Cobalt SS Network

Cobalt SS Network (https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/)
-   2010+ Future Cruze Discussions (https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2010-future-cruze-discussions-162/)
-   -   v6 cruze (https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2010-future-cruze-discussions-162/v6-cruze-194755/)

evZO6 11-06-2009 03:31 PM

v6 cruze
 
I was doing so searching on another forum and there was talk about that GM should try and put the 3.0 DI v6 in the Cruze. I think it would be bad 2.0t better power and weighs less but thats just me. So my question to you all is what do you think of this idea?

occsdude 11-06-2009 03:32 PM

that would have some get up

drewbroo 11-06-2009 03:35 PM

Well imagine a DI 3.0 with a blower/turbo setup. That would make some power too.

occsdude 11-06-2009 03:40 PM


Originally Posted by drewbroo (Post 4434705)
Well imagine a DI 3.0 with a blower/turbo setup. That would make some power too.

well yeah. lol but those di's put out 270 hp

evZO6 11-06-2009 03:46 PM

they make a bit more power than the 2.0t but they only make 220 torque plus the weight difference from v6 to I4

Mudcrutch 11-06-2009 03:48 PM

GM is so fickle on what they will or won't do, I have stopped trying to figure it out.

Once you can go to a dealer and buy something that's when I believe it.

occsdude 11-06-2009 03:51 PM


Originally Posted by Mudcrutch (Post 4434739)
GM is so fickle on what they will or won't do, I have stopped trying to figure it out.

Once you can go to a dealer and buy something that's when I believe it.

agreed. its really annoying actually. i doubt they will, cause the cruze is kinda small to have a v6 in it

evZO6 11-06-2009 03:53 PM

this was not something GM was talking about just an interesting posted on another forum.

Acey 11-06-2009 03:54 PM

I can't think of one argument in favour of putting this motor in the Cruze.

DeftonesFan867 11-07-2009 04:42 AM

NOT gonna happen.

ColeJJones 11-07-2009 04:48 AM

i would want the 3.6di in there

evZO6 11-09-2009 09:51 PM


Originally Posted by ColeJJones (Post 4436176)
i would want the 3.6di in there

my moms caddy has that motor and it is sweet. plus jay leno's sema camaro v6 with twin turbos makes 425 horse so think of the options with this motor in a cruze

CurtisBAMF 06-28-2010 01:02 AM

383 Stroker and I'll consider it :lol:

Erick161 06-28-2010 01:10 AM

Obviously considering the went from a 2.2/2.4L N/A motors to a 1.8L/1.4T, means they arent considering big displacement anymore. The biggest motor that will probably ever be in the Cruze will be the 2.0T, thats it, IF that ever happens.

cmatthewb101 06-28-2010 01:13 AM

It will never happen

/Dream

PS. Most companies are getting away from the V6. Why a 6 when they can do a 4cycl with a small turbo for cheaper, and the same stock performance.

CurtisBAMF 06-28-2010 01:17 AM

I might be the only one - But I think they should keep the LNF and just say the 'Cruze' is a Cobalt remodel. Cobalt has only been in circulation for what... 4 years? I really like the new look but I think it should be a cobalt.

I agree with the 4 cyl over 6 cyl though

Erick161 06-28-2010 01:20 AM


Originally Posted by cmatthewb101 (Post 5058357)
It will never happen

/Dream

PS. Most companies are getting away from the V6. Why a 6 when they can do a 4cycl with a small turbo for cheaper, and the same stock performance.

Exactly, and works out better for US. We got a modable (for the most part) car. Hence the new Sonata, with a 274hp 2.0L Turbo DI motor. Thats awesome. Reflash and im sure it will be at or near 300whp.


Originally Posted by CurtisBAMF (Post 5058364)
I might be the only one - But I think they should keep the LNF and just say the 'Cruze' is a Cobalt remodel. Cobalt has only been in circulation for what... 4 years? I really like the new look but I think it should be a cobalt.

Cobalt was one of GMs most neglected models. The Cobalt was produced for SIX friggen model years and NEVER recieved a refresh. Thats almost unheard of. Most cars go 2-3 MAX before recieving at least new bumpers, updated headlights, refreshed interior, etc.

cmatthewb101 06-28-2010 01:22 AM


Originally Posted by CurtisBAMF (Post 5058364)
I might be the only one - But I think they should keep the LNF and just say the 'Cruze' is a Cobalt remodel. Cobalt has only been in circulation for what... 4 years? I really like the new look but I think it should be a cobalt.

It was actually 6. .....05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10. :lol:

And no they shouldnt call it a Cobalt, it looks nothing like it. If anything, the Cobalt should of been called a Cavalier. They had the same body lines. They should just drop the LNF in it, throw "SS" on it, and be done. The LNF is coming out in Buicks, so it'll still be around, so I don't see why they can't do it. I dunno. I'm sure someone will total their Balt, and throw the built LNF or LSJ in it somehow. But they need to make it look alot more sportier before I can take it serious.

Acey 06-28-2010 01:22 AM


Originally Posted by Acey (Post 4434763)
I can't think of one argument in favour of putting this motor in the Cruze.

I'm with this guy.

cmatthewb101 06-28-2010 01:23 AM


Originally Posted by Erick161 (Post 5058369)
Exactly, and works out better for US. We got a modable (for the most part) car. Hence the new Sonata, with a 274hp 2.0L Turbo DI motor. Thats awesome. Reflash and im sure it will be at or near 300whp.



Cobalt was one of GMs most neglected models. The Cobalt was produced for SIX friggen model years and NEVER recieved a refresh. Thats almost unheard of. Most cars go 2-3 MAX before recieving at least new bumpers, updated headlights, refreshed interior, etc.

The Cobalts got new inserts and foglights in later models. Does that count? :poke::lol:

Erick161 06-28-2010 03:08 AM


Originally Posted by cmatthewb101 (Post 5058373)
The Cobalts got new inserts and foglights in later models. Does that count? :poke::lol:

:lol: hardly. They never addressed the key concerns with the cobalt. Had they done a mid life refresh in '08 and tweaked the front clip/rear clip and more importantly revamped the interior, they might had sold more in the last fee model years...but GM didn't care and sales reflected that

CurtisBAMF 06-28-2010 11:08 AM


Originally Posted by cmatthewb101 (Post 5058370)
It was actually 6. .....05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10. :lol:

And no they shouldnt call it a Cobalt, it looks nothing like it. If anything, the Cobalt should of been called a Cavalier. They had the same body lines. They should just drop the LNF in it, throw "SS" on it, and be done. The LNF is coming out in Buicks, so it'll still be around, so I don't see why they can't do it. I dunno. I'm sure someone will total their Balt, and throw the built LNF or LSJ in it somehow. But they need to make it look alot more sportier before I can take it serious.

Hahaha my bad. I was reading another post where someone said 4 years so it stuck :lol:

HyperMuffin 09-10-2010 08:56 AM

So when the SS from went from LSJ to LNF that wasn't a refresh? More hp/trq, better suspension, nicer rims? I mean its not much but imagine if we had the LSJ from 05-10 and the LNF never existed.

ColeJJones 09-10-2010 11:00 PM


Originally Posted by evZO6 (Post 4442954)
my moms caddy has that motor and it is sweet. plus jay leno's sema camaro v6 with twin turbos makes 425 horse so think of the options with this motor in a cruze

crank or wheel?

bobbyhill31286 09-10-2010 11:06 PM


Originally Posted by HyperMuffin (Post 5221289)
So when the SS from went from LSJ to LNF that wasn't a refresh? More hp/trq, better suspension, nicer rims? I mean its not much but imagine if we had the LSJ from 05-10 and the LNF never existed.

cant forget better seats, no lift shift, traction control.....


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands