. The issue is the tuning and as we all know tuning is a bitch for the balts. I will wait patiently to see what beast of a tune you can get from this set up.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 01:30 PM
  #73  
WSFrazier's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-05
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
And about the false knock problem. Clutch and blower noise isn't going to give you false knock readings. Those don't come close to make the frequencies the knock sensor picks up.

An LSJ with a solid metal to metal mount doesn't even give false knock readings.

Last edited by WSFrazier; Aug 19, 2007 at 01:58 PM.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 01:31 PM
  #74  
Darksun's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-04-05
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
From: LongIsland
Originally Posted by Doc
This does fit into the simple bolt-on category that the srt-4 guys brag about
man i've raced full bolt on stock turbo ones who complain about "Not really even having anymods"..................
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 01:45 PM
  #75  
06blackg85ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-06
Posts: 15,211
Likes: 20
From: New York
yeah those bastards lol.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:33 PM.