2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

sri vs cai..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 10:07 AM
  #1  
averagewhiteboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 10-23-05
Posts: 8,761
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
sri vs cai..

Hey guys,

So, I've been considering going back to SRI for a little bit now.. I have an Injen intake. I've used it as an SRI since the day I got it (4 years ago) up until probably this past summer. I also threw a K&N cone on it.. I like the gain it gives, and I like the noise it makes, but I'm considering just going back to SRI for gain of simplicity when working down there, but also because mine squeaks a tiny bit on the CAI mount point.. Dunno.. See, I cut out this little air vent thing in my wheel well (like some cars have OEM) for flow. I like it. But I don't know if it'd be worth it to have it down there for what, a half an hp? Is the gain really that significant from running CAI vs SRI? I know there is a slight gain in top-end, but you actually lose low-end with a CAI, correct? So then you'd gain low-end and lose slight high-end with the SRI, correct? Also, will the intake be louder as an SRI or a CAI?

Thanks!
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 02:14 PM
  #2  
xxxxsh4d0wxxxx's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-22-08
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 3
From: New Lenox, Illinois
CAI: Better overall HP. Better top end. Less noise.

SRI: Better throttle response. Better low end. More noise.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nathan112i
Featured Car Showcase
41
Sep 30, 2015 07:12 PM
themacguy
New Members Check In!!
32
Aug 26, 2015 07:18 PM
CleanNFun
2.2L L61 Performance Tech
29
Oct 31, 2008 11:23 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 PM.