Drag Racing Kindle Racing and Dalcorp Racing

Quickest all motor 2.2?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:04 PM
  #76  
jbenso4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-18-07
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
ran at the track...ran a 15.21....very dissapointed after intake mani and tune. i am taking off the intake mani and going this weekend
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:06 PM
  #77  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
Still a very respectable time though. Look at mine. What was your trap?


BTW, did you dyno after the IM and tune?
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:21 PM
  #78  
jbenso4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-18-07
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
93.26

and no i did not

Last edited by jbenso4; Sep 11, 2008 at 06:21 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:22 PM
  #79  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
Thats a nice increase in the trap. Throw some slicks on there and you will have a 14.9
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:28 PM
  #80  
Maven's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Thats not bad for an intake manifold man, thats probably like 10hp on top(going from 90-93mph)
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:28 PM
  #81  
jbenso4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-18-07
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
yeah i had really really bad wheelhop at the line i tried alot of dirrerent methods. I think my next purchase will be the solid front motor mount.....and btw i won the street class and i was the slowest one there...i won 6 rounds
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:32 PM
  #82  
Maven's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
93mph in a probably 3200lb car sounds like 180hp+ to me man...not bad.

Youre good tires, a wicked launch and a tailwind away from being the first in the 14's.

Last edited by Maven; Sep 11, 2008 at 06:32 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:35 PM
  #83  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
I don't think the intake manifold was a failure. You gained over 3mph in trap speed. That's what you want. Now you just need to work on your launches. Get some good tires and you'll be 14's no problem. 93mph trap is about 180+whp BTW. You are probably over 200 crank hp.

what was your 1/8th mile et and trap speed?

Last edited by ralliartist; Sep 11, 2008 at 06:35 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:39 PM
  #84  
jbenso4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-18-07
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
9.82 at 73 best
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:43 PM
  #85  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
man, I don't see what to complain about. You gained everywhere! especially the top end! Don't take the intake manifold off.

you need tires now to utilize the power better.

Last edited by ralliartist; Sep 11, 2008 at 06:43 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:46 PM
  #86  
jbenso4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-18-07
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
haha i just figured i would have gained more especially after tuning
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:48 PM
  #87  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
3mph gain is pretty decent though considering its basically a canned tune. When you get a chance, throw it on a dyno and see how much more power than stock cars you are making.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:54 PM
  #88  
jbenso4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-18-07
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
i have to admit it is wicked fast on the highway lol
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:56 PM
  #89  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
dude, 3mph IS A LOT for a N/A 4 cyl car to gain from just an intake manifold and tuning. I don't see what there is to complain about. In all seriousness, you pickup up about 20-30whp. maybe even a tad more.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:57 PM
  #90  
jbenso4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-18-07
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
haha i should just quit and boost the bitch
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:57 PM
  #91  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
If you are wanting 100+mph traps, then you need F/I. It's not gonna be easy getting there N/A.

and you beat me too it. lol. Boost will be way cheaper than trying to go really fast n/a.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:59 PM
  #92  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
Yeah, if you want a trap that high you probably need a Patriot performance head, comp stage 2 cams, and a race gas tune. lol

Originally Posted by jbenso4
haha i should just quit and boost the bitch
Boost it after you become the first n/a 2.2 on here to get into the 14's.

Last edited by XM15; Sep 11, 2008 at 06:59 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 07:00 PM
  #93  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
Originally Posted by XM15
Yeah, if you want a trap that high you probably need a Patriot performance head, comp stage 2 cams, and a race gas tune. lol



Boost it after you become the first n/a 2.2 on here to get into the 14's.
yea no ****, you are a set of tires away from getting into the 14's N/A!!! DO IT!! then boost it.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 07:02 PM
  #94  
jbenso4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-18-07
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
Originally Posted by XM15
Yeah, if you want a trap that high you probably need a Patriot performance head, comp stage 2 cams, and a race gas tune. lol



Boost it after you become the first n/a 2.2 on here to get into the 14's.
you my friend just made it a goal lol
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 07:03 PM
  #95  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
you hit just a 2.1 60ft. and you'll be 14.8/14.9, just don't miss a shift. Power shift that bitch.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 07:05 PM
  #96  
jbenso4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-18-07
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
the wheelhop is so bad on launch though
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 07:14 PM
  #97  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
slicks, lol
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 07:15 PM
  #98  
jbenso4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-18-07
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
wouldnt that make it grip more and then make it hop more? i would think that spinning would be better i do have 205's on the car
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 07:16 PM
  #99  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
No, it won't hop with slicks. Thats the way to go if you want great traction. You are more likely to hop if you have radials on because of the stiff sidewall.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 07:17 PM
  #100  
jbenso4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-18-07
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
how wide of slicks though?
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 PM.