Max diameter exhaust for 2.2
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: 02-08-08
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville/Linden, NC/Myrtle Beach, SC
LOL same thing I tried!. I found that 2.25 or 2.5 worked best. I went the 3" route before my ss exaust change over, big mistake. I found it lost power and sounded horrible. Get yourself a 2.25 ss exhaust, which is a direct bolt in, a lightly used one can be had for cheap, with a good muffler, and you'd be good to go.
Why would an engine need backpressure to function though? Thats like saying that your intake manifold needs restrictions and turbulence in order for your engine to run smoothly. In effect, backpressure "pushes down" on the piston during the exhaust stroke which takes velocity away from any piston in the power stroke. Backpressure = loss of power. The real issue is having the exhaust velocity high.
heres kind of an explaination of what i was trying to say. if you put a massive pipe on a basically stock 4 cyl engine, its gonna drive like crap because it just wont have the low end pep that everyone is looking for.
http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/freq...kpressure.html
heres kind of an explaination of what i was trying to say. if you put a massive pipe on a basically stock 4 cyl engine, its gonna drive like crap because it just wont have the low end pep that everyone is looking for.
heres kind of an explaination of what i was trying to say. if you put a massive pipe on a basically stock 4 cyl engine, its gonna drive like crap because it just wont have the low end pep that everyone is looking for.
of course putting a pipe that's too big is not good, but it's not because of backpressure.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: 02-08-08
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville/Linden, NC/Myrtle Beach, SC
Werent you the one who did the spitball in a straw analogy?
http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/freq...kpressure.html
heres kind of an explaination of what i was trying to say. if you put a massive pipe on a basically stock 4 cyl engine, its gonna drive like crap because it just wont have the low end pep that everyone is looking for.
heres kind of an explaination of what i was trying to say. if you put a massive pipe on a basically stock 4 cyl engine, its gonna drive like crap because it just wont have the low end pep that everyone is looking for.
I think I was one of the first to post the Cobb article, after all they are right out my back door of my shop. I have talked to a couple of the guys over there about exhaust and other things. That and have had a couple of my cars on there Dyno.
Quick physics lesson hot gasses flow faster to big of an exhaust and the gas cools down thus like XM15 stated you loose the scavenging effect loosing low end TQ.
Quick physics lesson hot gasses flow faster to big of an exhaust and the gas cools down thus like XM15 stated you loose the scavenging effect loosing low end TQ.
Theres only 3 reasons we need exhaust pipes at all:
1.To carry spent gases safely away from driver/cockpit/enginebay
2. To keep atmosphere from entering the exhaust port, and burning the head/valves.
3. To tune the speed/scavenge quality of the spent gases for the application.
Cliff Notes: Dont need backpressure, backpressure is bad.
2.5" max on a streetable NA
1.To carry spent gases safely away from driver/cockpit/enginebay
2. To keep atmosphere from entering the exhaust port, and burning the head/valves.
3. To tune the speed/scavenge quality of the spent gases for the application.
Cliff Notes: Dont need backpressure, backpressure is bad.
2.5" max on a streetable NA


