Problems/Service/Maintenance Do you have problems with your new 2.0, 2.2, or 2.4L? What kind of service did you have done?

overpriced cavalier

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 2, 2006 | 02:32 PM
  #26  
Nightcrawler's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 01-10-05
Posts: 398
Likes: 1
From: USA
I drove a manual '99 Cavlier Z24 for 6 years before getting my SS/SC Cobalt. I even drove an '90 Z24 with the 3.1L many times that my friend had as well.

I have 12,000 miles and have not had to have ANY warrently work done.

The cobalt is better in many ways.

1.) The Recaro seats are MUCH BETTER than the thin Cavalier foam seats. hell, they are better than any seats in any sub $25,000 car.

2.) The car is much quieter inside.

3.) It's obviously much more powerful.

4.) Shifts and accelerates much more smoothley.

5.) It out handles the Cavalier in every way.

6.) 4-wheel disc brakes. Those drums on the Cavy really were cheap and sucky.

7.) Better stereo

8.) Up to date DIC interface. Not necessary, but I like having all those stats.


I think the Cavalier had a BETTER sunroof though.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2006 | 02:47 PM
  #27  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
i have to agree with the others... i too had a cavalier before the cobalt, and it is not the same car at all... there's nothing about it that's the same... my girlfriend who also had a 2004 cavalier and then drove my car (very reluctantly on my part, and she switched after a few minutes because i complain about the way she drives) was very impressed...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GM_Mike
Pictures & Videos
11
Sep 19, 2015 02:43 PM
Cptnslo
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
23
Sep 15, 2015 10:53 PM
GM_Mike
New Members Check In!!
1
Sep 5, 2015 07:50 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:17 PM.