Tuning For tuning and related discussions

Extreme MAF, airmass and Load% spike problem on big turbo LNF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2016, 07:30 PM
  #1  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
timichaud's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-02-16
Location: Rimouski
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy Extreme MAF, airmass and Load% spike problem on big turbo LNF

hello ! dont tell me about my english cause I'm french haha thank you!

I've build a Borgwarner 256 turbo cobalt for my brother with 3rd Gen block and wiseco pistons and zzp rods, ZZP intercooled, external wastegate, ZZP ported head with stage 2 cams ,springs, valves and big fuel lob. Lot of other pieces in the car.

Runs fine for 1 summer and suddenly the car cuts like anti-spin protection (but not enable)
the car run like **** 5000rpm to 7500rpm.

here's snapshot of my logs before the problem and with the problem


this is a normal running condition



here's you can see that MAF spike from around 350g/sec to 580g/sec




I've checked the injectors seal and look normal
I've swaped the MAF with an other LNF with same problem
Swaped spark plugs
This is not the gas too...
Put a brand new battery in case of low voltage for the sensors...same problem

Do you have an idea???
The car act like this even if boosting 10psi or 30psi or whatever

Thank You!
Old 05-02-2016, 08:47 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-05
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 12,485
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 60 Posts
The only thing that can cause a huge spike like that has to be an electrical issue, there's no way the sensor is actually seeing that much more air.

How are your engine bay grounds? I'd investigate all power and ground connections under the hood to make sure there is nothing loose or corroded. Seems more like a voltage spike when it happens.
Old 05-02-2016, 11:05 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ECaulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-10
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,574
Received 836 Likes on 733 Posts
I second the grounds, also check the battery out too.

Just a general comment on lnf tuning, lean it out, the lnf likes it leaner, you can run .86 to .88 and log the lo res boost or map sensor I didn't see it on the screen shot
Old 05-02-2016, 11:08 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ECaulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-10
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,574
Received 836 Likes on 733 Posts
Also your English is better than my French.
Old 05-03-2016, 07:50 AM
  #5  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
timichaud's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-02-16
Location: Rimouski
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
power enrichment is already at 0.84 lambda and already a brand new battery !

I will recheck the grounds again and ZZP tell me that can be condensation in lower charge pipe and I have relocated MAF because of the ZZP intercooler kit with the BOV
Old 05-03-2016, 10:26 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ECaulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-10
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,574
Received 836 Likes on 733 Posts
That certainly can cause the issues, pull the MAF to check for water on it.

I was saying set the power enrichment to 0.86 lambda and you'll make more power.
Old 05-03-2016, 10:49 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
blueLNFftw's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-12
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,397
Received 84 Likes on 69 Posts
plus 1 on the .86 Lambda.

It can, but it would clear up after a few spikes. I deal with this on long trips sometimes with temp changes and rain.
Old 05-03-2016, 12:35 PM
  #8  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
timichaud's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-02-16
Location: Rimouski
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ECaulk
I second the grounds, also check the battery out too.

Just a general comment on lnf tuning, lean it out, the lnf likes it leaner, you can run .86 to .88 and log the lo res boost or map sensor I didn't see it on the screen shot
The map sensor is log in the same layer of the MAF in kpa

And for the lambda it's set to .84 just to be much safe because we just have 91 octane in rimouski and high boost

I don't have pyrometer on the downpipe to know the combustion chamber temp...this is an other things why set to .84

But I know that to much fuel can be bad too hahaha I will try .86 to .88
Old 05-03-2016, 01:04 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ECaulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-10
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,574
Received 836 Likes on 733 Posts
You need the lo res map, not the straight map sensor that tops out at 255kPa even with the 3bars at least in the log and the ecu.

You'll be fine running 0.86 on pump, direction injection is completely different for fueling than a port injection engine is.
Old 05-03-2016, 05:01 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
blueLNFftw's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-12
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,397
Received 84 Likes on 69 Posts
Your logging a MAP, just not the right one.

Lean it out still, adjust spark.

Did you check the maf and pull out the IC to check for water in it.
Old 06-21-2016, 10:04 AM
  #11  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
timichaud's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-02-16
Location: Rimouski
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The problem is bigger than expected haha! one roller of the hydraulic lifter is broken and the cam is now good for the garbage! this is a pre-assembled ZZP ported head so zzp tell me to ship the cam and they will replace my cam and the lifter and rocker!

the MAF spike are probably because of only one exhaust valve of the 2 open in the cylinder one

thank you every one
Old 07-06-2016, 08:39 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
rnjmur's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-06-06
Location: O Fallon, MO
Posts: 2,729
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by timichaud
The problem is bigger than expected haha! one roller of the hydraulic lifter is broken and the cam is now good for the garbage! this is a pre-assembled ZZP ported head so zzp tell me to ship the cam and they will replace my cam and the lifter and rocker!

the MAF spike are probably because of only one exhaust valve of the 2 open in the cylinder one

thank you every one
glad you figured it out. I was going to suggest that it looked like compressor surge but a blown lifter will do the same thing.

I also agree with the other posters, no reason to be running so rich. You will make more power running a leaner lambda and retarded timing then to running a richer lambda with more timing advance. There is really no need to run richer than .86 lambda. If you are worried about cylinder temps then use the COT (Catalyst Over Temp) tables to command a richer lambda only when you think it might be necessary.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
soundjunky
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
16
02-15-2017 03:28 PM
mkriebs
Parts
3
05-29-2016 10:38 PM
blueLNFftw
Parts
1
02-19-2016 10:53 AM
Tomcat801
Problems/Service/Maintenance
0
02-17-2016 03:47 PM
06blackbalt
Parts
0
02-10-2016 08:54 PM



Quick Reply: Extreme MAF, airmass and Load% spike problem on big turbo LNF



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 AM.