General Cobalt General Cobalt, Pursuit, and Ion talk. Post specific discussions in the forums below

GM's future Cobalt plans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 12:12 AM
  #1  
rjc333's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 04-06-07
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Sherwood Park, Alberta
GM's future Cobalt plans

This may or may not be old news by now, but General Motors is planning to introduce a new 1.4 liter turbo motor for the Cobalt line in the near future. The following excerpt is from the April issue of Motor Trend:

"The Chevy Cobalt gets a moderate facelift by mid-2009 for the 2010 model year, and a 1.4 liter turbo engine for tightened CAFE purposes about the same time. The turbo will be based on an existing engine used in Europe. An all-new compact Chevy will replace the current Cobalt for the 2013 model year."

This news makes one wonder if the new 1.4 would replace any of the current powertrain offerings (2.2 perhaps?), but I would go out on a limb and say that we can probably expect GM to offer the new corporate six-speed auto with the new model, if not sooner.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 12:16 AM
  #2  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Old news. And yeah the "LAP" engine is coming in next year I hear.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 12:17 AM
  #3  
PenguinPIE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 02-02-05
Posts: 4,147
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
wow thats a pretty tiny engine, i sure hope it's not the future SS powerplant
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 12:27 AM
  #4  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
The LSJ didn't even meet 2008 requirements, so it looks like GM is struggling with getting their small engines down in terms of emissions.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 12:28 AM
  #5  
Omnigear's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 12-15-07
Posts: 13,998
Likes: 1
From: Manama, Bahrain
or at least loose some weight on the balt
kinda heavy for that eng
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 12:32 AM
  #6  
TheCaptain's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-12-05
Posts: 5,456
Likes: 0
From: Moosomin, Saskatchewan
The Cobalt shrinks to a econo size car near then, possibly with a name change. It's sad, when we have to shrink our engines and fight with our cars for food. (E85)
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 01:22 AM
  #7  
deuce's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-21-07
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
From: WestCO STL
sucks, but maybe this is good news for the guys thinking the cobalt will be a collector car, lolz
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 01:33 AM
  #8  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by TheCaptain
The Cobalt shrinks to a econo size car near then, possibly with a name change. It's sad, when we have to shrink our engines and fight with our cars for food. (E85)
Delta II will be a larger platform.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 01:38 AM
  #9  
tonio5555's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-05
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 0
From: USA
I bet the next generation SS will be an AWD supercharged ls7
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 09:01 AM
  #10  
Misery5567's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-19-07
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: Cheraw, SC
Must be because of that mandatory 35 mpg thing I read about somewhere that's coming.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 09:47 AM
  #11  
Evil C's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-26-07
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: chicago
im down with a 1.4 turbo if its going into an aveo.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 09:49 AM
  #12  
srowler9's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-20-07
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
I poop bigger than a 1.4L
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 12:06 PM
  #13  
deuce's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-21-07
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
From: WestCO STL
Originally Posted by srowler9
I poop bigger than a 1.4L
lol
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 12:09 PM
  #14  
RaineMan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-02-05
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake, UT
The 1.4L Turbo is like 160hp. Plus it's lighter and more fuel efficient. I don't think it will hurt the car's performance any... but I bet it will hurt sales.

Lotsa folks don't want boosted engines b/c of the requirement for premium gas.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 12:15 PM
  #15  
memphisr24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-20-05
Posts: 6,313
Likes: 1
From: Rutherford, NJ
Boosted cars from the factory rock! Boost is your friend
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 12:20 PM
  #16  
GULLABLE0NE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-24-07
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 0
From: Queens, New York
i thought the new cobalts were gonna be bigger in size? but smaller engine? i'm glad i ordered my 08 SS/Tc cuz it looks all downhill from thereafter.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 12:22 PM
  #17  
SSRedSC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-04-08
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
From: Where you live
That will prob be bad news for the aftermarket on the new TC.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 12:27 PM
  #18  
07LaserBlueSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-07-06
Posts: 2,077
Likes: 0
From: Nowheresville
Originally Posted by SSRedSC
That will prob be bad news for the aftermarket on the new TC.
The TC should already have some form of an aftermarket base due to the fact of the LNF being in the Sky and Solstice
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 12:32 PM
  #19  
Blue_Balt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-22-07
Posts: 6,179
Likes: 0
From: Howell, NJ
Originally Posted by srowler9
I poop bigger than a 1.4L
I drink more than 1.4L of water a day.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 04:16 PM
  #20  
Tomtwtwtw's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-30-06
Posts: 5,489
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
LSJ is a pretty dirty engine, but the LNF is much cleaner, with a lot more research going into it. I can see that 1.4 being a midrange engine choice, slotting between, say, the Astra offering and the LNF, should they continue making it. All speculation my part, though.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 06:24 PM
  #21  
tiny's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-16-05
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
its so far out in the future, who knows whats gonna actually happen
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 06:49 PM
  #22  
orlandomon's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-05-07
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: El Paso, TX
hmm i thought the cobalt was to be redesigned for 2010 on the delta 2 platform... not 2013....

regardless, i think it would be a good thing if cobalt production was outsourced to mexico. Ill probably get flamed for this, but I traded in my cobalt for an HHR, which is made in mexico... and it feels alot more "refined" and has alot less rattles than my cobalt......even though theyre on the same platform...

the only difference is hhr is made in mexico, while the cobalt is made in the good ol USA.... which explains the low build quality IMO.

i want to trade in my hhr for the next gen cobalt... but i really hope they improve it.. if not i guess ill just end up getting a base model camaro.. provided its not out of my pricerange
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 06:53 PM
  #23  
DeftonesFan867's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-04
Posts: 7,059
Likes: 0
From: Henryville, PA
6 speed auto/manual is said to be available and the 1.4 won't be DI so the tuning possibilitys are endless.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 07:08 PM
  #24  
halfj99's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-18-06
Posts: 4,883
Likes: 0
From: Madison,WI
hm call me old school but my first thing would be to see what i could bore/stroke that lil pea shooter of a motor so bring it back to real car sized
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 07:26 PM
  #25  
chevy cobalt 08's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 02-23-08
Posts: 5,881
Likes: 1
From: SI,NYC
arent super chargers better than turbo?? so theres no point for a turbo charged cobalt when a supercharger is better... turbos have lag
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 PM.