2010+ Future Cruze Discussions Discussions and information related to the upcoming 2010 Chevy Cruze

v6 cruze

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 03:31 PM
  #1  
evZO6's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 01-20-09
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: WI
v6 cruze

I was doing so searching on another forum and there was talk about that GM should try and put the 3.0 DI v6 in the Cruze. I think it would be bad 2.0t better power and weighs less but thats just me. So my question to you all is what do you think of this idea?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 03:32 PM
  #2  
occsdude's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-23-07
Posts: 3,938
Likes: 0
From: Haymarket/Norfolk Virginia
that would have some get up
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 03:35 PM
  #3  
drewbroo's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 12-21-08
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
From: TUCSON AZ
Well imagine a DI 3.0 with a blower/turbo setup. That would make some power too.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 03:40 PM
  #4  
occsdude's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-23-07
Posts: 3,938
Likes: 0
From: Haymarket/Norfolk Virginia
Originally Posted by drewbroo
Well imagine a DI 3.0 with a blower/turbo setup. That would make some power too.
well yeah. lol but those di's put out 270 hp
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 03:46 PM
  #5  
evZO6's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 01-20-09
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: WI
they make a bit more power than the 2.0t but they only make 220 torque plus the weight difference from v6 to I4
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 03:48 PM
  #6  
Mudcrutch's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-10-07
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH
GM is so fickle on what they will or won't do, I have stopped trying to figure it out.

Once you can go to a dealer and buy something that's when I believe it.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 03:51 PM
  #7  
occsdude's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-23-07
Posts: 3,938
Likes: 0
From: Haymarket/Norfolk Virginia
Originally Posted by Mudcrutch
GM is so fickle on what they will or won't do, I have stopped trying to figure it out.

Once you can go to a dealer and buy something that's when I believe it.
agreed. its really annoying actually. i doubt they will, cause the cruze is kinda small to have a v6 in it
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 03:53 PM
  #8  
evZO6's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 01-20-09
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: WI
this was not something GM was talking about just an interesting posted on another forum.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 03:54 PM
  #9  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
I can't think of one argument in favour of putting this motor in the Cruze.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2009 | 04:42 AM
  #10  
DeftonesFan867's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-04
Posts: 7,059
Likes: 0
From: Henryville, PA
NOT gonna happen.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2009 | 04:48 AM
  #11  
ColeJJones's Avatar
Bannned
 
Joined: 09-08-07
Posts: 8,743
Likes: 0
From: Kaneohe, HI
i would want the 3.6di in there
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 09:51 PM
  #12  
evZO6's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 01-20-09
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: WI
Originally Posted by ColeJJones
i would want the 3.6di in there
my moms caddy has that motor and it is sweet. plus jay leno's sema camaro v6 with twin turbos makes 425 horse so think of the options with this motor in a cruze
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 01:02 AM
  #13  
CurtisBAMF's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-11-10
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Texas
383 Stroker and I'll consider it
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 01:10 AM
  #14  
Erick161's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-14-09
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
From: New Port Richey, Florida
Obviously considering the went from a 2.2/2.4L N/A motors to a 1.8L/1.4T, means they arent considering big displacement anymore. The biggest motor that will probably ever be in the Cruze will be the 2.0T, thats it, IF that ever happens.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 01:13 AM
  #15  
cmatthewb101's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 10-01-09
Posts: 11,496
Likes: 1
From: Boring ass Columbus Ohio
It will never happen

/Dream

PS. Most companies are getting away from the V6. Why a 6 when they can do a 4cycl with a small turbo for cheaper, and the same stock performance.

Last edited by cmatthewb101; Jun 28, 2010 at 01:13 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 01:17 AM
  #16  
CurtisBAMF's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-11-10
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Texas
I might be the only one - But I think they should keep the LNF and just say the 'Cruze' is a Cobalt remodel. Cobalt has only been in circulation for what... 4 years? I really like the new look but I think it should be a cobalt.

I agree with the 4 cyl over 6 cyl though
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 01:20 AM
  #17  
Erick161's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-14-09
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
From: New Port Richey, Florida
Originally Posted by cmatthewb101
It will never happen

/Dream

PS. Most companies are getting away from the V6. Why a 6 when they can do a 4cycl with a small turbo for cheaper, and the same stock performance.
Exactly, and works out better for US. We got a modable (for the most part) car. Hence the new Sonata, with a 274hp 2.0L Turbo DI motor. Thats awesome. Reflash and im sure it will be at or near 300whp.

Originally Posted by CurtisBAMF
I might be the only one - But I think they should keep the LNF and just say the 'Cruze' is a Cobalt remodel. Cobalt has only been in circulation for what... 4 years? I really like the new look but I think it should be a cobalt.
Cobalt was one of GMs most neglected models. The Cobalt was produced for SIX friggen model years and NEVER recieved a refresh. Thats almost unheard of. Most cars go 2-3 MAX before recieving at least new bumpers, updated headlights, refreshed interior, etc.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 01:22 AM
  #18  
cmatthewb101's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 10-01-09
Posts: 11,496
Likes: 1
From: Boring ass Columbus Ohio
Originally Posted by CurtisBAMF
I might be the only one - But I think they should keep the LNF and just say the 'Cruze' is a Cobalt remodel. Cobalt has only been in circulation for what... 4 years? I really like the new look but I think it should be a cobalt.
It was actually 6. .....05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10.

And no they shouldnt call it a Cobalt, it looks nothing like it. If anything, the Cobalt should of been called a Cavalier. They had the same body lines. They should just drop the LNF in it, throw "SS" on it, and be done. The LNF is coming out in Buicks, so it'll still be around, so I don't see why they can't do it. I dunno. I'm sure someone will total their Balt, and throw the built LNF or LSJ in it somehow. But they need to make it look alot more sportier before I can take it serious.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 01:22 AM
  #19  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by Acey
I can't think of one argument in favour of putting this motor in the Cruze.
I'm with this guy.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 01:23 AM
  #20  
cmatthewb101's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 10-01-09
Posts: 11,496
Likes: 1
From: Boring ass Columbus Ohio
Originally Posted by Erick161
Exactly, and works out better for US. We got a modable (for the most part) car. Hence the new Sonata, with a 274hp 2.0L Turbo DI motor. Thats awesome. Reflash and im sure it will be at or near 300whp.



Cobalt was one of GMs most neglected models. The Cobalt was produced for SIX friggen model years and NEVER recieved a refresh. Thats almost unheard of. Most cars go 2-3 MAX before recieving at least new bumpers, updated headlights, refreshed interior, etc.
The Cobalts got new inserts and foglights in later models. Does that count?
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 03:08 AM
  #21  
Erick161's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-14-09
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
From: New Port Richey, Florida
Originally Posted by cmatthewb101
The Cobalts got new inserts and foglights in later models. Does that count?
hardly. They never addressed the key concerns with the cobalt. Had they done a mid life refresh in '08 and tweaked the front clip/rear clip and more importantly revamped the interior, they might had sold more in the last fee model years...but GM didn't care and sales reflected that
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 11:08 AM
  #22  
CurtisBAMF's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-11-10
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by cmatthewb101
It was actually 6. .....05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10.

And no they shouldnt call it a Cobalt, it looks nothing like it. If anything, the Cobalt should of been called a Cavalier. They had the same body lines. They should just drop the LNF in it, throw "SS" on it, and be done. The LNF is coming out in Buicks, so it'll still be around, so I don't see why they can't do it. I dunno. I'm sure someone will total their Balt, and throw the built LNF or LSJ in it somehow. But they need to make it look alot more sportier before I can take it serious.
Hahaha my bad. I was reading another post where someone said 4 years so it stuck
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 08:56 AM
  #23  
HyperMuffin's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-18-09
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 1
From: Nebraska
So when the SS from went from LSJ to LNF that wasn't a refresh? More hp/trq, better suspension, nicer rims? I mean its not much but imagine if we had the LSJ from 05-10 and the LNF never existed.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 11:00 PM
  #24  
ColeJJones's Avatar
Bannned
 
Joined: 09-08-07
Posts: 8,743
Likes: 0
From: Kaneohe, HI
Originally Posted by evZO6
my moms caddy has that motor and it is sweet. plus jay leno's sema camaro v6 with twin turbos makes 425 horse so think of the options with this motor in a cruze
crank or wheel?
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 11:06 PM
  #25  
bobbyhill31286's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-12-07
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 0
From: Essex, MD
Originally Posted by HyperMuffin
So when the SS from went from LSJ to LNF that wasn't a refresh? More hp/trq, better suspension, nicer rims? I mean its not much but imagine if we had the LSJ from 05-10 and the LNF never existed.
cant forget better seats, no lift shift, traction control.....
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 PM.