2.4 dyno results after mods and ecu
Senior Member
Joined: 07-06-04
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 2
From: Spaceball 1 or better known as CT
Originally Posted by jerryg
i have never posted any pics on the internet so im not to sure how im gonna go to my friends to do it
pnrcomps@optonline.net
I hate to be the bearer of bad news BUT.. We've tuned more 2.4L's than anyone else and to be honest those numbers are WAY high.. We've done tons of Sol's Col's ect.. and even perfectly tuned they only make around 160-170 to the tires on a mustang dyno or about 170-180 to the tires on a Dynojet. I'm guessing this was a happy dyno, most likely not even a dynojet?
Senior Member
Joined: 06-28-05
Posts: 4,194
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, DE
I am not saying this because I own an SS/SC but because your N/A car rated at 170hp is putting out 40 more horsepower than stock. I don't think those numbers are correct.
I have also seen a 2.4 SS dyno in at 158whp stock....
But If your car takes that well to mods, I am about to sell my SS/SC and pick up a 2.4 because you should be running mid 14's with those numbers.
I have also seen a 2.4 SS dyno in at 158whp stock....
But If your car takes that well to mods, I am about to sell my SS/SC and pick up a 2.4 because you should be running mid 14's with those numbers.
New Member
Joined: 05-11-05
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: ontario
He must have been in 2nd gear 
I own a SS/SC and have a 2.4 SS for the week through work and their is quite a diffference in every department. Suspension, gear ratios, clutch, and engine. I doubt those mods will even get your WHP to 180.
Lets see the pics and what gear were you in.
I own a SS/SC and have a 2.4 SS for the week through work and their is quite a diffference in every department. Suspension, gear ratios, clutch, and engine. I doubt those mods will even get your WHP to 180.
Lets see the pics and what gear were you in.
Senior Member
Joined: 02-28-06
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
From: Greensburg (PA)
Originally Posted by GTPprix
I hate to be the bearer of bad news BUT.. We've tuned more 2.4L's than anyone else and to be honest those numbers are WAY high.. We've done tons of Sol's Col's ect.. and even perfectly tuned they only make around 160-170 to the tires on a mustang dyno or about 170-180 to the tires on a Dynojet. I'm guessing this was a happy dyno, most likely not even a dynojet?
I am thinking they reported flywheel numbers to Jerry, it has to be. Which with drivetrain loses would be around 170ish whp.
Senior Member
Joined: 02-28-06
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
From: Greensburg (PA)
Originally Posted by celicacobalt
well 180 whp is still pretty decent
Oh yeah..with equivalent torque numbers and curb weight around 2800lbs or so yeah it is now Si territory. Figuring in a driveline loss of 15% of 210 or so puts it right around 180-185 whp and torque.
Senior Member
Joined: 07-22-05
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
From: Quebec City, Quebec
Originally Posted by jerryg
guys your not going to believe the numbers i just got today. I will post the the picture of the dyno later but for now here are the numbers. 211.62 horse power and 208.99 torque. i could not believe it but youll see for yourself later. i was a little rich from about 45oo rpm all the way to rev limit but maybe westers garage can do something about it.
Banned
Joined: 12-13-04
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Awesome numbers man, can't wait to see the dyno chart
And all the fanboys say only Honda's can make that kind of power N/A. Not to mention you're making like 100 more ft/lbs of torque than a Honda 4 banger
And all the fanboys say only Honda's can make that kind of power N/A. Not to mention you're making like 100 more ft/lbs of torque than a Honda 4 banger
