omg, so we dropped those dyno readings from 210 -208whp and torque .. to 168 whp ? thats like so fking sad =(

 

ok someone post a damn dyno sheet already! no buddy cares about anything else just post the damn sheet and if u were smart u can tell everything ur self if ur dumb then learn more about cars and u will understand it better.. this post has went to long...

 

listen you idiot i know way more about cars then you do. i never said i had 211 whp i said it was horse power. thats what was told to me by a pro. so why dont you get enough ***** and some money to do it yourself. then you post the dyno.

 

aight all u guys need to calm down. those numbers are actually verry good. he's on a mustang dyno, and for you 2.2 who think you'll put down those numbers w/ an intake and exhaust are tripping. and are thinking like a ricer that an intake is 15hp and exhaust is 20whp. so u guys owe this man an appology, cuz for producing almost 160whp on a mustang dyno is verry good thats close to 195-200hp at the flywheel. so those are verry good numbers. so he's gained around 25hp which is excellent. for a basic tune. there is more potential. and look at his hp and tq curve it is verry nice and flat. this guy has a nice car here w/ a verry strong engine. keep up the good work man. and dont be discouraged by these others.. also dont need to lash out back, shows immaturity. be professional.

 

GTPprix, ok yeah I do see it around 4k. I am just used to the VTEC bumps and VVL bumps of about 15-20 whp which makes it look so much different. Also different dyno graphs than yours, but I do see it now. Funny when tuning the bump out of VTEC the owners would think the car was slower because they didn't fell the surge. Trying to explain horsepower "under" the curve to someone who wants to feel the surge proved tricky. Dyno graphs helped. Thanks.

 

i dont know if it makes a difference but it was a dynojet. im sorry for lashing out

 

where is the sheet ..

 

this **** is still going/?????? NEVER going to see a sheet

 

not everyone is a computer genius not saying that you are stupid or anything jerryg. And yes those are some awesome numbers.

 

Is this on a stock cobalt SS ?

 

No one is "tripping" but you. 2.2 dyno with intake, header, and exahust...off the street...no special tuning.....on a mustang dyno... https://www.cobaltss.net/gallery/sho...&searchid=1537 ...........and actually that's 191.8 at the flywheel.

 

No thats not a stock SS, the base run was done with injen CAI and axle back exhaust, the 159whp number was after the tune.

 

how do you get 191hp? I get 172.

1.15X150

 

if you let us down we may have to hurt you

 

It's an automatic.

 

You have it backwards, Torque is pressure applied. IE: Lbs/ Square inch and horsepower is a manmade number created from that. Torque is everything in a 1/4 mile race. It is what gets you moving. Thats why hondas have to launch at 5500-6000 to go anywhere off the line cause that is whne they start producing torque.

 

That dyno chart is from a Solstice with a CAI, cat-back, and their ECU tune.

 

Use putfile.com you upload the file to thier site then link it here. They are very easy to use, all of our Sol-Forum members use it.

 

 

Apparently you haven't read any Solstice dyno graphs then have you? It's a RWD car and it sees a near 24% drivetrain loss. Also some of the Cobalt 2.4L VVT members who have gotten dyno's are showing 145HP after CAI+cat-back which is about exactly what a Solstice shows with a CAI+cat-back but the Solstice has a higher initial HP value. Cobalts are showing on average a 20% drivetrain loss for the 2.4L VVT ECOTEC LE5.

 

what does the engine have to do with drive train loss?

 

Some forced induction engines even when on the same transmission don't show the same drivetrain loss values. Miata vs the Mazdaspeed Miata is a good example. The 1.8L NA Miata shows about a 25% drivetrain loss compared to the 1.8L Turbocharged which shows only a 17% drivetrain loss on the exact same hardware.

 

WTF remind me to never let you near my car if you ever work for any sort of dealer I want what ever your smoking.



your just an example why people say HP sells engines


but did you know that torque wins races

you have counterdicted your self already a bunch of times in this thread alone BWAHAAAAAA

 

Campo=idiot.

 

well let's look back on what you said. You said you got the car dynoed with all of your mods and you couldn't beleive the numbers you got! well getting numbers implies that they came from the dyno. It is far more likely that you will dyno whp than taking the engine out and dynoing chp. You are the idiot, you dont say you have dynoed 210hp when you ACTUALLY dynoed what was it 168?