General Cobalt General Cobalt, Pursuit, and Ion talk. Post specific discussions in the forums below

GTI better than SS/TC and CSRT4?.......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2009, 04:32 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry GTI better than SS/TC and CSRT4?.......

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...son/index.html

these guys are idiots. Yet another bad review for the CSRT4. Forget the fact that it ran one of the best 1/4mi times and best trap. O, and the SS/TC isnt as good as a ******* flanel interiored, slow shitbucket GTI?

WOW. Heres how the list should look:

1) SS/TC
2) CSRT4
3) MS3
4) WRX
5) Ralliart
6) GTI
7) Mini
8) Si
1BADSS/SC is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 04:41 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Jackalope's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-12-06
Location: here
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well they didn't just test the 1/4 mile runs of the cars they tested everything. And it says the ONLY reason the VW bested the Cobalt was its Audi like interior quality VS the Cobalts rental car looking interior. So as long as you don't mine the interior the Balt is the best car. If however your looking for the best all around then its interior makes it 2nd place to the VW.

Further proof that the world doesn't just look to a cars 1/4 mile performance as what makes it a "BETTER" car. Now if CSS only could figure that out too.
Jackalope is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 04:43 PM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (39)
 
mkulrey13's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-30-05
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 18,569
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
/thread
mkulrey13 is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 04:43 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
orbalt08's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-10-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They didn't completely dog on the cobalt, just didn't like the interior as compared to the competition. I have to agree that it is lacking a little luster, but who cares if you get it for the performance?
orbalt08 is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 04:48 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-22-08
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I posted this in the other threat about the MT test results, and it applies here too:

Let's be honest here folks, judged as an overall package the SS/TC (or any Cobalt, for that matter) is not a class leading car.

I bought mine because it's amazing to drive, I like the looks, and it's fairly priced... But even so, I tolerate the interior. These guys aren't bullshitting when they say the GTI has a better interior, I test drove one and it's practically a damn Audi.

Someone who wants a sport compact for all-around use and isn't obsessed with all-out performance should look closely at the GTI, Speed 3, etc... In the case of this test, they judged the GTI to have a great interior and as being sufficiently sporty to satisfy the majority of people. Totally fair game if you ask me.

Besides, since when do quarter mile times determine overall excellence?
Force is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 05:05 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Jackalope's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-12-06
Location: here
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Force
Besides, since when do quarter mile times determine overall excellence?
Ever since the VAST majority of CSS.net member decided it does.
Jackalope is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 05:16 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jackalope
Ever since the VAST majority of CSS.net member decided it does.
why even bother buying a tuner if u dont care about performance? These cars are designed to appeal to the tuner nitch. Go on their websites, look at how theyre advertised.

Theyre not advertised as "nice interior" vehicles. Theyre advertised as a performance car.

MT and Car and driver need to save the interior crap for base model cars. Performance wise, the SS/TC and the CSRT4 are on top.

look at the tire spinning pic. U see any base model camrys advertised like that?:

http://www.vw.com/gti/gallery/en/us/#/exterior/5/

and this is the goofy ass interior they think is so much better:

http://www.vw.com/gti/gallery/en/us/#/interior/0/

looks like they raided a scottish kilt bands underwear drawer and sewed it onto their seats....
1BADSS/SC is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 05:17 PM
  #8  
New Member
 
MrIcky's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-01-08
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I posted on the other thread as well, but my thoughts are: ya it makes sense that MT would rate the GTI number one knowing their criteria. It makes sense that R&T rated SS number 1 knowing their criteria.
MrIcky is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 05:23 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Jackalope's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-12-06
Location: here
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC
why even bother buying a tuner if u dont care about performance? These cars are designed to appeal to the tuner nitch. Go on their websites, look at how theyre advertised.

Theyre not advertised as "nice interior" vehicles. Theyre advertised as a performance car.

MT and Car and driver need to save the interior crap for base model cars. Performance wise, the SS/TC and the CSRT4 are on top.
Where this is true a cars WHOLE needs to be looked at to determin which is the "BETTER" car. Interior quality and fit and finish as well as the cars performance all go into an UNBIASED look at a car. A cars WHOLE needs to be looked at, too bad Chevy doesn't realize that.......yet.
Jackalope is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 05:27 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
ace921000's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-04-08
Location: Southlake Tx
Posts: 2,669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
who cares what motor trend thinks? lol.
ace921000 is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 05:36 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jackalope
Where this is true a cars WHOLE needs to be looked at to determin which is the "BETTER" car. Interior quality and fit and finish as well as the cars performance all go into an UNBIASED look at a car. A cars WHOLE needs to be looked at, too bad Chevy doesn't realize that.......yet.
How about other stuff then? Since when did the interior have such a weigth to it?

How about the power train of each, the capabilities and max specifications/tolerances? How about any prior year issues? How about current aftermarket?

They fail to cover these, yet these are all VERY important for tuners. If I went out a bought a shitty ass GTI, and realized after the fact that the crap bucket couldnt even pull 300 whp out of its ass from mods with stock components, and other sport tuners could, Id be pissed.

Id love to see that POS GTI handle 400 whp and 500 ft tq without doing serious work.
1BADSS/SC is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 05:42 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
stage2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-28-07
Location: canada
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GTI interior is sick ..... over all i would get gti
stage2 is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 05:46 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
DebadgedBALT77's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-22-06
Location: nowheresville
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
since when did it matter what a magazine said about a car? you buy a car for what YOU like. If you buy a car based soley on what they say, youd be an idiot.
DebadgedBALT77 is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 05:46 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
rocketpunch1221's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-24-08
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...son/index.html

these guys are idiots. Yet another bad review for the CSRT4. Forget the fact that it ran one of the best 1/4mi times and best trap. O, and the SS/TC isnt as good as a ******* flanel interiored, slow shitbucket GTI?

WOW. Heres how the list should look:

1) SS/TC
2) CSRT4
3) MS3
4) WRX
5) Ralliart
6) GTI
7) Mini
8) Si
epic thread is epic
rocketpunch1221 is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 06:00 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
40rty's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-11-08
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,889
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
**** Motortrend, they also named along with Automobile mag that the GT-R is the car of the year. That car is not car of the year, that thing is Fugly as hell. Its not the cheapest supercar car cause its not a supercar. It can't hit 200mph, supercar gets its title by accomplishing that and just being exotic. Ladies the GT-R is far from exotic. The car was designed to beat the 911, that alone says a lot. The Carrera GT is what they needed to design the car against and then we would be talking about the GT-R being a supercar. ******* insane

Last edited by 40rty; 01-07-2009 at 06:11 AM.
40rty is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 06:03 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DebadgedBALT77
since when did it matter what a magazine said about a car? you buy a car for what YOU like. If you buy a car based soley on what they say, youd be an idiot.
It pisses me off that they always rate the CSRT4 on the bottom every chance they get, yet its one of the best cars on their list.

People shy away from them because of what those idiots advertise. Honestly, its the best damn tuner of the bunch if ur looking for drag times.
1BADSS/SC is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 06:45 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Cobalt2921's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-18-06
Location: Saint Charles, Missouri
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think Motor Trend saying that the GTI is better is pretty legit. The CSRT4 and SS/TC are fantastic cars, but there's downpoints, like the interiors. I mean look at this pic of the GTI interior - that screams ****** sick, minus the plaid seating, which you can get or not on the options, in favor of leather I do believe. The interior isn't the only thing, but VW and Audi are serious auto makers, why do you think you constantly hear their names mentioned? Quality cars.

Cobalt2921 is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 07:20 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Mazdaboi318's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-03-08
Location: Bossier City, Louisiana
Posts: 2,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
still to me...the interior isn't all that good!
I'm not a big fan of the GTi at all. They look sick outside when u drop it and put some nice rims on it. Other than that, all the companies can do better!
Mazdaboi318 is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 07:30 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
HunterKiller89's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-20-06
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
rea the comments. almost everyone agrees the cobalt should have been the winner
HunterKiller89 is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 07:33 PM
  #20  
Bannned
 
ColeJJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-08-07
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 8,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as much as i love the ss/tc.. the gti is a better car. in and out

i have driven both

Last edited by ColeJJones; 01-06-2009 at 07:33 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
ColeJJones is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 07:34 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ColeJJones
as much as i love the ss/tc.. the gti is a better car. in and out

i have driven both
better compared to what?

performance wise, not even close.
1BADSS/SC is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 07:35 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Mazdaboi318's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-03-08
Location: Bossier City, Louisiana
Posts: 2,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That car is so expensive to mod also!

I like the ms3 over the GTi.
Mazdaboi318 is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 07:35 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
steddy2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-08-06
Location: Newark DE
Posts: 25,530
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Jackalope
Well they didn't just test the 1/4 mile runs of the cars they tested everything. And it says the ONLY reason the VW bested the Cobalt was its Audi like interior quality VS the Cobalts rental car looking interior. So as long as you don't mine the interior the Balt is the best car. If however your looking for the best all around then its interior makes it 2nd place to the VW.

Further proof that the world doesn't just look to a cars 1/4 mile performance as what makes it a "BETTER" car. Now if CSS only could figure that out too.
Thank you Jack.

Stole the words right out of my mouth.
steddy2112 is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 07:35 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
JPizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-28-06
Location: Tampa, fl
Posts: 5,790
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The ONLY things I wish the Cobalt had, that the GTi has,

1.) HID's
2.) Those kick ass gauges.

But even still, I can replace the headlights, and somewhat "replace" the gauges.

So I'm very happy with my SS/TC.
JPizzle is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 07:36 PM
  #25  
Bannned
 
ColeJJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-08-07
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 8,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
naw, not stock anyways. but the car does drive alot better. the interior is way nicer and not cheap like our cars. you just have to drive one
ColeJJones is offline  


Quick Reply: GTI better than SS/TC and CSRT4?.......



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:08 PM.