Drag Racing Kindle Racing and Dalcorp Racing

Anyone run these things in the 1\4 yet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 03:15 PM
  #26  
osmose's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 12-19-04
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Halifax
Originally Posted by rm25x
Um no. A 100 shot wet would bump the car to 245hp in theory. That would push it to the 13's easily. I plan on pulling some dyno pulls when the car is done to see what its really putting down at the wheels, both on and off the bottle. I have friends who run 9's with camaros and mustangs on the bottle, and they have lots of experiance with nitrous.
With only a 100 shot, not touching the rest of the car, you will not hit 13's.
If you will get: stage 2 clutch, stiffer springs, lower it maybe, an intake, an exhaust, and reduce your weight to under 2900lbs including driver, then you may look at a 13.9-13.7. Drag slicks would go a long way too.

Try it stock, but you won't get where you want to. If you are assuming some support mods with this 100 shot then it may be more realistc. And even so your engine will not take too many runs on a 100shot before pop, there goes the rod.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 03:27 PM
  #27  
UR2L8's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 03-09-05
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: -
I dont know dick about the car your speaking of. But on the springs comment, he would be better off with his stock springs. Lowering springs with a stiffer rate are only going to hurt your 1\4 mile times. As far as the car running this or this at the track I have no idea about those things so best luck to ya bro.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 03:35 PM
  #28  
MikeSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-09-05
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
From: Toronto Canada
Originally Posted by UR2L8
I dont know dick about the car your speaking of. But on the springs comment, he would be better off with his stock springs. Lowering springs with a stiffer rate are only going to hurt your 1\4 mile times. As far as the car running this or this at the track I have no idea about those things so best luck to ya bro.
Lowering springs actually do help 0-60 and 1/4 mile times in FWD cars. This is because, with a shorter spring there is less spring travel so when you hit the gas, the car can not 'squat-down' on its rear springs thus creating less weight transfer off the front driving wheels and onto the back wheels. If your car is RWD or even mid engine, you would want soft springs to get all the weight on your rear drive wheels.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 04:02 PM
  #29  
rm25x's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 02-19-05
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: Grand Blanc Michigan
well I won't be making runs on stock tires. It will be on drag radials. And mods will include intake, maybe ignition mods, 100 shot wet, and maybe eibach pro kit springs. Gotta love leased vehicles
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 04:26 PM
  #30  
osmose's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 12-19-04
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Halifax
Originally Posted by rm25x
well I won't be making runs on stock tires. It will be on drag radials. And mods will include intake, maybe ignition mods, 100 shot wet, and maybe eibach pro kit springs. Gotta love leased vehicles
Nitrous on a lease, "they not gonna like you". (props to anyone who knows where that lyric comes from)
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #31  
iwantacobalt's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-18-05
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Des Moines, IA
its probably 50cent or something
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 06:18 PM
  #32  
osmose's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 12-19-04
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Halifax
^ ^ ^ wow, actually yeah. PROPS.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 06:38 PM
  #33  
rm25x's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 02-19-05
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: Grand Blanc Michigan
Finally found some specs on my car: (well closest I could find to my car, I have a base w/o abs)

Chevrolet Cobalt LS - I4 2.2L (145 hp) M5 + ABS
0-60: 8.17 sec.
Quarter: 16.37 sec.
Speed: 87.60 mph.

If thats correct, no chance in hell at 13's lol. I thought I read somewhere it did the quarter in 15 seconds.

Time to pull out the GTech Pro. I think I can hit 60 at least quicker then that. Maybe not though.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 03:57 AM
  #34  
ircmaxell's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-11-05
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: NJ
come on... you CAN ALWAYS get it faster... for free too! I can never find the links when I want to... damn it... Well, they stripped (I wana say a civic) down to just the frame, engine and wheels... and got it down into like the 10's or 11's... BONE STOCK!!! ANYTHING is possible... It's just a matter of how far you want to take it, and the $$$ you are willing to spend... Face it, if you want a FAST 1/4 mile car, go get RWD or 4WD or AWD... trying to make a FWD fast is like trying to teach an eldery person to race in Nascar... Yes, it can be done, and there is some accomplishment in doing it, but you need to realize that you are limited from the start by simple physics (well, not so simple, but...)...

*No offense to anyone who prefers FWD, it's just for straight line acceleration, it is proven inferior...
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 07:42 AM
  #35  
rm25x's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 02-19-05
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: Grand Blanc Michigan
well yeah I am not a fan of fwd anything. But not much of a choice with this car. My next one will be rwd at least.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 08:20 AM
  #36  
MikeSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-09-05
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
From: Toronto Canada
Originally Posted by ircmaxell
come on... you CAN ALWAYS get it faster... for free too! I can never find the links when I want to... damn it... Well, they stripped (I wana say a civic) down to just the frame, engine and wheels... and got it down into like the 10's or 11's... BONE STOCK!!! ANYTHING is possible... It's just a matter of how far you want to take it, and the $$$ you are willing to spend... Face it, if you want a FAST 1/4 mile car, go get RWD or 4WD or AWD... trying to make a FWD fast is like trying to teach an eldery person to race in Nascar... Yes, it can be done, and there is some accomplishment in doing it, but you need to realize that you are limited from the start by simple physics (well, not so simple, but...)...

*No offense to anyone who prefers FWD, it's just for straight line acceleration, it is proven inferior...
All very true, but whats more impressive to watch?

a 2002 Camaro SS running the 1/4 mile at 13.10

OR

a 1998 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP running a 12.98 beside it and winning (I have watched it many times, and a 11.98 second Grand Prix GT with turbo)

I think lining up my SS S/C agains some older 5.0L 'stangs and beating them will be fun.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 10:09 AM
  #37  
UR2L8's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 03-09-05
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: -
Originally Posted by MikeSS
All very true, but whats more impressive to watch?

a 2002 Camaro SS running the 1/4 mile at 13.10

OR

a 1998 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP running a 12.98 beside it and winning (I have watched it many times, and a 11.98 second Grand Prix GT with turbo)

I think lining up my SS S/C agains some older 5.0L 'stangs and beating them will be fun.
I know of a 02 transam on stock 17'' ws6 rims that is preety quick.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 01:14 PM
  #38  
ircmaxell's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-11-05
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by MikeSS
All very true, but whats more impressive to watch?
True, true... But what is more impressive, a $400,000 civic running an 8 second 1/4, or a Ford Pinto running a 7 second pass. With its rusted exterior, not looking like anything.

At the local track, I saw a guy with a beat up Pinto that put a super charged 502 into it... Kept the outside COMPLETLY stock and rusted... Man could that thing fly... Just don't get rear-ended
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 01:34 PM
  #39  
MikeSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-09-05
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
From: Toronto Canada
Originally Posted by ircmaxell
True, true... But what is more impressive, a $400,000 civic running an 8 second 1/4, or a Ford Pinto running a 7 second pass. With its rusted exterior, not looking like anything.

At the local track, I saw a guy with a beat up Pinto that put a super charged 502 into it... Kept the outside COMPLETLY stock and rusted... Man could that thing fly... Just don't get rear-ended


Yeah, this is kinda the same point I was trying to get across. You should the looks on guys faces when a 4 door family sedan (GTP) smokes them at the track. My friend keeps it completly stock, right down to the stock rims, just to trick and embarress people at the track.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2005 | 05:46 PM
  #40  
Player_One's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-03-05
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta
Originally Posted by UR2L8
Was wondering if anyone had any track times on these as of yet. Im intrested in buying one as a beater car within the next week or so. What mods are out for them aswell? pullies? nitrous kits?
Haha. Nice. As a beater? Why do you care about the 1/4 mile if it'll be a beater when you've TransAm?
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 12:31 AM
  #41  
NewNann's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-21-05
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: 518
Originally Posted by MikeSS
And a QUAD4 (not the 2.4L you're thinking of, the original Quad4 of the early 90's) Made 170HP in stock form, and 175HP in H.O. form. The W41 in the Oldsmobile Calias made 180HP and I think there was alimited run around 190HP (correct me someone who knows the quad4's).
89-92 Quad 4 HO had 180, 93 had 175, and 94's were 170 due to increased emissions resrictions.
91-93 Quad 4 W41 had 190, and a 7400rpm redline. A rare find only in select 1991 Oldsmobile Calais 442's and 92-93 Oldsmobile Achieva SCX's both identified by the W41 stickers on the front fenders.
Not too bad for a NA four cylinder, especially in 1989.
Stay away from 95 Quad 4's
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 04:57 PM
  #42  
avro206's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-17-04
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Alberta Canada
Originally Posted by NewNann
89-92 Quad 4 HO had 180, 93 had 175, and 94's were 170 due to increased emissions resrictions.
91-93 Quad 4 W41 had 190, and a 7400rpm redline. A rare find only in select 1991 Oldsmobile Calais 442's and 92-93 Oldsmobile Achieva SCX's both identified by the W41 stickers on the front fenders.
Not too bad for a NA four cylinder, especially in 1989.
Stay away from 95 Quad 4's
damn---your as smart as me!! Don't know anyone besides me that knows these tidbits. Yes for the day it was a kick-ass engine. I often read of prototypes with turbos or S/C but it never materialized.


Just to correct MikeSS---the SOHC version of the Qaud 4 had 8 valves and was called the Quad OHC. It was either 115hp or 120hp. Only around for a short time--maybe 2 years.

When the Quad 4 came out it was 150hp. A couple of years later it was 160hp
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2005 | 04:32 PM
  #43  
thehemi's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-29-05
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Texas
My buddy had a '91ish Grand Am sedan with the Quad 4 and automatic.
The thing was able to chirp second gear pretty easy. Not too shabby!
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 10:06 PM
  #44  
hackeragent061's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-19-05
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, KY
Originally Posted by UR2L8
Was wondering if anyone had any track times on these as of yet. Im intrested in buying one as a beater car within the next week or so. What mods are out for them aswell? pullies? nitrous kits?
for a Cobalt LS
0-60Mph= 8.17s
1/4 Mile time= 16.37s
1/4 Mile Speed= 87.60mph
Reply
Old May 28, 2005 | 02:56 PM
  #45  
brianfcp's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 05-28-05
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: ARIZONA
Originally Posted by hackeragent061
for a Cobalt LS
0-60Mph= 8.17s
1/4 Mile time= 16.37s
1/4 Mile Speed= 87.60mph
i read 0-60=8.6
1/4= 16.6

um, i hope it runs low 16's... hmm..
Reply
Old May 28, 2005 | 03:36 PM
  #46  
redrocket's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-13-05
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Go to a post in the Cobalt Forum called Timeslips. I just ran the 1/4 2 days ago.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2005 | 12:37 AM
  #47  
XxGarbSxX's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-01-05
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Blackwood, NJ
Hey guys, I'm new here. Long time fan of Chevy and also a Saturn guy. I'm getting a bunch of people down to Atco Raceway in Atco, NJ on Friday June 3 if anyone wants to come down and surprise some people. Several of the SS/SC sister cars, the ION RL, should be making an appearance. I currently own a Saturn SC2 w/ just an intake and exhaust and am running low 16 second passes, so if some of you non-supercharged guys want to come down and get a good race in, I'm fair game. I'm looking to trade up to the ION RL. Sorry guys, but if I'm gonna buy a bowtie, it has to have Z06 in the name (never know, maybe I'll get both the RL and SS/SC). Again the date is this coming Friday June 3 at Atco Raceway. Looking forward to seeing a few Cobalts there.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 05:19 PM
  #48  
XxGarbSxX's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-01-05
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Blackwood, NJ
Is anyone going to Atco this Friday? It's been like 2 days and not a word.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigdeertz
Parts
47
Nov 17, 2016 09:41 AM
ineedacobaltss
Parts
16
Nov 7, 2015 02:25 PM
RaginChopsuey
War Stories
16
Oct 27, 2015 01:27 PM
goaliemo
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
6
Sep 28, 2015 01:37 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 PM.