celicacobalt dyno's
03-25-2006, 05:48 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 05-26-05
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-25-2006, 05:49 PM
#2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 05-26-05
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
there are 3 of them there the 1st is the first run on a loaded mustang dyno, the 2nd is another loaded run on a mustang dyno and the third is an unloaded dyno on a mustang dyno. enjoy.
03-26-2006, 08:50 PM
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 05-26-05
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brandon97Z
What were the numbers they are kinda hard to see.
2nd run = 144whp / 125 wtq
3rd run = 172 djhp / 147 djtq (dynojet)
i think the dynojet rates the whp but the rollers have no load on them like resistance like the normal mustang dyno does, i guess the mustang dyno adds resistance to simulate real raod conditions
03-26-2006, 08:51 PM
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 05-26-05
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by snowbred
why such a difference between 1st and second runs
03-26-2006, 08:52 PM
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 05-26-05
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mercury
I can't really make out the numbers on those sheets. What gears were these done in?
03-26-2006, 08:55 PM
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 05-26-05
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mycavisux97
i can;t read the numbers, can u re post it bigger?
2nd run = 144whp / 125 wtq
3rd run = 172 djhp / 147 djtq (dynojet)
03-26-2006, 10:26 PM
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: 11-11-05
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So when GM says the 2.4L has 171hp, which is it saying, the wheel hp or the flywheel hp? Which of these numbers above, ~143 hp ~172 hp does the car actually make on the road??
Why do we realy care about the flywheel hp? What we want to know is what it actually puts out while driving... on the road. So which is it??
Why do we realy care about the flywheel hp? What we want to know is what it actually puts out while driving... on the road. So which is it??
03-26-2006, 10:31 PM
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-10-05
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
on the road the car i think will be making 144whp / 125 wtq as celicacobalt said based on the loaded dyno
Those numbers seem pretty good for the mods he has and being an auto
Those numbers seem pretty good for the mods he has and being an auto
03-26-2006, 11:14 PM
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-17-05
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by avro206
good for the auto. The 5 speed should pck up a few hp and tq
03-27-2006, 12:25 AM
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnyNFullEffect
So when GM says the 2.4L has 171hp, which is it saying, the wheel hp or the flywheel hp? Which of these numbers above, ~143 hp ~172 hp does the car actually make on the road??
Why do we realy care about the flywheel hp? What we want to know is what it actually puts out while driving... on the road. So which is it??
Why do we realy care about the flywheel hp? What we want to know is what it actually puts out while driving... on the road. So which is it??
all factory hp ratings are listed at the crank due to the different drivetrain losses associated with fwd, awd, rwd, auto, manual, etc.
in essence, no you really shouldn't be concerned with flywheel hp...there would be no point since its not being put down to the ground.
