2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.
View Poll Results: Wouldn't This Be A Better GM Stage 3?
Yes!
60.27%
No!
10.96%
I like the "current" GM Stage 3!
5.48%
I would rather make my own!
23.29%
Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll

Wouldn't This Be A Better GM Stage 3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 04:37 PM
  #1  
CTCOBALTSSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-21-06
Posts: 7,917
Likes: 2
From: CT
Wouldn't This Be A Better GM Stage 3?

OK, so lots of people are not liking the nitrous. I agree. Wouldn't this be better and easier?

1. 2.8" pulley
2. Bigger fuel injectors (60lb.)
3. GM extruded honed manifold w/ GM cat-back exhaust
4. Reflash

They already have everything except the 2.8" pulleys but that's easy.
What do you guys think?

Last edited by CTCOBALTSSS; Jul 26, 2006 at 08:35 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 04:50 PM
  #2  
Satchmo's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 06-29-06
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: STL, MO
I voted YES, as long as it would still be under warranty. Otherwise, I would just go INTENSE and be done with it, which I might still do once that warranty runs out.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 04:57 PM
  #3  
JCswoosher2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-10-05
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 0
From: Douglasville, Georgia
i agree. the nitrous thing isnt cool to me. im still wanting to know what gives the Time Attack car 283 before nitrous. i thought the stage 3 was a shot of nitrous added tot he 245 for stage 2
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 05:05 PM
  #4  
Pyros777's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 01-26-05
Posts: 3,418
Likes: 1
From: N/A
Originally Posted by JCswoosher2
i agree. the nitrous thing isnt cool to me. im still wanting to know what gives the Time Attack car 283 before nitrous. i thought the stage 3 was a shot of nitrous added tot he 245 for stage 2
^ Exactly my thoughts. The things that GM lists for Stage 3 besides the nitrous would not add up to 283, unless thats a crank hp number..
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 06:16 PM
  #5  
joeytroy's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-23-06
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Belen, NM
I don't understand why GM would even think of using NOS on their engine? I mean maybe their staff is watching Fast & the Furious and think thats what GM peps want? Personally I am sure there are better methods to the maddness, like twin charged or something of the sort.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 06:30 PM
  #6  
p7x's Avatar
p7x
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-15-05
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
that setup was intially rumoured to be GM stage 3

BTW I voted yes
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 07:02 PM
  #7  
Stax810's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-25-06
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
i agree on no nitrous.... idk about that hp number either... personally... i think nitrous in any fashion is foolish and way overpriced.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 07:02 PM
  #8  
05BlackCobaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-24-05
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
From: Southern Illinois
id be MUCH MUCH happier with that rather than a package that uses the laughing gas and will make thw cabin 100 degrees plus in the summer.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 07:10 PM
  #9  
victory_red_SS's Avatar
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
I voted for making my own as most of you know I have done. I have ordered custom badges calling this "Roddy's Stage 5.5" which is part inside joke and my favorite number - 5.

Originally Posted by 05BlackCobaltSS
id be MUCH MUCH happier with that rather than a package that uses the laughing gas and will make thw cabin 100 degrees plus in the summer.
You have to consider that the disabling the A\C works if this is used as GM intended, off road only, meaning race tracks not 4x4'ing.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 07:30 PM
  #10  
Vette Jr.'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-20-06
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
From: New York
All those parts can be perchased already, and the extrude honed header is worthless, Unless there was a major discount on the kit then I would rather make my own set up with a better exhaust system
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 07:36 PM
  #11  
OniMirage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-14-05
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
From: Phx, AZ
I say make my own but I want that bigger better heat exchanger if it does come with one hope i can part it out
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 08:07 PM
  #12  
zinner's Avatar
Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: 08-26-04
Posts: 4,944
Likes: 2
From: RTP, NC
Originally Posted by CTCOBALTSSS
OK, so lots of people are not liking the nitrous. I agree. Wouldn't this be better and easier?

1. 2.8" pulley
2. Bigger fuel injectors
3. GM extruded honed manifold w/ GM cat-back exhaust
4. Reflash

They already have everything except the 2.8" pulleys but that's easy.
What do you guys think?

Sorry but thats not anything close to a real stage 3.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:02 PM
  #13  
DarthMaul's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-16-05
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Canada

Twin charge TURBO...
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:25 PM
  #14  
Asphalt Assault's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-14-06
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 1
From: soon to banned as I am from MANITOBA?
Originally Posted by zinner
Sorry but thats not anything close to a real stage 3.
come on Zinner explain yourself.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:28 PM
  #15  
Asphalt Assault's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-14-06
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 1
From: soon to banned as I am from MANITOBA?
Well I would need to see pricing etc. but given a choice between the two I would go with your plan. Bottles are for babies LOL. no really I think you should modify still you are spent then put on a bottle. IMO. I voted to go on my on to make mods. then I can come up with something that works for me.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 10:17 PM
  #16  
SpecialK's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 06-09-06
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Lyons
I think another reflash, a fuel pump, and cams would honestly be a good way to go. I dunno how goo dthe SS/SC cams are stock or how much power that can be uncorked that way. But there are still other ways to get mor eperformance out of it without squeeze. I honestly think GM is doing the nitrous because it will cool the intake as it expands mainly. Hell everyone here knows the heat exchanger is lacking once you mod the car and begin to run it hard.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 10:34 PM
  #17  
StinkBOMB's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-11-06
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 0
From: Hubert NC
Originally Posted by SpecialK
I think another reflash, a fuel pump, and cams would honestly be a good way to go. I dunno how goo dthe SS/SC cams are stock or how much power that can be uncorked that way. But there are still other ways to get mor eperformance out of it without squeeze. I honestly think GM is doing the nitrous because it will cool the intake as it expands mainly. Hell everyone here knows the heat exchanger is lacking once you mod the car and begin to run it hard.
Whoaaa there, you're putting way too much faith in a GM dealerships service bay. The local dealerships here aren't up to par with a Stage 2 kit, much less anything involving anything close to actual mechanic work. I've seen way too many scratched heads and really offended sounding "I've never heard of that"s.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 10:44 PM
  #18  
Waylin22's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-28-05
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 0
From: AZ
I voted create my own..just because im going my own route with HP. and what did you mean by "bigger injectors?" 42's or the 60's? I do agree that the set up starting the thread is a better idea than no2. No2 IMO is a bad idea..
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 11:07 PM
  #19  
SpecialK's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 06-09-06
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Lyons
Originally Posted by StinkBOMB
Whoaaa there, you're putting way too much faith in a GM dealerships service bay. The local dealerships here aren't up to par with a Stage 2 kit, much less anything involving anything close to actual mechanic work. I've seen way too many scratched heads and really offended sounding "I've never heard of that"s.
Good point, though the fuel pump even an idiot can do. Swapping pulleys isnt' gonna give you a whole lot unless you cool the charge though. Hice the nitrous. I bet it'll eb some real small ass shot and the whole system for injectint it will be sealed with epoxy or some **** so you can put in a larger jet without them noticing.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 11:15 PM
  #20  
arsenal21's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-10-04
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Originally Posted by zinner
Sorry but thats not anything close to a real stage 3.
I Concurr.....
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 11:22 PM
  #21  
rnjmur's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-06-06
Posts: 2,729
Likes: 9
From: O Fallon, MO
I'd think something more like this:

1. 2.7" pulley
2. 60# injectors
3. GM extruded honed manifold w/ GM cat-back exhaust
4. Reflash
5. One step colder plugs (NGK BKR7EIX)

This would still keep the supercharger under redline and boost numbers from stage 2 by about 25 HP and 30 TQ which would still safely be under the stock engine limit of 300 HP and the transmission safe limit of 260 TQ.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 08:34 AM
  #22  
zinner's Avatar
Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: 08-26-04
Posts: 4,944
Likes: 2
From: RTP, NC
I think stage 3 is going to need some new parts like the 300 HP LSJ build.

Forged Pistons
Stronger Valve springs
Neutral balance shafts

The HP different between a 2.8 and 2.5 is really not much, it's just a difference in the torque.

You are going to need to break the 300 WHP limits. (which I think the 300 HP LSJ will do)...
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 08:35 AM
  #23  
CTCOBALTSSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-21-06
Posts: 7,917
Likes: 2
From: CT
Originally Posted by Waylin22
I voted create my own..just because im going my own route with HP. and what did you mean by "bigger injectors?" 42's or the 60's? I do agree that the set up starting the thread is a better idea than no2. No2 IMO is a bad idea..
Yeah I was thinking 60lb.ers for injectors. This way if you had an intake or full exhaust and what not, those injectors wouldn't even come close to maxing out their duty cycle.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 12:47 PM
  #24  
SchwarzCamaroRS's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-19-06
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Temecula, CA
but also if its a GM licensed stage kit they have to make it affordable and Do-able... the stg 2 kit isnt much different from stg 1, so they probably wouldnt change much for the stg 3. make it be like $1200 + install or $500 + install up from stg 2 (since its a new exhaust). You guys are acting like GM actually wants to do something that benefits us more than them... the manifold might suck, but its GM.. They wont put in NGK BKR7E's cuz they aren't GM... Pulley, Injectors, Tune, and the exhaust idea sound pretty good for GM. All of us know the potential of these motors with aftermarket stuff, but GM isnt trying to show us potential, they are trying to make money by giving us what they "think" we want...
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 12:57 PM
  #25  
CTCOBALTSSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-21-06
Posts: 7,917
Likes: 2
From: CT
Originally Posted by SchwarzCamaroRS
but also if its a GM licensed stage kit they have to make it affordable and Do-able... the stg 2 kit isnt much different from stg 1, so they probably wouldnt change much for the stg 3. make it be like $1200 + install or $500 + install up from stg 2 (since its a new exhaust). You guys are acting like GM actually wants to do something that benefits us more than them... the manifold might suck, but its GM.. They wont put in NGK BKR7E's cuz they aren't GM... Pulley, Injectors, Tune, and the exhaust idea sound pretty good for GM. All of us know the potential of these motors with aftermarket stuff, but GM isnt trying to show us potential, they are trying to make money by giving us what they "think" we want...
Exactly. This stage 3 would make more sense.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 PM.