2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

Disturbing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 11:01 PM
  #1  
Mike85220's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 04-18-07
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
From: Apache Junction, AZ
Disturbing

I just watched YouTube and watched the Stock 2.2 Cobalt 0-60 in 8 seconds video and then watched a video of a 2.4 with a GMPP exhaust and GMPP intake and it was upsetting.
The 2.4 had a 0-60 of 8.7 seconds, .7 seconds slower.

I know that the 2.4 has to have something wrong with it or the passenger in the 2.4 weighs 500 lbs.

Is this common? I mean come on, a two bolt on 2.4 being .7 seconds slower than the 2.2?

I now worry about getting GMPP bolt ons.

I thought about how one driver could be better than the other, but the video shows that both were floored and getting up there in the RPMS, no faultering to be seen. I could be wrong, I am not an expert on this.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 11:05 PM
  #2  
jschatte's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-30-07
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 0
From: Moose Jaw / Regina, Sask
im pretty sure those parts arent gonna decrease your preformance. I dont know whats up with the videos
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 11:06 PM
  #3  
RedBalt44's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-18-09
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Fort Leonard Wood, MO
has to be the drivers. in my stock 2.4 i can do 0-60 in 7 seconds.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 11:07 PM
  #4  
Mike85220's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 04-18-07
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
From: Apache Junction, AZ
Watch the lag on the 2.4 from 54-60mph, its like it hangs there too long.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 11:09 PM
  #5  
dunit121's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-21-09
Posts: 2,846
Likes: 0
From: vero beach fl
he needs a driver mod
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 11:11 PM
  #6  
jschatte's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-30-07
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 0
From: Moose Jaw / Regina, Sask
Originally Posted by dunit121
he needs a driver mod
lol!
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 11:11 PM
  #7  
jsscooby's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-08-07
Posts: 3,868
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by RedBalt44
has to be the drivers. in my stock 2.4 i can do 0-60 in 7 seconds.
ditto. stock time is like 7.1 right
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 11:13 PM
  #8  
Projekt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 24,270
Likes: 1
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
dont beleive everything you see on youtube?

2.4 is faster then a 2.2. stock for stock obviously.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 11:14 PM
  #9  
gearhead07's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-13-09
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: skook,PA
"dont belive everything u see on tv"
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 11:52 PM
  #10  
blackbolt89's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-28-08
Posts: 5,068
Likes: 0
From: New Milford, NJ
i know i can whoop a 2.4

stock for modded that is :P
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 07:23 PM
  #11  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
Couple of possibilities:
The 2.4 owner is using 87 octane fuel -- which will most likely cause the knock sensor to reduce power.
GMPP Touring exhaust is only 2 1/8 inch ID, stock is supposedly mostly 2.5" -- I got rid of my Touring because I felt it slowed my 2.4.
If it is auto could be starting off in "D" and the traction control is kicking in -- also reduces power until 4K rpm

Simple fact is 20 -- 30 HP is not big enough to make a HUGE difference in performance...but if any of the three possibilities above happens it makes the 2.4 ssslllooowwweeerrr...
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 08:14 PM
  #12  
Mike85220's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 04-18-07
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
From: Apache Junction, AZ
He must be running the 87 like you said, needs and oil change bad, a new fuel filter, needs to know how to drive plus he and his passenger must weigh 300 pounds each.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2009 | 12:59 AM
  #13  
dunit121's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-21-09
Posts: 2,846
Likes: 0
From: vero beach fl
maybe if he added a tow hook in the front and a fire extinguisher on the a pillar and cut the holes in the back bumper he would go faster....
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2009 | 12:06 PM
  #14  
massivematt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-15-06
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Foristell, MO
i can usually do 0-60 in bout 5.5 seconds
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2009 | 12:40 PM
  #15  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
Originally Posted by massivematt
i can usually do 0-60 in bout 5.5 seconds
ZZZZZZZZZZZ...wha...Oh, not important...ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2009 | 01:35 PM
  #16  
Mike85220's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 04-18-07
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
From: Apache Junction, AZ
Your 2.2 can do 0-60 in less time than a 2001 Trans Am?
What mods do you have? Turbo intercooled plus all the bolt ons?
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2009 | 01:56 PM
  #17  
dunit121's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-21-09
Posts: 2,846
Likes: 0
From: vero beach fl
Originally Posted by Mike85220
Your 2.2 can do 0-60 in less time than a 2001 Trans Am?
What mods do you have? Turbo intercooled plus all the bolt ons?
mad parts yo
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 PM.