'11 V6 vs '03 GT
V6 is stock, M6 with 3.31.
GT 5spd, 4.10's, CAI ...... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CA0WZ...layer_embedded |
wanna see it against a 05+gt
|
Originally Posted by Dart_SI
(Post 5129143)
wanna see it against a 05+gt
Keep in mind the 2010 GT is pretty much a intake/tune 05-09 GT. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTvs2z9nCPQ Bump |
Great finds!
|
Thats still very good that the v-6 is even keeping up, hats off to the v-6 stang
|
This is why my next car will most likely be a 2011+ V6 Mustang! Fuel economy AND power=WIN!
|
wow, 300+hp on a V6. technology now days.
|
Originally Posted by fakameanrepresent
(Post 5131703)
wow, 300+hp on a V6. technology now days.
Nissan's 3.7 with 332hp is pretty badass. But, to have a realistic daily driver v6 that runs 13s...thank you Ford :usa: |
still slower than what an sc does stock.
|
So what kind of potential do these v6 motors have for modding?
|
Originally Posted by blackss2.0
(Post 5133286)
So what kind of potential do these v6 motors have for modding?
|
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
(Post 5133278)
still slower than what an sc does stock.
|
Damn thats fast! What about the 304hp V6 camaro? As fast? Or slower because of weight?
|
Originally Posted by lwrs10
(Post 5133324)
what? '11 v6 destroys a stock sc.....
|
at least i know now that a stock SS/TC can take the nev v6 stangs too.
|
Nevermind
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bq17ecwFI7M
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
(Post 5133332)
really cause it just went a little over a tenth slower than what some sc's do stock.
|
Originally Posted by 07SuperchargedSS
(Post 5133338)
Nevermind
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bq17ecwFI7M Motor trend did 13.7 stock mustang v6 the ss/sc is definately slower stock |
102mph
|
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
(Post 5133332)
really cause it just went a little over a tenth slower than what some sc's do stock.
|
Originally Posted by Dart_SI
(Post 5133342)
what did the mustang trap? you cant really compare ET's of fwd and rwd cars.
Originally Posted by 07SuperchargedSS
(Post 5133338)
Motor trend did 13.7 stock mustang v6 the ss/sc is definately slower stock
|
No way a new V6 loses to a stock SC unless the Mustang driver literally does not know how to drive his car, or misses a gear. A stock TC will be within a tenth or two under IDEAL conditions.
|
Originally Posted by Red John
(Post 5133854)
No way a new V6 loses to a stock SC unless the Mustang driver literally does not know how to drive his car, or misses a gear. A stock TC will be within a tenth or two under IDEAL conditions.
|
'11 v6 can beat a sc in the quarter mile but it would be a good race from a roll.
'11 v6 is a good race with the tc in the quarter mile but the tc would win from a roll. |
Originally Posted by 08ShowbaltLS
(Post 5135432)
'11 v6 can beat a sc in the quarter mile but it would be a good race from a roll.
'11 v6 is a good race with the tc in the quarter mile but the tc would win from a roll. |
where r u guys getting 104 traps? the quickest i have ever seen was when it ran a 13.7 from motortrend and that was a 102 trap. the mustang gets excellent traction off the line but really isnt the fastest car from a roll. the tc has trapped 104 and i have proof of that.
another thing is you shouldnt go with motortrends 13.7 time anyway because that was a tester tweaked by ford and if u notice, other tester companies dont even really come close to that time. if u look around in the mustang forums, you will see countless threads of them wondering why they cant even get theyre stangs in the 13s at all. most ppl run around low-mid 14s when they go. i wonder why? |
Car and Driver got the 104 trap.
|
Originally Posted by 08ShowbaltLS
(Post 5135432)
'11 v6 can beat a sc in the quarter mile but it would be a good race from a roll.
Originally Posted by 08ShowbaltLS
(Post 5135920)
where r u guys getting 104 traps? the quickest i have ever seen was when it ran a 13.7 from motortrend and that was a 102 trap. the mustang gets excellent traction off the line but really isnt the fastest car from a roll. the tc has trapped 104 and i have proof of that.
another thing is you shouldnt go with motortrends 13.7 time anyway because that was a tester tweaked by ford and if u notice, other tester companies dont even really come close to that time. if u look around in the mustang forums, you will see countless threads of them wondering why they cant even get theyre stangs in the 13s at all. most ppl run around low-mid 14s when they go. i wonder why? |
not contradicting myself at all.
the FASTEST cobalt ss/scs run low 14s. the mags test like 14.6. u took out ur rear seat and passenger seat when u ran a 14.2, u even said it in another thread i just read. the average time the v6s are running are about 14.2, the average time for the sc on our forum isnt even close to that. it will be a good race from a roll but the stang should win in the 1/4 when both have competent drivers |
wasn't aware removing weight counted as nonstock power. any smart person will lighten their car when going to the track.
|
removing seats from your car is kinda lame especially if its stock. what r u trying to prove? that u can shave a tenth off ur time by making ur car a useless one-seater? i go to the track all the time around here and very very few people remove the passenger and rear seats out of their car. the few that do tend to be ricey civics that never run better than 13s. i guess everyone is dumb for running their car the way it came from the factory :rolleyes: i hope you're not on that list in the quarter mile thread...
|
what am i trying to prove? nothing, just trying to get the best time out of my car on stock suspension/clutch/streettires/stockpower.
hope i'm not on what list? |
Sexiest men alive 10'
|
yeah i'm not sure where he decided to make this arguement directed towards me lol. all i said was is that i can see an sc staying even and in some cases probably beating a new v6 in the quater based on people stock times.
|
im not directing anything at you man, u were the first to comment on my post saying i was "contradicting myself" and i wasnt. a 2011 mustang v6 will beat a cobalt ss/sc down the quarter mile unless the mustang driver sucks, plain and simple. oh and i was talking about the "OFFICIAL 1/4 and 1/8 mile thread" and i was hoping you werent on the LSJ, THE WAY IT IS FROM THE FACTORY list but you're not. done arguing...
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands