AEM dryflow vs K&N filter
AEM dryflow vs K&N filter
Ok im going to do the intake mod for my 2.4L and i would like opinions on which filter to use.........AEM dryflow or K&N filter????.......No comments on "OIL WILL MESS UP YOUR MAF SENSOR" please......im well aware of this and its not a big problem......Just some opinions reguarding air flow of the 2 and possibly sound and performance.........Thanks ppl
.......Later
.......Later
K&N filter is poor in filtering particulates, as compared to an AEM, which claims 99.4%
I had a K&N for my Caprice, and you could see through it. Thats not what a filter is supposed to do.
So i got a Wix for the Caprice, and an AEM for the Cobalt. Extremely pleased so far!
I had a K&N for my Caprice, and you could see through it. Thats not what a filter is supposed to do.
So i got a Wix for the Caprice, and an AEM for the Cobalt. Extremely pleased so far!
If i can see through the filter, i take whatever numbers they're spewing, and the filter, throw it into the trash, and recommend every time, not to get one.
I've said this before and I'll say it again. It's been proven that the K&N oiled filter will make more power than a dryflow.
Go ahead and call up Matt at Tune Time Performance, he's a supporting vendor on here. He's tested it on different applications, oiled filters will always make more power. Period...
Go ahead and call up Matt at Tune Time Performance, he's a supporting vendor on here. He's tested it on different applications, oiled filters will always make more power. Period...
doesn't K&N make AEM's filters? lol ..to me its just hat the AEM is easier to maintain and not have to worry about the oil ( i know you said its not a big deal but its just plain easier to clean when you need to clean it
)
)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



