Supporting Vendor Deals & Group Purchases For Supporting Vendors ONLY!

Rebel Ported Head *NEW PRICING* 2.0L & 2.2L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 04:41 PM
  #1  
Eng@RebelAutoWorxs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-10-07
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Rebel Ported Head *NEW PRICING* 2.0L & 2.2L

We have tested this head as you have seen in the past and we are offering a promotional pricing in effect until the end of 2008.

First the Power Gains:

58WHP and 30WTQ on a stock blower with intake and exhaust.


Stock:



Ported head, intake and exhaust:



Pricing:


OPTION 1:

CNC port intake, exhaust and chambers in a GM Ecotec 2.0L or
2.2L cylinder head. Diamond honed guides, valve job and deck
skim included
$1099.99


OPTION 2:

CNC port intake, exhaust and chambers
Diamond honed guides, valve job and deck skim
SI Valves Intake Valve - GM Ecotec - 36.1mm (+1mm)
SI Valves Exhaust Valve - GM Ecotec - 31.1mm (+1mm)
Ferrea GM Ecotec Titanium Retainer - use with S10057 valve spring
Ferrea GM Ecotec Dual Valvespring - 75lb on seat, 14mm max lift
GM Valve Seal - GM Ecotec
Clean, inspect and reassemble 16 valve head
$1959.99





PICTURES:









Specs:


FlowTest Data
Bore Diameter: 3.575
Intake Valve Diameter: 36.1
Exhaust Valve Diameter: 31.1
Chamber Volume: 50cc





Yes we know there are some other ported heads out there, but we have taken the time to prove the numbers which we are very proud of.

Also our porting company uses 5-axis CNC machines and CAD software for all projects.








Notes:

* All performance data is based on 2.0L, 2.2L is also available but we have not tested it ourselves

* All pricing does not include the head but based on core exchange, we currently have one 2.0L core in stock
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 04:52 PM
  #2  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by Eng@RebelAutoWorxs
First the Power Gains:

58WHP and 30WTQ on a stock blower with intake and exhaust.
Are those gains with Option 1 or Option 2?
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 04:54 PM
  #3  
Eng@RebelAutoWorxs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-10-07
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by ebristol
Are those gains with Option 1 or Option 2?
option #2, we didn't test option #1 but should be close

We would imagine anyone doing this type of upgrade would go with option #2, but we have #1 for those wanting to get other valves, springs, etc
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 08:18 PM
  #4  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
not gonna lie...its tempting. ill be a buyer ne day...but im poor right now. maybe in the springtime
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 08:22 PM
  #5  
Dayta's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-09-06
Posts: 5,427
Likes: 1
From: MA
wow... thats pretty good numbers for a port job
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 08:25 PM
  #6  
Immortal Technique's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-18-07
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: Southington, CT
Wow..that's sweet!
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 08:25 PM
  #7  
pimpnwink's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-17-06
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 0
From: New York
awesome.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 08:27 PM
  #8  
eurochevy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-14-06
Posts: 3,623
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC
wow 2 grand haha, im wondering how this would go with other mods like meth and smaller pully and tuning and such
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 09:02 PM
  #9  
yellowltcoupe22's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-21-07
Posts: 3,741
Likes: 0
From: lucedale, ms
if i could get this done cheaper (way cheaper) i could provide an extra head for the 2.2 app. free for an in-stock core since i have and extra head sittin around.. lol justa thought.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 09:05 PM
  #10  
Darkmanx's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-04-07
Posts: 5,190
Likes: 2
From: FL.. FT LAUDERDALE/MAIMI
subscribe
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 09:05 PM
  #11  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
i wish i had 2 grand
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 11:14 PM
  #12  
Johnboy12358's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-05-06
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Yeah, I need to win the lottery. That's all there is to it.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 11:42 PM
  #13  
shabodah's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 2,270
Likes: 1
From: Midwest
I find it funny that people are surprised. GM flat out told us all quite literally years ago that the exhaust ports on the head where the biggest bottleneck on the stock motor.

Yes, I've been one pointing at the intake manifold, but I've always said after the exhaust side of the head and exhaust itself was opened up.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 01:55 AM
  #14  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
what kind of gains would be expected from a 2.2 with this???
what type of overall hp would this be rated for??
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 02:23 AM
  #15  
RooTBeeR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 02-18-07
Posts: 14,089
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, Ca
damn, thats tempting right there
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 02:49 AM
  #16  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by NWAE Cobalt
what kind of gains would be expected from a 2.2 with this???
what type of overall hp would this be rated for??
you cant rate it at a HP level....you can make 500whp on a stock head, and you can make 300whp on this ported head. this just increases flow....

as far as the 2.2...what other mods? porting is more of a supporting mod
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 02:52 AM
  #17  
forced_induction's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-22-06
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
very nice
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 10:10 AM
  #18  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK



Reply
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 10:17 AM
  #19  
Rodimus_Prime's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
so basically you could take the option 2 head to 8200rpm if you wanted to?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 10:20 AM
  #20  
Coop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-30-06
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Lawton/Ft. Sill, OK
Did these runs have modified tune in the ecm or was it stock?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 11:02 AM
  #21  
Sales@rebelautoworxs's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-21-07
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: Rebel Land
Originally Posted by Rodimus_Prime
so basically you could take the option 2 head to 8200rpm if you wanted to?
Yes this setup with thease springs will be good for atleast 8000 rpm.

Originally Posted by Coop
Did these runs have modified tune in the ecm or was it stock?
It was a stock tune with AFR corections only.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 11:05 AM
  #22  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
What exhaust system was used during the runs? ie: header, cat, catback?

Is this a proprietary port profile, or is it the standard M2 Race Systems CNC port profile?(it appears to be M2's "stock" profile)

Does this pricing include shipping??

Is the 2.2L porting compatible the 2007-2008 heads?

Are the valves lapped in the assembled heads?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 11:09 AM
  #23  
ColeJJones's Avatar
Bannned
 
Joined: 09-08-07
Posts: 8,743
Likes: 0
From: Kaneohe, HI
this is the same head from m2race.com??? if so i will have gmr cams in there.... cant wait for before and after dyno results. should be sick
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 11:11 AM
  #24  
Coop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-30-06
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Lawton/Ft. Sill, OK
So to run this head tuning is involved.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 11:17 AM
  #25  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Originally Posted by ColeJJones
this is the same head from m2race.com??? if so i will have gmr cams in there.... cant wait for before and after dyno results. should be sick
It appears to be, they are using the exact same flow specs and even pics/graphics from M2.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40 AM.