I've been wondering about this, stock for stock or modded equally the same which is quicker?

Is the only difference the 2.4 manifold on the LAP?

 

L61 is...i drove a lap and it is dog ****

 

L61 is...i drove a lap and it is dog **** yes it was an auto but i was very dissapointed considering the higher horsepower rating

 

LAP also has VVT

 

lap has the newer crappier 2.4 manifold, not the older good one...its a drivers race

 

VVT..



L61 > LAP. I also drove a 5-speed LAP, exact same options as when my L61 was stock, and, let me tell you, LAP = turd.

 

and to think, the cruze will be an ultra turd. the top model, a damn diesel, gets 150hp. the models under that are a joke, unless they plan on selling em 10g's a piece, they won't get any real sales off em.

 

I haven't driven an LAP, but I would rather have my L61 over it. The LAP gets it's max torque and HP at a higher RPM than the L61 plus it loses a bit on the low end cause of that.

 

My LAP was like a dog. I haven't driven an L61 so I can't make a comparison, but it was enough for me to add a SC at 4500 miles!

 

drove it again just to see if i was crazy and yep absolute dog ****

 

over the months i wonder if this has changed?! ...

old thread revival go!

 

L61 = win

 

They're both dogs stock, so it is like which one is worse, really.

 

I have an l61 and my mom has a lap. I have a 2.4 mani,injen intake and a catback but no tune, so I'm basically stock speed/power. Both are autos, I notice a difference in the power band but neither one really amde me say, wow, faster