Can we use 87 octane with no problems?
#1
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 10-20-05
Location: St.Louis
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can we use 87 octane with no problems?
I have been reading around the fourm and have yet to see anything bout the 2.2 but i see that both the 2.4 and 2.0 is suppose to have 93+ I read that the 2.0 can use 87 with no problems tho.. I am just curious to whether i will be forking over the extra 30 cents (which some ppl may not think is alot but i have to drive 100 miles a day for work at this time) Thanks for any answers
#2
I have a 05 LS Sedan, I run 87 Octane, As a matter of fact...I have ran 90 and 93 Octane both and don't see any real difference. I do notice that I get better mileage with
the 87 Octane. (that's because it doesn't burn as hot) I drive 64 miles round trip back
and forth to work everyday, so mileage is important.
the 87 Octane. (that's because it doesn't burn as hot) I drive 64 miles round trip back
and forth to work everyday, so mileage is important.
#3
360 L337 User
Join Date: 08-11-05
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 7,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I get lessened response in the SS SC when I do not use high test. But the book says you can run less if your are driving long trips on the highway. but i would rather spend the 30 cents and have the performance i wanted initially when i bought the car
#4
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 10-20-05
Location: St.Louis
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good to hear thanks and Cobaltz007 i can understand y you would pay the 30 cents extra if it messes with performance. Just at this time being and probaly not untill around 10000 miles on the car will i be worrying about any kind of performance Also i wonder when they release the S/C for the 2.2 I wonder if we will see the same effects to performance with it installed using 87 octane?? I would guess so tho
#5
the 2.2 has a lower compression ratio than the 2.0sc. not sure on the 2.4 . so the 2.2 can run fine on 87 ,but u need the 92 to avoid detonation in the higher compression 2.0 or u may experience a loss in power,loss of fuel economy or worse case detonation.i use 87 in my 2.2 and it runs fine.
#6
the 2.4 has the highest compression, followed by the 2.2L and the 2.0L. on the 2.2L there is no need to run anything higher than 87 octane unless you are heavily modified.
#8
Junior Member
Join Date: 02-02-05
Location: Burlington,Ontario
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have an SS/SC so I use the higher octane,however I thought that the 2.2L only calls for 87 octane. If your motor is designed to run on regular octane then there is very little benefit to running higher octane.
Steve.
Steve.
#10
The 2.4L VVT and the 2.0L Supercharged are the only ones that recommend use of 91+ octane. The 2.2L is designed to perform best on 87 octane.
2.2L 10:1 CR
2.4L 10.4:1 CR
2.0L SC 9.5:1 CR
2.2L 10:1 CR
2.4L 10.4:1 CR
2.0L SC 9.5:1 CR
#12
Originally Posted by 06LSCobalt
Good to hear thanks and Cobaltz007 i can understand y you would pay the 30 cents extra if it messes with performance. Just at this time being and probaly not untill around 10000 miles on the car will i be worrying about any kind of performance Also i wonder when they release the S/C for the 2.2 I wonder if we will see the same effects to performance with it installed using 87 octane?? I would guess so tho
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-20-05
Location: Buckeye, Az
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
87 is fine for the 2.2..using higher octane will make no power difference; don't waste your money. As long as you don't have high compression, FI, or n20, 87 octane is the way to go.
#16
Originally Posted by Fast Freddy
After spending goog money on a great car dont get cheap with the gas!! your looking at an extra 4.00 a tankful. Nothing but 93 in mine.
But if you've got extra gas money to burn let me put that towards my 87 octane.
#17
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 09-29-05
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This entire arguement comes down to one fine point. If you've got access to a scan tool... monitor your Knock Retard... If you get anything more than 0 KR with 87, try a higher grade or a different station and see what happens.
If you get knock from 93 there is something seriously awry with your car.
If you get knock from 93 there is something seriously awry with your car.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-02-05
Location: The East Coast
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have experimented with all three "Standard" grades of gas. I dont like 87 because I feel like I go through it like its water.
I will as a standard use 89, and thats where I get my ideal gas milage.
Sometimes I will put in 93, to the ends of my car having what feels like better throttle response. Not nessesarily more power, but a little bit more kick.
Over all though, 89 is best for 2.2 in my opinion. There is no need for premium, unless you switch to forced induction, then its a must to run 93 (or 91 for you high elevation folks)
I will as a standard use 89, and thats where I get my ideal gas milage.
Sometimes I will put in 93, to the ends of my car having what feels like better throttle response. Not nessesarily more power, but a little bit more kick.
Over all though, 89 is best for 2.2 in my opinion. There is no need for premium, unless you switch to forced induction, then its a must to run 93 (or 91 for you high elevation folks)
#23
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 10-20-05
Location: St.Louis
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Psycho
You can run 87 unless you have a higer comp ratio than 9to1