http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...be0149887b.htm
i let off the gas in 2nd hehe and got 14.4 @99

 

"i let off the gas in 2nd"


why? destroy him!

 

well because b4 the race with shook on haveing a neck n neck race so... i let off the gas and he still didnt cath up so i was just like f it

 

WHAT ???????????? If you agree on the outcome before then your not racing

 

well im going this thursday so ill go all out okay gosh lol it was still a good time for me letting off haha but beating a gt with exhaust when im stock isnt too bad either way then this thursday im goign to race him agian a eclipse gtv6(I,H,E,75 shot) and a RSX-S(I,H,E,suspension,and hondata) so i have no idea wat they are both capable of running all i kno is that the eclipse is auto and it ran a 15 flat w/o spray

 

if the RSX-s knows how to drive he'll beat you. IHE and hondata puts them into the 13s with a good driver, suspension just means he'll be launching even harder.

 

well i'd hope he would win... $23-$24k car + $2k in mods should by all means beat a stock $20k car

that would be pretty miserable if he didnt win

 

there are plenty of cars that are more expensive than ours and a bunch slower. BMW's, MB's, and Saab's for example. Just because a car cost more doesn't mean it should or shouldn't win. the 45k Saab 9-3 convertable is a perfect example of this.

I was simply stating that the K series engine mods very well.

 

I beat my neighors 01 Billet Mustang gt in my 95 cavy (with 01 z24 2.4l motor swapped in) at the track 14.1 vs his 14.3. Nice kill.

 

awsome,just imagine what you would have done with Stage 2

 

but then youre comparing a cheap performance car to a luxury car. MOST people don't buy that saab for the 1/4 mile.

most people buy ss/sc's and rsx's, and Si's FOR the 1/4 mile

so comparing it the way i did is appropriate

 

Good run. Grats. The track is so much damn fun!

 

I just think saying "that car should win, it cost more" is a cheap way out. If everyone wanted the cheapest car that they could make fast we'd all be driving CRX's with build K series engines.

 

most people buy rsx's, and Si's FOR the 1/4 mile

exept for the ones that lose. when they do lose they claim there cars are for the curcuit

 

So true...

Anyway, a comment and a question...

First, the guy in the Mustang just plain sucks at driving. There's no excuse for running 14.7 in a 99-04 GT, unless you're @ high elevation or something.

And the question... The streetfire description says you're stock. So, you ran a 14.4@99 stock after letting off the gas? If that's the case, obviously you didn't let off for long...

 

Or you live in Az ^^ because thats pretty much there times here.

 

Not hardly. More like a fox body LX Mustang with a built small block Chevy in it.

 

Well, I thought maybe it was just high elevation, but if a stock SS/SC is running 14.4 after letting off the gas, the GT shouldn't be running 14.7's.

Notchbacks > *

 

Next time keep going please!

 

Thats a classic man! I love killing those slow stangs.