Intake for 2.4
That's a question I have been doing my best to determine. I haven't tried it so far, but I have thought about contacting some companies that make the 2.2L intake and asking their opinions on the matter. As far as I know the throttle body and intake system are exactly the same.
id think the 1's for the 2.2 would fit the 2.4
i know everyone that makes 1's for the cavaliers use the same size tubing for the 2.2 and 2.4
so i dont think that should matter on the 2.2 eco and the 2.4 eco
i know everyone that makes 1's for the cavaliers use the same size tubing for the 2.2 and 2.4
so i dont think that should matter on the 2.2 eco and the 2.4 eco
Here are the images of the two engines from the Cobalt. There appears to be a slight difference but I'd say they're within a half inch of each other location wise at most, and appear to have the same diameter and lip depth.
2.2L
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...0COB%20LoR.jpg
2.4L
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...0COB%20LoR.jpg
2.2L
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...0COB%20LoR.jpg
2.4L
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...0COB%20LoR.jpg
Good images.... just what I've been looking for
Ya know.... it seems to me that with the throttle body in that location.... this thing would do wonderfully with a short ram-air setup. It'd just be the matter of relocating the MAF sensor to just before the throttle body. Short piece of tubing... cone filter.... and there ya have it....
Comments??
Ya know.... it seems to me that with the throttle body in that location.... this thing would do wonderfully with a short ram-air setup. It'd just be the matter of relocating the MAF sensor to just before the throttle body. Short piece of tubing... cone filter.... and there ya have it....
Comments??
Originally Posted by Deaf_Dog
You guys see a difference between those two pics. I definately overdue for an eye exam.
look on the left on the intake , the 2.2 has mounting studs on it left over from the early ion's and vue(i think) that is where the pcm was mounted
also it looks like the port paths changed slightly , also the tb angle looks a little different
Originally Posted by vic_romano
Slight highjacking of this thread...does anyone know when K&N is going to release an intake for the 2.4 or if there are any out there floating around yet?
Originally Posted by brentil
Fujita has an intake in the works for the 2.4L VVT ECOTEC in the Solstice that should be out in a couple months. This kit of course wont fit in the Cobalt, but once the specs are out you'll know for sure if a 2.2L intake will fit on a 2.4L if no one else has figured it out yet by then. Hopefully that means they'll also make a Cobalt version as well though.
Originally Posted by swatthefly
i just got an email from kappasphere about their website, and didnt they have an intake on there? that should be for the solstice, but at least you could check the TB
Originally Posted by twiztedtrav
Just wondering if anyone has fit an intake for the 2.2 on a 2.4, I was lookin at them today at a car lot and they appear to be exactly the same. Anyone know???
I would certainly volunteer to use my SS 2.4 as a guinea pig for the intake. I've considered ordering one for a 2.2L before... just dunno about issues returning it if it dosen't work... heheh.
I'm hoping we see a larger increase in performance with the 2.4L VVT then the 2.2L engines from intake/exhaust. Our cumbustion chambers are a total of 8.3% larger then the 2.2L so it takes a bit more air to completely fill them then the 2.2L. So if the system is being restricted already at 2.2L then our 2.4Ls would be restricted even more. Especially if since the redline is higher too in different versions of the 2.4L VVT depending on what car it's in then the 2.2L.
Originally Posted by SilverStreak
Mike, exactly how are you planning to mount the MAF sensor onto the custom intake? That is really the only thing causing an issue in my mind as far as a custom job goes.
1. Its trash. It looks fugly and as soon as its on, my rpm hovers around 1700. It won't go down.
2. I bought the 2.2, which is listed as 2.4, but in reality is not. It connects with a 2.5 piece, and the throttle body is definitely larger. I had to take a rotozip to the rubber connector to even get it to fit. Do yourself a favor and just buy the one designed for the 2.4 R&D is done for a reason.
Yea. I bought th Weapon-R and
1. Its trash. It looks fugly and as soon as its on, my rpm hovers around 1700. It won't go down.
2. I bought the 2.2, which is listed as 2.4, but in reality is not. It connects with a 2.5 piece, and the throttle body is definitely larger. I had to take a rotozip to the rubber connector to even get it to fit. Do yourself a favor and just buy the one designed for the 2.4 R&D is done for a reason.
1. Its trash. It looks fugly and as soon as its on, my rpm hovers around 1700. It won't go down.
2. I bought the 2.2, which is listed as 2.4, but in reality is not. It connects with a 2.5 piece, and the throttle body is definitely larger. I had to take a rotozip to the rubber connector to even get it to fit. Do yourself a favor and just buy the one designed for the 2.4 R&D is done for a reason.
oh no..I just bumped the thread to the top..lol.. crap!!! oh well.. I guess thats what makes it


