http://videos.g33kd.net/blackmamba_windows_wmv.wmv (LONG!!)

This car use to race at one of our spots, which is what some of the night vision runs are.

That car is beyond sick, even when it was stock.

Also to add that was not a turbo ls1 240z, it was a junkyard turbo 305 in a 240z.

Also I am trying to find pics of when he yanked the front tires. Crazy to see an AWD Porsche on 18/19x 10in rims lift the front tires.

 

cool porche, background music sucked ass. very quick car too!

 

That's a pretty steady-handed camera man on the street races.

 

Yeah he runs the local street racing site. Night vision kicks ass!!

 

What background music?? All I heard was the sweet sound of Porsche rumble.

 

Umm I dunno I am not hating here, but DEFINATELY confused. But this is just sort of the cliffs from the video.

The car is a BUILT Twin Turbo AWD PORCHE, and it runs 12s???????????????

THen the video says SACREMENTO RACEWAY SAYS DONT COME BACK WITHOUT A CAGE. Well roll bars are required for any pass faster than a 11.49, that car didnt even hit 11s, and even then it would require only a bar, not a cage?

On top of that the car pulls 2+ second 60 foot times? I Have seen FWD guys pull better 60s.

Then the car finally gets into the 10s high 10s, but 10s either way. It states in the video they bent rods in the motor just doing that.

I dunno I guess I just expected some overly badass car in this video.........we have 10-11-12 second cars running the streets here at every meet.

::Shrugs:: good editing none the less.

 

First, it is an automatic.

Second it ran 12s bone stock.

10.6 is not high 10s.

The car was built for road courses. He probably could have dipped into 9s with drag slicks.

2+ 60 footers equals him pedaling an AWD car not getting ANY traction.

He also pulled 1.6 60' on street tires.

Also for most of those runs he had full interior heated seats and all.

 

WTF does it being automatic have to do with anything?
It didnt run 12s bone stock, they showed it as having two GT30s and dont try to convince me it comes with GT30s and "custom everything" stock.

10.6 is mid 10s, sorry for the mixup.

Probably would have ran 9s? Benchracing FTW

2+ 60 foots on ANY AWD car is laughable. He can afford a TT porche and lots of mods, 10 sets of wheels, but not some decent tires?

I find it hard to believe he pulled a 1.6 60 on street tires, but was pulling 2+ On street tires. The car was obviously making MORE power to run in the 10s, versus the 12s, so I am SURE the tires were something suited a little more for a strip.

LOL ehhh in the video you can see he has a roll bar and stripped interior. Not that a porche as a TON of interior.

Why you getting your panties in a bunch, I am just pointing out the BLATENTLY OBVIOUS

 

uhhmm, bent rods after running 10's? That sounds pretty amazing...not! And any decent driver in a FWD car can pull off 2.0 60's on street tires. Add AWD to the mix, and even if he is on streets, he should still be able to pull off consistent 1.8's, or so...

 

^^^^^ hate to say it, but this site has way to much bickering, who cares if it ran a 12 stock or not, the fact is that car is insane and i would be more then happy having something like it. the fighting is not needed....

 

yea, the car was not that impressive. in that one set of street races, that 2g dsm would have been him had it not been for it bogging right after it launched. you can clearly see the 2g bog after he launched everytime. probably shifting too early. but getting kicked off a track when you are only running 12's and he was built. I dunno, I'm with streetbadges. I've seen a lot faster cars at just local meets.

 

It is BLATENTLY OBVIOUS you have no clue as to what you are talking about. I could write a whole essay to support this, but know it would be pointless cause you own the greatest car ever made.

I swear some of you SRT-4 owners are rediculous.

 

No car in the world can pull off 2.0 60's let alone 1.8's with NO traction.

 

It was built for road courses. I never said it was the fastest car in the world. The only thing that should be being said is that is a sweet ass car. Nothing else. And he didn't get kicked off for running 12s and when he was built he didn't run 12s.

That 2g ran high 11s.

 

Yeah I am just an idiot...............................why is it you think I own an SRT4?

Sooo point out what I said that could be wrong? I Mean I watched the same video as everyone else, maybe I missed something...........


No car can pull 1.8 60s with no traction? AMS evo makes over 1000HP and it still manages to get traction.

 

i pulled 1.7 60 foot times spiining the first 300 foot in my Z28. and that run was an 11.5 with jacked up timing... oh and the track officials didnt say anything to me and i dont have a cage or anything

 

Lets see a vid.

 

You personality gives off that persona of SRT-4ism.

Porsches have a lot of interior, most Porsches weigh quite a bit.

AMS uses drag slicks on all 4 corners. I was not benchracing, just pointing out the BLATENTLY OBVIOUS.

When he was built he didn't run 12s, you act like the video tells every single thing about the car ever.

 

I like muffins!

 

I like muffin tops, not the stumps.

 

http://www.baycityrides.com/files/95Z11fifty.wmv


there ya go.

 

first of all this argument is stupid

and second of all when superss/sc posted "First, it is an automatic"

well if u knew much about drag racing automatics are pretty much the best drag cars

oh and no just cuz im bitching u out doesnt mean i own a srt-4

srt-4ism wtf is that

 

ok, the car was sweet, it's a porsche, how could it not be sweet! but the 2.0 and worse 60's are honestly rediculous and wtf is srt-4ism. lol. That's a new one to me.

 

Stock automatics on a turbo car SUCK.

 

I laugh at sports cars with automatics.