2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

Destroking an L61 and compression ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21, 2012 | 12:07 AM
  #1  
08baltls's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
Destroking an L61 and compression ratios

Does anyone know what kind of compression ratio I would see by destroking an L61 with an LSJ crank? Just asking out of curiousity.
Reply
Old May 21, 2012 | 12:19 AM
  #2  
Axelthered05's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: 05-05-09
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 10
From: Allen TX
interesting ...curious as to why you would want to?
Reply
Old May 21, 2012 | 12:24 AM
  #3  
08baltls's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
Well I was talking to someone the other day who brought up the idea. I did some searching and saw GM did it on a race engine. The block and bore are the same between the L61 and LSJ, its just the stroke difference between the two, one being for forced induction and the other being for natural aspiration. I think its a 94mm stroke on the L61 and an 86mm on the LSJ. L61 has a 10CR and LSJ is 9.5. Im wondering if destroking would drop it down to 9.5 or if it would be different from the LSJ.
Reply
Old May 21, 2012 | 01:46 AM
  #4  
Jesse's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 09-07-11
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 117
From: Las Cruces, NM
WARNING: TECHNICAL BS

You would have problems with piston-to-deck clearance if you simply changed cranks, because you would increase "quench" and effectively lower your compression ratio. (Quench is the room left from the top of the piston to the bottom of the head, including the head gasket.) "Quench" would be much too large if someone swapped cranks. Here's a quick example to help: A small block chevy V8 has a deck height(from the middle of the crankshaft to the top of the deck WITH NO HEAD GASKET) of 9.025". Say someone wants to know what compression distance he needs his pistons to have. (Compression distance basically means from the top of the piston to the middle of the wrist pin on the piston.)

1: The stroke of a 350 is 3.48", but you need to divide by half so that means 1.74"
2: Connecting rods are typically 5.7"
3: Add these together and you have 7.44"
4: Subtract the 9.025" to get the remaining space. This is 1.585"
5: Head gaskets for a typical sbc are .015", and IIRC you want a quench of about .040" This means you want to have 1.560" compression distance.


Say you built this engine but are a complete ******* and put a 3.25" crank in accidentally. Now instead of a .040" quench you now have .155" quench. That's 4 times what you need! You engine will now run like **** and it isn't because the compression ratio.

____________________________________________

IN A NUTSHELL, WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU:

It can be done but you will either need to use LSJ pistons or get custom ones made. Or use a different sized connecting rod. Custom-piston is the route I was going to with a chevy V8 build. Was going to take a 307 and put a 400 crank in it but would need hella oddball pistons.
Reply
Old May 21, 2012 | 01:50 AM
  #5  
1LowLS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-16-10
Posts: 8,383
Likes: 1
From: Queen Creek,AZ
Why would you de stroke it?If your doing the work,keep the stroke and get lower compression pistons.The LSJ and L61 are the same bore and the L61 has a longer stroke,so if you were to run the same stroke as a LSJ it would drop it to 2.0L.Not sure what CR it would drop to though
Reply
Old May 21, 2012 | 02:10 AM
  #6  
Jesse's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 09-07-11
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 117
From: Las Cruces, NM
Originally Posted by 1LowLS
Why would you de stroke it?If your doing the work,keep the stroke and get lower compression pistons.The LSJ and L61 are the same bore and the L61 has a longer stroke,so if you were to run the same stroke as a LSJ it would drop it to 2.0L.Not sure what CR it would drop to though
Assuming the 2.2L has a 55cc combustion chamber, -3cc dish maximum, and a .05" head gasket(not sure about this one) it would put you around 9.25-9.5:1.
Reply
Old May 21, 2012 | 07:40 AM
  #7  
08baltls's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-01-11
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 1
From: Joshua, TX
Originally Posted by supernovanator
Assuming the 2.2L has a 55cc combustion chamber, -3cc dish maximum, and a .05" head gasket(not sure about this one) it would put you around 9.25-9.5:1.
Cool. That's what I was thinking but I wasn't sure what it would do to compression ratio. We were just talking about it the other day and I was looking into it more just for shots and giggles. The biggest reason is because racecar. Lmao
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DarrenGC
2.2L L61 Performance Tech
18
Dec 24, 2021 01:55 PM
ThoR294
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
4
Oct 4, 2015 08:44 PM
Trav3480
Problems/Service/Maintenance
0
Oct 1, 2015 08:17 PM
DocSvensk
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
7
Sep 27, 2015 02:24 PM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
Sep 26, 2015 06:44 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 AM.