2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

Cobalt ss beating a LS (turbo'd) unlikely? Finally proven

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2005, 10:26 AM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
CobaltBurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-05
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im not impressed with the SS, maybe i had to much buildup to it?
CobaltBurst is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 10:27 AM
  #52  
The Stig
 
MarcS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-05
Location: New York
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by CobaltBurst
im not impressed with the SS, maybe i had to much buildup to it?
Give it a rest
MarcS is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 10:29 AM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
CobaltBurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-05
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all I said is i wasnt impressed? lol now i cant even have my own opinions?
CobaltBurst is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 10:31 AM
  #54  
The Stig
 
MarcS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-05
Location: New York
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by CobaltBurst
all I said is i wasnt impressed? lol now i cant even have my own opinions?
If you want to act like a fanboy go ahead.

we all know your opinion from your other 50 posts on this thread.
MarcS is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 10:32 AM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
CobaltBurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-05
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go chevy!
CobaltBurst is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 10:33 AM
  #56  
The Stig
 
MarcS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-05
Location: New York
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by CobaltBurst
Go chevy!
Well that I can't agrue with
MarcS is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 10:34 AM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
CobaltBurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-05
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CobaltBurst is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 12:10 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
celicacobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-26-05
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i knew a turbo 2.2 would own an ss
celicacobalt is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 12:21 PM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
phxSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-20-05
Location: Buckeye, Az
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let's have a contest..whaever mod the 2.2 does, the 2.0 will do. Then we'll have a contest. Besides, you will spend the same, if not more than buying an SS once you upgrade the tranny, tires, wheels, brakes, and exhaust. Oh yea, BTW, if you make displcement an issue, I'll just bore out my motor, now what do you have to say?
phxSS is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 12:23 PM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
CobaltBurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-05
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im going to laugh when a 2.4L comes over here
CobaltBurst is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 12:35 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
phxSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-20-05
Location: Buckeye, Az
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's fine too. Put anything you want on your 2.4 or 2.2 WITHOUT tocuhing the inside of your motor. In other words, all the bolt-ons and boost you want, as long as the inside of your engine isn't touched. then a 2.0 will do the same, then see what the outcome is.
phxSS is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 12:38 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
celicacobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-26-05
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well for me i like both cars in different ways but chevy didnt care about power when they built the ss, if they did they would have made it to compete with the srt 4 but they didnt , they wanted reliability so they went with a supercharger which is fine for a daily driver but it wil never compare to a turbo and twin charging is never good so an ss may be able to be fasterr but it will have to scrap the supercharger to do it
celicacobalt is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 12:43 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
 
Permafried-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-21-05
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 5,060
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by halfcent
Getting back to the orignal topic... Sorry, guys but I have to do it....

I'm calling Bull ****.

Jiveturkeys account gives no pics. He provides no details as to what kit he installed. Doesn't say who his Cobalt SS friend is. And then, stopped posting after only one reply.

I don't doubt that a turbo charged Cobalt will be able to outperform a supercharged one. I just don't think Jiveturkey actually has one.
This is actually the main reason I asked what turbo kit he was running and if he had pics...I didn't want to outwardly call bullshit but it's pretty tough to believe anything without some sort of proof and at least seeing the kit installed would have been a start. There's just a number of inconsistencies between his original post and the single reply I am assuming in response to my post about re-building the engine...and I don't know about anyone else but I wouldn't be wild about blowing 8psi worth of hot air into my engine.

I also believe and T/C 2.2 could run with a stock 2.0 but as for some who seem to believe the 2.0 doesn't have much potential the simple fact it was built for F/I pretty much throws that theory out the window. Try upping the boost to 10 or 12 psi even with a S/C on the 2.2 and report back to us what happened...I'm sure 99% of us know what the outcome will be .

You also can't compare the price difference between an LS and an SS/SC directly since there are more differences between the two vehicles than just the S/C under the hood. Do the research and you'll find to bring the LS up to nearly the exact specs of the SS is going to cost you a hell of a lot more in aftermarket parts than the $4000 to $5000 difference.

Permafried-
Permafried- is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 12:57 PM
  #64  
Member
 
pkskull77's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-04-05
Location: ??????
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know about you guys, but I'm not buying this story at all. Not to call you out or anything but can we get some pictures. Furthermore, why haven't you told anyone who asked where the kit came from. This project seems like a big deal I don't understand why you wouldn't be anxious to show off your handy work.
pkskull77 is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 03:41 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
tiny's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-16-05
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by halfcent
Jiveturkeys account gives no pics. He provides no details as to what kit he installed. Doesn't say who his Cobalt SS friend is. And then, stopped posting after only one reply.
it hasnt even been 24 hours, holy ****, give the guy a break
he's getting so much **** for this post
i believe him
tiny is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 04:19 PM
  #66  
New Member
 
skydragon26's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-30-05
Location: Jackson, NJ
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.... 2.2 and 2.0 both have a lot of potenical but right now at this moment ihn time 2.2 has more aftermarket parts =)
skydragon26 is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 05:40 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
Cobalt30's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-05
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LS with 75 shot of Nos can beat a SS and only costs 12,500
__________________
no it cant. do you plan on holding that nitrous down through all 5 gears? to get that "220" HP if it actully does give you 75 hp? You only use nitrous at WOT. So when your racing your 2.2 cobalt ur going to be using ur 145 hp till you get to either 4th or 5th gear when u can have the time to hold the nitrous down for 10 seconds or so.


ryan
Cobalt30 is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 05:57 PM
  #68  
Senior Member
 
CobaltBurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-05
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ive decided to end with this, engine is a 2.2L

Well some of you may know me and some may not. Currently I have the fastest street legal Cavalier in North America according to the JBO lists. Running 12.80s on the stock internals, stock clutch, stock axles, stock CVs, stock everything basically with a turbo thrown onto the motor.
Go ahead and ramble on though just thought this was interesting...
CobaltBurst is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 07:20 PM
  #69  
tio
Junior Member
 
tio's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-02-05
Location: Burlington,Ontario
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Holy **** ppl ! This troll must be laughing his ass off about this one. Are all of you too young to know that "JiveTurkey" is 70s slang for "bullshiter" ?
tio is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 07:29 PM
  #70  
Senior Member
 
phxSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-20-05
Location: Buckeye, Az
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^ you would know, tio lol
phxSS is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 08:54 PM
  #71  
Senior Member
 
FLCobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-24-05
Location: florida
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i think a 2.2 turbo would beat an SS but i still love the ss
FLCobalt is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 08:55 PM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
FLCobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-24-05
Location: florida
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
people are sooooo worried about voiding the warranty. Man chevys are good cars, the chances of you engine blowing is low unless you got a lemon or unless your putting to much stress on your engine without upgrades.
FLCobalt is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 09:15 PM
  #73  
Senior Member
 
phxSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-20-05
Location: Buckeye, Az
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly. "Too much stress on your engine without upgrades" is key point here.
phxSS is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 09:18 PM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
CobaltBurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-05
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yup i like the ss's i wanna get some inserts in my leather seats of orange, might get a upholstery shop to do it, it would look bad ass.
CobaltBurst is offline  
Old 10-04-2005, 10:25 PM
  #75  
Senior Member
 
wikkymaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-26-05
Location: illinois
Posts: 1,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i cant wait till i get some boooooooost, gotta start saving my money so i can get some stuff by summer
wikkymaster is offline  


Quick Reply: Cobalt ss beating a LS (turbo'd) unlikely? Finally proven



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 AM.