2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

My Dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 08:15 PM
  #1  
madmark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
From: FT Knox KY
My Dyno

i took my car to the dyno with some focus people. i am very sad, i expected alot more

it was 143whp and 145.1 tq
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 08:17 PM
  #2  
IonFeright's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-24-07
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clarita, Ca
Those are actually some pretty good #'s for your mods.

I was running 2 steps colder plugs when I dynoed n/a. With normal plugs I probably would've been right where youre at.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 09:21 PM
  #3  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
Thats more than me, and I have comparable mods.

You do realize that those numbers come out to around 168 hp at the crank; thats not bad at all.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 09:29 PM
  #4  
g5mike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-17-06
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
From: Moncton Newbrunswick Can.
Originally Posted by IonFeright
Those are actually some pretty good #'s for your mods.

I was running 2 steps colder plugs when I dynoed n/a. With normal plugs I probably would've been right where youre at.
I agree nice numbers, when you consider stock numbers and what you are laying down now
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 09:39 PM
  #5  
madmark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
From: FT Knox KY
i did a/f dyno and it said i was running way rich, have any ideas for me to level that out
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 09:43 PM
  #6  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
You'll have to wait for tuning.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 09:44 PM
  #7  
blktrax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-15-06
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: .
Why are you disappointed? 10 to 15% drivetrain loss its spot on.




2.4 manifold, 2.4 Throttle body, better intake, anyway to get more air into the motor
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 09:46 PM
  #8  
madmark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
From: FT Knox KY
also cobaltfan06 went out there with us and his numbers seemed kinda low also.

127ish whp and i dont remember the tq but im sure he will chime in

i have a friend with hptuners and he said he will play around with it on my car.when i get the graph on the computer ill post pics of the dyno
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #9  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
hptuners doesn't support the 2.2 yet. Rumor has it that they will support the 07's on their next release though. Was cobaltfan06 stock?
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 09:49 PM
  #10  
madmark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
From: FT Knox KY
same mods as me but it was an automatic
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 09:53 PM
  #11  
nonSS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-05-07
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: Fenton MO
^^ i will prob be one of the first ppl to chime in on the hp tuners bc i sent them vcm suite infolog from my 07 2.2 and there gonna test to see if it works and they said sometime this week they should know
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 09:57 PM
  #12  
CobaltFan06's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-07
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: Dover AFB, DE
Yeah we didn't get to do tq on mine, but the best run i had was 127.7... it was hot as f*ck though and high humidity, sure that had alot to do with it
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 10:06 PM
  #13  
umrdyldo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-06-06
Posts: 11,663
Likes: 65
From: MO
IF you can stand the power band shifting, go with the 2.4 Intake manifold. It leaned the test car out.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 10:18 PM
  #14  
CobaltFan06's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-07
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: Dover AFB, DE
Oh and mark when you get it, post up the video of our dynos
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 10:25 PM
  #15  
madmark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
From: FT Knox KY
they did my dyno in 4th and cobaltfan06 in 3rd and his kept downshifting to second lmao.then we couldnt get a rpm reading because of our coil system =\

my a/f went from way over 18 at 2rpms and then at 6200 rpms it was at 11, im not to good with these graphs but they said my factory tune is making me run rich
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 10:28 PM
  #16  
CobaltFan06's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-07
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: Dover AFB, DE
friggin automatics haha, i NEED a tune sooo bad dude it sucks
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 10:30 PM
  #17  
blktrax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-15-06
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: .
It's WAY rich. Thats why im doing all i can to stuff more air in there to lean it out.
2.4 intake manifold
GMPP intake tube
GMPP Sport Catback
151 WHP

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/2...77000761d5.htm
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 10:34 PM
  #18  
madmark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
From: FT Knox KY
i think im going to do the 2.4 manifold next and then ill try again
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 10:38 PM
  #19  
blktrax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-15-06
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: .
Straight up ppl on here have mixed opinions about it cause of some sacrifical tourqe loss at the midrange, I personaly won't be without it.

But to each their own opinion. I just dont want to seem biased just cause I tested it.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 10:48 PM
  #20  
Brucesblack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-15-06
Posts: 2,443
Likes: 0
From: Griffin Ga
well , im hoping to see these spec's soon on my 2.2 , mod's to come ,, 2.4 intake , ss/sc header / downpipe catless , and larger exhaust ,, i should be somewhere near these number's ?? right ??
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 10:55 PM
  #21  
blktrax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-15-06
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: .
Catless will accually hurt the tourqe curve a lil, (how much no one knows) but I'm going back to the dyno with a new part in 2 weeks

Originally Posted by Brucesblack
well , im hoping to see these spec's soon on my 2.2 , mod's to come ,, 2.4 intake , ss/sc header / downpipe catless , and larger exhaust ,, i should be somewhere near these number's ?? right ??
a expectable range of 146 to 152 should be, too many factors to say yes it will be X exactly.


http://videos.streetfire.net/video/2...77000761d5.htm

That vid was without the SS/SC (self honed) manifold, and BRAND NEW SS/SC down pipe.

SO it will be
GMPP Intake Tube
2.4 Intake Manifold
Part X
SS/SC Manifold
SS/SC Down Pipe
GMPP Sport Catback.

What i'm hopeing for is the return of the torque (solid line from 3000 to 5000RPMS) and +3 to +4 WHP
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 10:56 PM
  #22  
Brucesblack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-15-06
Posts: 2,443
Likes: 0
From: Griffin Ga
ok thanx for the info , + rep for ya , yea im gonna leave the cat on there !!
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 11:02 PM
  #23  
madmark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
From: FT Knox KY

freaken file wouldnt upload anywhere
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 11:06 PM
  #24  
blktrax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-15-06
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: .
you got an 06 or and 07? mark

http://www.crateenginedepot.com/stor...t-W67C144.aspx
HP

TQ
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 11:06 PM
  #25  
madmark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
From: FT Knox KY
07 ls
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:32 PM.