2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

How would win?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 1, 2012 | 11:34 PM
  #51  
StevoElSupremo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-01-10
Posts: 5,833
Likes: 26
From: Toronto, ON
lmao what a facepalm
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2012 | 11:42 PM
  #52  
turbosmart4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 12,240
Likes: 1
From: Alaska
3 pages now and no vids..... Smh....
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 12:24 AM
  #53  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,937
Likes: 94
From: Texas
Originally Posted by turbosmart4
3 pages now and no vids..... Smh....
Maybe because she hasn't raced yet. And not everyone records their races.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 12:36 AM
  #54  
turbosmart4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 12,240
Likes: 1
From: Alaska
Originally Posted by chevygirl2006
Maybe because she hasn't raced yet. And not everyone records their races.
Ok.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 01:23 AM
  #55  
nobody2u's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-14-11
Posts: 3,928
Likes: 5
From: Halifax, NS
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 01:28 AM
  #56  
turbosmart4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 12,240
Likes: 1
From: Alaska
Originally Posted by nobody2u
x2
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 05:22 AM
  #57  
DFZ24's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 08-07-08
Posts: 2,566
Likes: 13
From: South Florida
sooo..... i would say no race?????....
or she got caught racing and ended up doing some time overnight? jk
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2012 | 11:26 AM
  #58  
hugemurph4's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 12-06-07
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: Franklin TN
Since when does the Cruze have 181HP?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2012 | 06:06 AM
  #59  
DFZ24's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 08-07-08
Posts: 2,566
Likes: 13
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by hugemurph4
Since when does the Cruze have 181HP?
hence my question....
when did the 1.6 turbo came to america????
or he imported it???
Europe model, and couple other countries.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 10:29 PM
  #60  
BecauseRacecar's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 09-25-12
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence, KS
Definitely the Cobalt! The HP/TQ for the '08 Altima SL 2.5 is (pretty much) matched, but the altima weighs soo much more.. [Power:Weight] Ratio!
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 10:47 PM
  #61  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,809
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Originally Posted by BecauseRacecar
Definitely the Cobalt! The HP/TQ for the '08 Altima SL 2.5 is (pretty much) matched, but the altima weighs soo much more.. [Power:Weight] Ratio!
To the op sorry to thread hijack....


To Because racecar: please just delete your entire signature. Your not making 215hp even at the crank and definitely not at the wheels. Also it is header not headers. 23000k hid's? Can you even see with those? Anything over 5200 or so and your actually losing light output. And Im not being a dick but theres no way in HELL your running 14.4's!! Maybe maybe low 15's. Btw your most likely losing power with that cat delete whether you gutted it or replaced the piping from both turbulence and the pinch in the pipe for the o2 sensor.

Not being a dick but telling someone your car is making that kind of power with those kinds of mods and running that time just makes you look like an idiot and makes the rest of us look bad.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 10:50 PM
  #62  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,937
Likes: 94
From: Texas
Originally Posted by CordiaDOHC
To the op sorry to thread hijack....


To Because racecar: please just delete your entire signature. Your not making 215hp even at the crank and definitely not at the wheels. Also it is header not headers. And Im not being a dick but theres no way in HELL your running 14.4's!!
Ya more like 160whp for him lol
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 10:51 PM
  #63  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,937
Likes: 94
From: Texas
My car ran a 15.5 with the mods listed in my sig but minus the downpipe and header.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 10:57 PM
  #64  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,809
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Originally Posted by chevygirl2006
My car ran a 15.5 with the mods listed in my sig but minus the downpipe and header.
Sounds about right.

Ive barely edged out 15.5 cars. But Im untuned though not sure and its not concrete the 08's seem to run a bit stronger.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 11:09 PM
  #65  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,937
Likes: 94
From: Texas
Mine should run 14.9 now after the header downpipe and the tune I have now. Plus maybe some new tires and a cold night
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 07:46 AM
  #66  
turbosmart4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 12,240
Likes: 1
From: Alaska
Where is the videohs
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 08:29 AM
  #67  
riceburner's Avatar
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: 05-18-11
Posts: 39,564
Likes: 87
From: West Chicago, IL
Smoke him
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 08:42 AM
  #68  
Balt_and_Vette's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 02-08-12
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
You can't get the 1.6 in Canada. Only 1.4 or 1.8.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 08:45 AM
  #69  
turbosmart4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 12,240
Likes: 1
From: Alaska
Its an import yo jk idk
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 11:04 AM
  #70  
Twoozofjuice's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 12-19-11
Posts: 8,068
Likes: 4
From: Pharr
Originally Posted by chevygirl2006
Mine should run 14.9 now after the header downpipe and the tune I have now. Plus maybe some new tires and a cold night
finally getting what i was telling you.

I was wondering about that sig too..those numbers seemed pretty high in power and low in time...if theres slips/videos to go with it well then guess we need to shut up lol. if not some change needs to be done
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 12:21 PM
  #71  
BecauseRacecar's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 09-25-12
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence, KS
Originally Posted by CordiaDOHC
To the op sorry to thread hijack....


To Because racecar: please just delete your entire signature. Your not making 215hp even at the crank and definitely not at the wheels. Also it is header not headers. 23000k hid's? Can you even see with those? Anything over 5200 or so and your actually losing light output. And Im not being a dick but theres no way in HELL your running 14.4's!! Maybe maybe low 15's. Btw your most likely losing power with that cat delete whether you gutted it or replaced the piping from both turbulence and the pinch in the pipe for the o2 sensor.

Not being a dick but telling someone your car is making that kind of power with those kinds of mods and running that time just makes you look like an idiot and makes the rest of us look bad.
So what you're telling me (is that) even though my car (stock) is 171 horsepower and runs a 7.1 (ish) second 0-60, and a 15.6 second Quarter mile SOURCES: []Chevrolet Cobalt SS - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, and [http://www.zeroto60times.com/Chevrol...ph-Times.html] (And yes, I'm aware the Cobalt S is listed for zeroto60times.com, that even after just having maintenance, and modding what I did, that I would end up with less horsepower than stock, run slower 0-60 and 1/4 mile times, and that (according to you) that I didn't notice a gain from my res delete/cat delete + Magnaflow Muffler?

Honestly I'm about to dyno (hopefully) within the next 2-3 weeks. And to you "not trying to be a dick", you can lick my butt hole..
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 12:23 PM
  #72  
BecauseRacecar's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 09-25-12
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence, KS
My times are based on an average of being GPS-tested across multiple apps on multiple phones on multiple FLAT roads with no definite incline (3 apps on 4 phones different days, weeks, months, and on a highway in a few spots + different roads)
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 12:29 PM
  #73  
BecauseRacecar's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 09-25-12
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence, KS
And let me throw one more thing out there.. My latest race ( 3 nights ago) was against a 1999 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP (Supercharged with Full Bolt-Ons) who (AT A TRACK) ran a 14.2 second quarter mile and has a [gauge/reader/whatever its called] tell him his 0-60 is 6.1 . We started with a 3rd party honk from a dig, I beat him to 85, then he passed me and came out in front in the quarter mile (which has been measured) by a little bit more than half a car. I also had 3 people (total) in my car, and a confirmed a speed of 101 (just over 100 mph).
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 12:50 PM
  #74  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,937
Likes: 94
From: Texas
My times are proven at the track lol.
Can't base things off what you read on the Internet. Stock ss/sc aren't even running 14.4s
And there's no way a ss 2.4 can have 215 hp while being na. You will need cams at least and slicks. You have an intake,muffler,header and a tune. I'd say around 165whp. And plus you are an auto. That kills a lot of power.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 12:52 PM
  #75  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,937
Likes: 94
From: Texas
And that 7.1 0-60 is for the manual 2.4. Ours are around 8.3 0-60
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08 AM.